The Laryngeal Tube Suction Versus Endotracheal Tube for Ventilation in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

April 29, 2011 updated by: Prince of Songkla University

The Laryngeal Tube Suction vs Endotracheal Tube for Ventilation in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

This study the investigators compare peak airway pressure (PAP), expire tidal volume (TV), end tidal CO2 (ETCO2), SpO2, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) after the insertion of laryngeal tube suction or endotracheal tube in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background:

For standard procedure, the endotracheal tube is used to ventilate the anesthetized patients who undergo gynecological laparoscopic surgery that increase intrabdominal pressure. Now there is a new supraglottic airway device, laryngeal tube suction (LTs) can be use instead of ETT.

Objective This study the investigators compare peak airway pressure (PAP), expire tidal volume (TV), end tidal CO2 (ETCO2), SpO2, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) after the insertion of laryngeal tube suction or endotracheal tube in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Material and methods Prospective single blinded randomized control trial, the patients were divided into two groups, LTs group and ETT group n = 60 for each group. All patients were induced anesthesia with fentanyl 1-2 mcg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg then maintained anesthesia with air : oxygen 30%. Respirator setting are tidal volume 10 ml/kg, I/E 1:2 adjust RR base on ETCO2 keep ETCO2 35-40 mmHg.

Results No statistical difference in demographic data between groups. PAP and ETCO2 in the LTs group were significant higher than ETT group in the first 5 and 10 minutes but no statistically significant after 10 minutes until the end of operation. No statistically significant in TV and SpO2 between groups. In ETT group MAP and HR after insertion are significant higher than LTs group, no statistically significant about postoperative complication such as sorethroat, hoarseness and nausea vomiting.

Conclusion LTs can be used in gynecological laparoscopic surgery like ETT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Songkhla
      • Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand, 90110
        • Songklanagarind Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female age between 20-65 years
  • ASA class 1-2
  • elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery
  • height < 180 cm
  • BMI < 35 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • interincisor gap < 2.5 cm
  • risk of aspiration
  • history of difficult intubation
  • oropharyngeal pathology
  • allergy to anesthetic drug

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: laryngeal tube
laryngeal tube suction has suction port
laryngeal tube suction number 3 and 4
Other Names:
  • The laryngeal tube(VBM Medizintechnik, Sulz, Germany)
Experimental: endotracheal tube
laryngeal tube suction number 3 and 4
Other Names:
  • The laryngeal tube(VBM Medizintechnik, Sulz, Germany)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
respiratory parameter
Time Frame: 1-3 hours
ETCO2, peak airway pressure and expired TV during operative period
1-3 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hemodynamic response
Time Frame: 30 minutes
blood pressure and heart rate after LT insertion
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 2, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 2, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LT-Laparo

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Focus Groups

Clinical Trials on laryngeal tube (VBM Medizintechnik, Sulz, Germany)

3
Subscribe