- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01360645
Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Fixed Dose OPC-34712 as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder (the Pyxis Trial) (Pyxis)
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Fixed Dose OPC-34712 as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder, the Pyxis Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
British Columbia
-
Penticton, British Columbia, Canada
- Research Site
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Research Site
-
-
Quebec
-
Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Arcachon, France
- Research Site
-
Elancourt, France
- Research Site
-
Orvault, France
- Research Site
-
Palaiseau, France
- Research Site
-
Toulouse, France
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Belchatow, Poland
- Research Site
-
Gdynia, Poland
- Research Site
-
Kielce, Poland
- Research Site
-
Lublin, Poland
- Research Site
-
Tuszyn, Poland
- Research Site
-
Warszawa, Poland
- Research Site
-
-
Upper Silesia
-
Katowice, Upper Silesia, Poland
- Research Site
-
-
Woj. Wielkopolskie
-
Poznan, Woj. Wielkopolskie, Poland
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Bratislava, Slovakia
- Research Site
-
Kosice-Barca, Slovakia
- Research Site
-
Levice, Slovakia
- Research Site
-
Michalovce, Slovakia
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
California
-
Arcadia, California, United States
- Research Site
-
Beverly Hills, California, United States
- Research Site
-
Fresno, California, United States
- Research Site
-
Oceanside, California, United States
- Research Site
-
San Diego, California, United States
- Research Site
-
San Francisco, California, United States
- Research Site
-
Sherman Oaks, California, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Colorado
-
Denver, Colorado, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Connecticut
-
Norwalk, Connecticut, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Florida
-
Coral Springs, Florida, United States
- Research Site
-
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
- Research Site
-
Hialeah, Florida, United States
- Research Site
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
- Research Site
-
Melbourne, Florida, United States
- Research Site
-
Orlando, Florida, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Kansas
-
Prairie Village, Kansas, United States
- Research Site
-
Wichita, Kansas, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
- Research Site
-
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Belmont, Massachusetts, United States
- Research Site
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Nebraska
-
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
- Research Site
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States
- Research Site
-
Rochester, New York, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Ohio
-
Dayton, Ohio, United States
- Research Site
-
Toledo, Ohio, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Oregon
-
Salem, Oregon, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
- Research Site
-
Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States
- Research Site
-
Bridgeville, Pennsylvania, United States
- Research Site
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Texas
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Utah
-
Murray, Utah, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Vermont
-
Woodstock, Vermont, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female subjects between 18 and 65 years of age, with diagnosis of major depressive disorder, as defined by DSM-IV-TR criteria
- The current depressive episode must be equal to or greater than 8 weeks in duration
- Subjects must report a history for the current depressive episode of an inadequate response to no more than three adequate antidepressant treatments
Exclusion Criteria:
- Females who are breast-feeding and/or who have a positive pregnancy test result prior to receiving study drug
- Subjects who report an inadequate response to more than three adequate trials of antidepressant treatments during current depressive episode at a therapeutic dose for an adequate duration.
- Subjects with a current Axis I (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis of: Delirium, dementia, amnestic or other cognitive disorder, Schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other psychotic disorder, Bipolar I or II disorder
- Subjects with a clinically significant current Axis II (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis of borderline, antisocial, paranoid, schizoid, schizotypal or histrionic personality disorder
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Phase B
Drug: OPC-34712 + ADT Drug: Placebo + ADT |
Tablet, Oral, 2 mg OPC-34712 and FDA Approved Antidepressant Therapy (ADT)
Placebo + FDA Approved Antidepressant (ADT)
|
Placebo Comparator: Phase A
Intervention: Drug: Placebo + ADT
|
Placebo + FDA Approved Antidepressant (ADT)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score for the Efficacy Sample.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The MADRS consists of 10 items, all rated on a 0 to 6 scale with 0 being the "best" rating and 6 being the "worst" rating.
The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items.
The possible total scores are from 0 to 60.
The MADRS total score will be un-evaluable if less than 8 of the 10 items are recorded.
If 8 or 9 of the 10 items are recorded, the MADRS total score will be the mean of the recorded items multiplied by 10 and then rounded to the first decimal place.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in MADRS Total Score for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The MADRS consists of 10 items, all rated on a 0 to 6 scale with 0 being the "best" rating and 6 being the "worst" rating.
The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items.
The possible total scores are from 0 to 60.
The MADRS total score will be un-evaluable if less than 8 of the 10 items are recorded.
If 8 or 9 of the 10 items are recorded, the MADRS total score will be the mean of the recorded items multiplied by 10 and then rounded to the first decimal place.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Score for the Efficacy Sample.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The SDS is a self-rated instrument used to measure the effect of the patient's symptoms on work/school, social life, and family/home responsibilities.
For each of the three items, scores range from 0 through 10.
The number most representative of how much each area was disrupted by symptoms is marked along the line from 0 = not at all, to 10 = extremely.
For the work/school item, no response was to be entered if the patient did not work or go to school for reasons unrelated to the disorder and a response therefore not being applicable.
The Mean SDS Score will be calculated over the three item scores.
All three item scores need to be available with the exception of the work/school item score when this item is not applicable.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Mean Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in SDS Score for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The SDS is a self-rated instrument used to measure the effect of the patient's symptoms on work/school, social life, and family/home responsibilities.
For each of the three items, scores range from 0 through 10.
The number most representative of how much each area was disrupted by symptoms is marked along the line from 0 = not at all, to 10 = extremely.
For the work/school item, no response was to be entered if the patient did not work or go to school for reasons unrelated to the disorder and a response therefore not being applicable.
The Mean SDS Score will be calculated over the three item scores.
All three item scores need to be available with the exception of the work/school item score when this item is not applicable.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in MADRS Total Score by Trial Week for the Efficacy Sample.
Time Frame: Week 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13
|
The MADRS consists of 10 items, all rated on a 0 to 6 scale with 0 being the "best" rating and 6 being the "worst" rating.
The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items.
The possible total scores are from 0 to 60.
The MADRS total score will be un-evaluable if less than 8 of the 10 items are recorded.
If 8 or 9 of the 10 items are recorded, the MADRS total score will be the mean of the recorded items multiplied by 10 and then rounded to the first decimal place.
|
Week 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in MADRS Total Score by Trial Week for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol.
Time Frame: Week 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13
|
The MADRS consists of 10 items, all rated on a 0 to 6 scale with 0 being the "best" rating and 6 being the "worst" rating.
The MADRS total score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items.
The possible total scores are from 0 to 60.
The MADRS total score will be un-evaluable if less than 8 of the 10 items are recorded.
If 8 or 9 of the 10 items are recorded, the MADRS total score will be the mean of the recorded items multiplied by 10 and then rounded to the first decimal place.
|
Week 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13
|
Mean Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 by Trial Week for the Efficacy Sample.
Time Frame: Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
The items on CGI-I scale are: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse.
The score of 0 (= not assessed) will be set to missing.
The CGI-I is therefore a 7-point scale from 1 through 7. The CGI-I was measured in related to Baseline (Week 8).
|
Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
Mean CGI-I Scale Score (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 by Trial Week for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol.
Time Frame: Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
The items on CGI-I scale are: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse.
The score of 0 (= not assessed) will be set to missing.
The CGI-I is therefore a 7-point scale from 1 through 7. The CGI-I was measured in related to Baseline (Week 8).
|
Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale Score for the Efficacy Sample.
Time Frame: Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
Items on CGI-S scale are: 0 = not assessed, 1 = normal, not at all ill, 2 = borderline mentally ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill patients.
The score 0 (= not assessed) will be set to missing.
The CGI-S is therefore a 7-point scale from 1 through 7.
|
Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in CGI-S Scale Score for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol.
Time Frame: Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
Items on CGI-S scale are: 0 = not assessed, 1 = normal, not at all ill, 2 = borderline mentally ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill patients.
The score 0 (= not assessed) will be set to missing.
The CGI-S is therefore a 7-point scale from 1 through 7.
|
Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-Report) (IDS-SR) Total Score for the Efficacy Sample.
Time Frame: Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
The IDS-SR consists of 30 items, all rated on a 0 to 3 scale with 0 being the "best" rating and 3 being the "worst" rating. Besides item 9, two sub-items 9A and 9B exist, with possible scores of 1, 2 or 3 for item 9A, and 0 or 1 for item 9B. The scores for these two sub-items are not included in the calculation of the total score. Item 11 or item 12 should be completed but not both, and similarly, item 13 or item 14 should be completed but not both. Should items 11 and 12 be rated both, then the maximum of the two scores will be used. The same approach will be used for handling items 13 and 14. The IDS-SR total score is the sum of ratings of 28 item scores. The possible IDS-SR total score ranges from 0 to 84. |
Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in the IDS-SR Total Score for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol.
Time Frame: Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
The IDS-SR consists of 30 items, all rated on a 0 to 3 scale with 0 being the "best" rating and 3 being the "worst" rating. Besides item 9, two sub-items 9A and 9B exist, with possible scores of 1, 2 or 3 for item 9A, and 0 or 1 for item 9B. The scores for these two sub-items are not included in the calculation of the total score. Item 11 or item 12 should be completed but not both, and similarly, item 13 or item 14 should be completed but not both. Should items 11 and 12 be rated both, then the maximum of the two scores will be used. The same approach will be used for handling items 13 and 14. The IDS-SR total score is the sum of ratings of 28 item scores. The possible IDS-SR total score ranges from 0 to 84. |
Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) in SDS Item Scores for the Efficacy Sample.
Time Frame: Week 11 and 14
|
The SDS is a self-rated instrument used to measure the effect of the patient's symptoms on work/school, social life, and family/home responsibilities.
For each of the three items, scores range from 0 through 10.
The number most representative of how much each area was disrupted by symptoms is marked along the line from 0 = not at all, to 10 = extremely.
For the work/school item, no response was to be entered if the patient did not work or go to school for reasons unrelated to the disorder and a response therefore not being applicable.
The Mean SDS Score will be calculated over the three item scores.
All three item scores need to be available with the exception of the work/school item score when this item is not applicable.
|
Week 11 and 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) in SDS Item Scores for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol.
Time Frame: Week 11 and 14
|
The SDS is a self-rated instrument used to measure the effect of the patient's symptoms on work/school, social life, and family/home responsibilities.
For each of the three items, scores range from 0 through 10.
The number most representative of how much each area was disrupted by symptoms is marked along the line from 0 = not at all, to 10 = extremely.
For the work/school item, no response was to be entered if the patient did not work or go to school for reasons unrelated to the disorder and a response therefore not being applicable.
The Mean SDS Score will be calculated over the three item scores.
All three item scores need to be available with the exception of the work/school item score when this item is not applicable.
|
Week 11 and 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) Rating Scale Total Score for the Efficacy Sample.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The HAM-D (17-Item) consists of 17 items.
Eight items are rated on a 0 to 2 scale (items 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14, 16 and 17), while nine items (items 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 15) are rated on a 0 to 4 scale (twice the weight of the other items).
For all of these items, 0 is the "best" rating and the highest score (2 or 4) is the "worst" rating.
The sum of the scores from the first 17 items; 0-7 =Normal; 8-13 =mild depression; 14-18 =moderate depression; 19-22 =severe depression; ≥23 =very severe depression.
The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher score indicating worse depressive symptoms.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in HAM-D Rating Scale Total Score for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The HAM-D (17-Item) consists of 17 items.
Eight items are rated on a 0 to 2 scale (items 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14, 16 and 17), while nine items (items 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 15) are rated on a 0 to 4 scale (twice the weight of the other items).
For all of these items, 0 is the "best" rating and the highest score (2 or 4) is the "worst" rating.
The sum of the scores from the first 17 items; 0-7 =Normal; 8-13 =mild depression; 14-18 =moderate depression; 19-22 =severe depression; ≥23 =very severe depression.
The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher score indicating worse depressive symptoms.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in Hamilton Anxiety (HAM-A) Rating Scale Total Score for the Efficacy Sample
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The HAM-A is utilized for the evaluation of anxiety symptoms.
The HAM-A consists of 14 items.
Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 scale.
For all of these items, 0 is the "best" rating and 4 is the "worst" rating.
If no item scores are missing, then the HAM-A total score is the sum of all 14 item scores.
The possible total scores are from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Change From Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) to Week 14 in HAM-A Rating Scale Total Score for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The HAM-A is utilized for the evaluation of anxiety symptoms.
The HAM-A consists of 14 items.
Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 scale.
For all of these items, 0 is the "best" rating and 4 is the "worst" rating.
If no item scores are missing, then the HAM-A total score is the sum of all 14 item scores.
The possible total scores are from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms.
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Week 14 Relative to Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) for the Efficacy Sample.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The MADRS response was defined as >/=50% reduction in MADRS total score from end of Phase A (Week 8).
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Week 14 Relative to Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
The MADRS response was defined as >/=50% reduction in MADRS total score from end of Phase A (Week 8).
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Week 14 Relative to Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) for the Efficacy Sample.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
MADRS remission was defined as </=10 and >/=50% reduction in MADRS total score from end of Phase A (Week 8).
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Week 14 Relative to Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
MADRS remission was defined as </=10 and >/=50% reduction in MADRS total score from end of Phase A (Week 8).
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Scale Response Rate at Week 14 Relative to Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) for the Efficacy Sample.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
CGI-I response was defined as a CGI-I score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Scale Response Rate at Week 14 Relative to Baseline (End of Phase A [Week 8]) for the Efficacy Sample Per the Final Protocol.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 14
|
CGI-I response was defined as a CGI-I score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).
|
Baseline and Week 14
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Newcomer JW, Eriksson H, Zhang P, Meehan SR, Weiss C. Changes in Metabolic Parameters and Body Weight in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Treated With Adjunctive Brexpiprazole: Pooled Analysis of Phase 3 Clinical Studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 1;80(6):18m12680. doi: 10.4088/JCP.18m12680.
- Hobart M, Zhang P, Weiss C, Meehan SR, Eriksson H. Adjunctive Brexpiprazole and Functioning in Major Depressive Disorder: A Pooled Analysis of Six Randomized Studies Using the Sheehan Disability Scale. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Mar 1;22(3):173-179. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy095.
- McIntyre RS, Weiller E, Zhang P, Weiss C. Brexpiprazole as adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder with anxious distress: Results from a post-hoc analysis of two randomised controlled trials. J Affect Disord. 2016 Sep 1;201:116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 12.
- Thase ME, Youakim JM, Skuban A, Hobart M, Augustine C, Zhang P, McQuade RD, Carson WH, Nyilas M, Sanchez R, Eriksson H. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive brexpiprazole 2 mg in major depressive disorder: a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;76(9):1224-31. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09688.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 331-10-228
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mental Disorders
-
Kansas State UniversityAugusta University; Dartmouth College; University of CincinnatiEnrolling by invitationMental Disorders, Severe | Mental Illness PersistentUnited States
-
VA Boston Healthcare SystemUS Department of Veterans AffairsCompletedMental Health DisordersUnited States
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompletedMental Health DisordersUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedMental Health DisordersCongo
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologySt. Olavs HospitalCompletedMental Health DisordersNorway
-
York UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); North York General HospitalCompletedMental Health DisordersCanada
-
University of ManchesterEuropean Research CouncilRecruitingMental Disorders, SevereUnited Kingdom
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...Active, not recruitingMental Disorders, SevereSpain
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillU.S. Department of JusticeCompletedMental Disorders, SevereUnited States
-
Liga Romana pentru Sanatate MintalaPsychiatric Hospital for Chronic Patients Siret, Suceava, RomaniaUnknown
Clinical Trials on OPC-34712 + ADT
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization...CompletedMental Disorders | Depressive Disorder | Depression | Mood Disorders | Depressive Disorder, MajorUnited States, Russian Federation, Hungary, Romania, Ukraine, Canada, Germany
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization...CompletedMajor Depressive DisorderUnited States
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Completed
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization...CompletedSchizophreniaUnited States, Bulgaria, Philippines, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Croatia, India, Korea, Republic of, Slovakia, Taiwan, Ukraine
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization...CompletedSchizophreniaKorea, Republic of, United States, Philippines, Malaysia, Croatia, Serbia, Russian Federation, Ukraine, Romania, Puerto Rico, Colombia, Turkey, Poland, Taiwan, Canada, Latvia, Slovakia, Mexico, Japan
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization...CompletedSchizophrenia | Psychiatric DisordersUnited States
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization...CompletedSchizophreniaUnited States
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization...Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Completed
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization...CompletedMajor Depressive DisorderUnited States
-
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization...CompletedAcute SchizophreniaUnited States, Philippines, Taiwan, Russian Federation, Croatia, Colombia, Mexico, Slovakia