An Outcomes Study Comparing the Intralase FS 60 to the Intralase iFS When Performing LASIK Surgery for Nearsightedness

March 5, 2019 updated by: Edward E. Manche, Stanford University

A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Fellow Eyes Undergoing LASIK With the Intralase FS 60 Versus the Intralase IFS

The purpose of the study is to compare the results of LASIK surgery when using two versions of a femtosecond laser in patients with nearsightedness with and without astigmatism.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The patients will have a comprehensive eye examination once they express an interest in the study. This includes a slit lamp examination of the front of the eye and a dilated fundoscopic examination of the back of the eye. If there is any pathology noted that would exclude the patient from the study, then we will inform the patient and make an appropriate referral. if the patient is deemed appropriate for the study after a comprehensive examination included computerized videokeratography, then they can be enrolled. The patient will undergo bilateral simultaneous eye surgery. Which eye is treated with the Intralase FS 60 and which eye is treated with Intralase IFS will be randomized so there is a 50% chance for either eye to receive one treatment. The patients will be seen on the day of surgery, post op day one, one month, three months, six months and one year. The patient will receive topical antibiotics in each eye for one week following the procedure. The patient will receive pred forte 1% ophthalmic drops for one week after treatment. The patient will also receive vigamox ophthalmic drops for four days after treatment. All of this is within the usual and customary standard of care for the treatment of patients undergoing LASIK surgery.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects age 21 and older with healthy eyes. Nearsightedness between -0.25 diopters and -7.00 diopters with or without astigmatism of up to 3.00 diopters.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects age 21 and older with healthy eyes.
  • Nearsightedness between -0.25 diopters and -7.00 diopters with or without astigmatism of up to 3.00 diopters.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects under the age of 21.
  • Patients with excessively thin corneas.
  • Patients with topographic evidence of keratoconus.
  • Patients with ectactic eye disorders.
  • Patients with autoimmune diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity
Time Frame: One year
One year
Changes in 5% low contrast best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: One year
One year
Changes in corneal sensation
Time Frame: One year
One year
Uncorrected Visual Acuity
Time Frame: One year
One year
Stability of refractive outcome
Time Frame: One year
One year
Changes in 25% low contrast best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: One year
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Subjective Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 yr
1 yr

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 3, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SU-05212011-7804
  • Stanford IRB Protocol # 21250

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Astigmatism

Clinical Trials on LASIK with the iFS femtosecond laser

3
Subscribe