Prognostic Value of Clinical and Biological Factors in Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (PRO-R-IPI)

Observational, Post-authorization, Cross-sectional Study to Evaluate the Prognostic Value of Clinical and Biological Factors in Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of clinical and biological factors in patients with refractory/relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The main aim of this study is to compare the prognostic value of R-IPI at diagnosis and relapse, relating it with the obtained response after second line

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

158

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital del Mar
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Clinic i Provincial
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
      • Gerona, Spain
        • Institut Catala d'Oncologia de Girona
      • Granada, Spain
        • H.U. Virgen de las Nieves
      • Jaén, Spain
        • Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén
      • La Coruña, Spain
        • C.H.U. A Coruña
      • León, Spain
        • Hospital de Leon
      • Lugo, Spain
        • Hospital Xeral
      • Lérida, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital 12 de Octubre
      • Madrid, Spain
        • MD Anderson
      • Madrid, Spain
        • H.U. La Paz
      • Madrid, Spain
        • H. Ramon y Cajal
      • Madrid, Spain
        • H. U. La Princesa
      • Madrid, Spain
        • H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón
      • Mallorca, Spain
        • Hospital Son Llatzer
      • Murcia, Spain
        • Hospital Morales Messeguer
      • Murcia, Spain
        • H.U. Virgen de la Arrixaca
      • Málaga, Spain
        • H. Carlos Haya
      • Orense, Spain
        • Complexo Hospitalario de Ourense
      • Palma de Mallorca, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Son Dureta
      • Salamanca, Spain
        • H. Universitario de Salamanca
      • Segovia, Spain
        • H. General de Segovia
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • H.U. Nuestra Señora de Valme
      • Valencia, Spain
        • H. Clínico de Valencia
      • Valencia, Spain
        • H. Arnau de Vilanova
      • Valencia, Spain
        • H. Dr. Peset
      • Valladolid, Spain
        • H. Rio Hortega
      • Valladolid, Spain
        • Hospital Clínico Universitario Valladolid
      • Zamora, Spain
        • H. Virgen de la Concha
      • Ávila, Spain
        • H. Nuestra Señora de Sonsoles
    • Alicante
      • Elda, Alicante, Spain
        • Hospital de Elda
    • Asturias
      • Gijón, Asturias, Spain
        • Hospital de Cabueñes
      • Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
        • H. U. Central de Asturias
    • Barcelona
      • Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
        • H. U. Germans Trias i Pujol
      • Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital General de Granollers
      • Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
        • ICO-DYR
      • Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
        • Althaia
      • Mataró, Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital de Mataro
      • Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Parc Tauli
    • Cantabria
      • Torrelavega, Cantabria, Spain
        • H. Sierrallana
    • Cádiz
      • Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain
        • Hospital General del SAS de Jerez
    • Guipuzcoa
      • San Sebastián, Guipuzcoa, Spain
        • Hospital Galdakao
    • La Coruña
      • Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain
        • H. Clínico U. Santiago de Compostela
    • La Rioja
      • Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
        • Hospital San Pedro
    • Madrid
      • Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
        • H.U. Fundación Alcorcón
      • Getafe, Madrid, Spain
        • H.U.de Getafe
      • Leganés, Madrid, Spain
        • H. Severo Ochoa
    • Málaga
      • Marbella, Málaga, Spain
        • Hospital Costa del Sol
    • Navarra
      • Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
        • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
      • Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
        • Hospital de Navarra
    • Tenerife
      • La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
        • H. Universitario de Canarias
    • Toledo
      • Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain
        • H. Nuestra Señora del Prado
    • Vizcaya
      • Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain
        • H. Basurto
    • Álava
      • Vitoria, Álava, Spain
        • H. Txagorritxu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Description

  • Age 18 > years old
  • Patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after first line treatment with rituximab, with or without transplantation. Patients must have finished a rescue treatment including rituximab
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
refractory/relapsed LDCBG
patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
R-IPI Index (Revised International Prognostic Index)
Time Frame: At diagnoses
Data will be recorded from diagnosis to second line response, an expected average of 7 months
At diagnoses
R-IPI Index (Revised International Prognostic Index)
Time Frame: At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment, an average of 2 years
The IPI is based on the evaluation of 5 clinical factors: age > 60 years Ann Arbor stage III or IV disease > 1 extra nodal site European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) _ 2, increased serum LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) levels Revised IPI (R-IPI) evaluates the same parameters, but groups them differently to form 3 prognostic groups of patients with significantly different progression-free survival and overall survival outcomes.
At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment, an average of 2 years
Predictive Value of R-IPI at Diagnosis
Time Frame: At diagnosis
At diagnosis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bcl-2 Expression
Time Frame: At diagnosis
immunohistochemical reaction of cells with Bcl-2 antibody
At diagnosis
Bcl-2 Expression
Time Frame: At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment
immunohistochemical reaction of cells with Bcl-2 antibody
At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment
Bcl-6 Expression
Time Frame: At diagnosis
immunohistochemical reaction of cells with Bcl-6 antibody
At diagnosis
Bcl-6 Expression
Time Frame: At the beginning of the second line of treatment
immunohistochemical reaction of cells with Bcl-6 antibody
At the beginning of the second line of treatment
p-53 Expression
Time Frame: At diagnosis
immunohistochemical reaction of cells with p-53 antibody
At diagnosis
p53 Expression
Time Frame: At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment
immunohistochemical reaction of cells with p-53 antibody
At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment
Multiple Myeloma Oncogene 1 (MUM-1) Expression
Time Frame: At diagnosis
immunohistochemical reaction of cells with MUM-1 antibody
At diagnosis
MUM-1 Expression
Time Frame: At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment
immunohistochemical reaction of cells with MUM-1 antibody
At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) Performance Status
Time Frame: At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment
ECOG=0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction ECOG=5: Exitus
At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment
Ann Arbor Staging
Time Frame: At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment
Ann Arbor=I: Best condition Ann Arbor=IV: Worst condition
At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment
Response to First Line of Treatment
Time Frame: After first line treatment

Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions for at least 8 weeks.

Partial response (PR): At least a 50% dicrease in the sum of the products of two measurements (the maximum diameter of a tumor and the largest diameter perpendicular to this maximum diameter) of 6 biggest individual tumors. Not increased of measure of other tumors, spleen or liver Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 50% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions during or at the end of the treatment.

After first line treatment
Response to Second Line of Treatment
Time Frame: After second line of treatment

Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions for at least 8 weeks.

Partial response (PR): At least a 50% dicrease in the sum of the products of two measurements (the maximum diameter of a tumor and the largest diameter perpendicular to this maximum diameter) of 6 biggest individual tumors. Not increased of measure of other tumors, spleen or liver Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 50% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions during or at the end of the treatment.

After second line of treatment
Relationship Between Global Response Rate to 2nd (Second) Line of Treatment and Bcl-2 Expression at Diagnosis
Time Frame: At diagnosis
Global response rate was assessed using the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines. Responses are: complete response, partial response, stable disease, progression and relapse
At diagnosis
Relationship Between Global Response Rate to 2nd Line of Treatment and Bcl-6 Expression at Diagnosis
Time Frame: At diagnosis
Global response rate was assessed using the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines. Responses are: complete response, partial response, stable disease, progression and relapse
At diagnosis
Relationship Between Global Response Rate to 2nd Line of Treatment and p53 Expression at Diagnosis
Time Frame: At diagnosis
Global response rate was assessed using the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines. Responses are: complete response, partial response, stable disease, progression and relapse
At diagnosis
Relationship Between Global Response Rate to 2nd Line of Treatment and Multiple Myeloma Oncogene 1 (MUM1) Expression at Diagnosis
Time Frame: At diagnosis
Global response rate was assessed using the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines. Responses are: complete response, partial response, stable disease, progression and relapse
At diagnosis

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Carlos Panizo, PhD, Grupo Español de Linfomas/Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 9, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

3
Subscribe