Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Radiochemotherapy for Cancer of the Esophagus or Cardia (NeoRes)

February 25, 2020 updated by: Magnus Nilsson, Karolinska University Hospital

Adjuvant Treatment of Cancer of the Esophagus or Cardia Before Resection With Curative Intent. Comparative Study Between Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy

The purpose of this randomized study is to clarify if neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy gives a higher degree of complete histological response than neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery in patients undergoing treatment for cancer of the esophagus or cardia.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

181

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, 14186
        • Upper Digestive Diseases. Department of surgery, Karolinska University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically verified squamos cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma of the esopohagus or gastric cardia (type II)
  • Tumor located in cervical oesophagus, not requiring laryngo-esophagectomy. Patients with performance status 0-1 axxording to WHO scale and with resectable tumours, as assessed at the prerandomisation evaluation
  • Adequate haemotological function, defined as having WBC > 3 x 10(9)/litre and platelets > 100 x 10 (9)/litre.
  • Adequate renal function defined as having normal serum creatinine level and/or calculated glomerular filtration rate > 60 ml/min.
  • Tumour stage: T1Ni, T2N0, T2N1, T3N0, T3N1, M1a

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy and/or lactation. Women of childbearing ages can be included and provided that adequate contraceptive methods are used
  • Patients with diabetes complications (e.g. rethinopathy, neuropathy) as well as patients with uncontrolled cardiac disease or myocard infarction within 12 months are considered unsuitable for chemoradiotherapy.
  • Concomitant malignancy (< 5 years since diagnosis) that can interfere the interpretation of study results, ongoing antitumoral treatment.
  • Patients being unable tom comply with the protocol
  • Tumor stage T1 N0, T4 NX or TXNXM1b

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Radiochemotherapy
Arm I: Radiochemotherapy + Surgery
Cisplantin 100 mg/m2 day 1. 5-fluoracil 750 mg/m2/24 hours infusion day 1-5. Three cycles. In the chemoradiation arm the radiotherapy start week 4 and continuing until week 7. Dose adjustet according to current LPK and TPK values.
Other Names:
  • Suffering moderate/severe hearing impairment and/or tinnitus cisplatin can be replaced. If adenocarcinoma oxaliplatin.If squamos cell carcinoma carboplatin.
Cisplantin 100 mg/m2 day 1. 5-fluoracil 750 mg/m2/24 hours infusion day 1-5. Three cycles. In the chemoradiation arm the radiotherapy start week 4 and continuing until week 7. Dose adjustet according to current LPK and TPK values.
Other Names:
  • Suffering moderate/severe hearing impairment and/or tinnitus cisplatin can be replaced. If adenocarcinoma oxaliplatin.If squamos cell carcinoma carboplatin.
Active Comparator: Chemotherapy
Arm II: Chemotherapy + surgery
Cisplantin 100 mg/m2 day 1. 5-fluoracil 750 mg/m2/24 hours infusion day 1-5. Three cycles. In the chemoradiation arm the radiotherapy start week 4 and continuing until week 7. Dose adjustet according to current LPK and TPK values.
Other Names:
  • Suffering moderate/severe hearing impairment and/or tinnitus cisplatin can be replaced. If adenocarcinoma oxaliplatin.If squamos cell carcinoma carboplatin.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathological Complete Histological Response (pCR) After Resection Than Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Resectable Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Cardia.
Time Frame: Therapy followed in 14-16 weeks before surgery. After surgery the patients will be followed until 60 weeks after completed therapy.
Chireac tumour regression grade
Therapy followed in 14-16 weeks before surgery. After surgery the patients will be followed until 60 weeks after completed therapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of Respective Neoadjuvant Therapies.
Time Frame: Five years follow up
Safety profile of carrying out radical surgery after respective neoadjuvant therapy.
Five years follow up
HRQOL and Swallowing Function
Time Frame: Entry study up to Five years follow up
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 and disease specific questionnaires (QLQ-OES24/OG25). All items included in the questionnaires are analysed and also separate analysis of dysphagia questionnaires for oesophageal cancer were used, both clinically and psychometrically validated. All questions have four response alternatives (1, not at all; 2:a little, 3: quite a bit, 4: very much), except global scales which comprise seven response alternatives from poor to excellent. Questionnaire responses were transformed lineraly into scores ranging from 0 to 100 according to the EORTC scoring manual. A higher score indicates either more symotoms or better function, depending on the question.
Entry study up to Five years follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Magnus Nilsson, Professor, Karolinska University Hospital, Gastrocentrum
  • Study Chair: Lars Lundell, Professor, Karolinska University Hospital, Gastrocentrum

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 27, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Squamous Cell

Clinical Trials on Chemotherapy

3
Subscribe