Robotic Brace Incorporating Electromyography (EMG) for Moderate Affected Arm Impairment After Stroke

March 23, 2011 updated by: University of Cincinnati

Robotic Brace Incorporating EMG for Moderate Affected Arm Impairment After Stroke

Stroke is the leading cause of disability in the United States. One of the reasons that it is so disabling is because of upper extremity hemiparesis (weakness in one arm), which is commonly seen after stroke.

The objective of this research is to see if a robotic system worn on the weakened arm like a brace is more useful in improving the strength and coordination of the affected arm, and those of other stroke survivors, than therapy only. Muscle weakness and lack of coordination after a stroke have great effects on how severely disabled the arm is and on quality of life after a stroke.

In this study, patients may be administered a new robotic brace as part of treatment for their affected arms. If they use this brace, your electromyography (EMG) signals will be used to control the powered arm brace. EMG signals are the small electrical signals that result from the actions of the muscles. The system will "listen" to patients' muscles, using small sensors that sit on top of the skin. The device will give the arm a "power-assist" when patients bend or straighten their elbows. The investigators want to test how easy and effective this system is to use. The investigators hypothesize that people using the robot will be more successful in their rehabilitative efforts - and that their movement will improve more - than people receiving traditional therapy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • Recruiting
        • Univcersity of Cincinnati
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephen Page, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Upper extremity Fugl Meyer score >10-< 25
  • presence of volitionally activated EMG signal from the paretic biceps brachii of at least 5 ųV in amplitude
  • stroke experienced > 1 month prior to study enrollment;
  • a score > 24 on the Folstein Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)
  • age > 35 < 85
  • have experienced one stroke
  • discharged from all forms of physical rehabilitation
  • Myomo brace fits on affected arm properly and without discomfort (i.e., no red marks or discomfort observed in 10 minutes of use during fitting).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 35 years old
  • excessive pain in the affected hand, arm or shoulder, as measured by a score > 5 on a 10-point visual analog scale
  • excessive spasticity at the affected elbow, as defined as a score of > 4 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale
  • currently participating in any experimental rehabilitation or drug studies
  • apraxia (< 2.5 on the Alexander scale)
  • severe sensory loss in affected hand (Nottingham sensory scale at least 75% of normal)
  • severe language deficits (score < 2 on NIH Stroke Scale question 9)
  • Stroke that occurred in the brainstem
  • A current medical history of uncontrolled cardiovascular, or pulmonary disease, or other disease that would preclude involvement in a therapeutic treatment
  • History of neurological disorder other than stroke (other neurological disorders may affect the upper extremity motor performance of subjects.)
  • Other significant pain or skin irritation in the upper extremity that would be exacerbated if by the use of the brace
  • Substantial contracture of elbow, defined as > 20 degrees of elbow flexion, as measured at the baseline evaluation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Myomo + RTP
This group will be administered a regimen comprised of repetitive task specific practice (RTP) in conjunction with use of the robotic brace described elsewhere in this record.
Subjects in this group will be administered about an hour/day of therapy targeting the affected arm. This therapy will include about 1/2 an hour of use of a robot that targets arm function and assists with the movement of the affected arm, and about 1/2 an hour of repetitive task specific training (TRP) using the affected arm.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Myomo
Patients in this group will only be administered the robotic brace described elsewhere in this record.
Subjects in this group will be administered about an hour/day of therapy targeting the affected arm. Subjects will use a robot that targets arm function and assists with the movement of the affected arm.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: RTP only
Patients in this group will be administered repetitive task specific practice (RTP), emphasizing use of their affected arms during performance of valued, functional tasks.
Subjects in this group will be administered about an hour/day of therapy targeting the affected arm. This therapy will include consist of repetitive task specific training (RTP) using the affected arm, in which patients use the arm to relearn valued movements using their arms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline to after intervention and 3 months after intervention in the amount of active movement at each joint of the affected arm. This will be measured using the upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment.
Time Frame: Twice before intervention; once after intervention; 2 months after intervention.
The primary outcome in this study is arm impairment. We will measure this using the Fugl-Meyer; a stroke-specific measure that determines how much active movement patients exhibit at each joint of the affected upper extremity.
Twice before intervention; once after intervention; 2 months after intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 25, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 25, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Myomo e100 Robot and repetitive task specific training

3
Subscribe