Maxigesic 325 Acute Dental Pain Study

November 13, 2018 updated by: AFT Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

Maxigesic 325 Acute Dental Pain Study: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Parallel Group Comparison of the Effects of Maxigesic 325 Versus Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen and Placebo in Participants With Acute Dental Pain

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the analgesic effects of Maxigesic USA are greater than acetaminophen, ibuprofen or placebo.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The combination of 500mg acetaminophen and 150mg ibuprofen has been shown to improve analgesia compared with the individual components, when given as 2 tablets (i.e. total of 1,000/300 mg) 4 times a day.

Recent concerns over the safety of acetaminophen have led to some regulatory agencies restricting the maximum dose of acetaminophen per tablet to 325 mg, while maintaining the maximum daily dose of 4000mg per day.

A dosing regimen of three tablets of Maxigesic 325 four times a day gives a total daily dose of 3900mg acetaminophen and 1170mg ibuprofen.

The primary objective of the study is to compare time-adjusted SPID of the VAS pain intensity scores up to 48 hours after the first dose of study medication among the four study groups.

Secondary objectives are:

To compare the time to onset of pain relief after the first dose of study drug defined as (i) perceptible and (ii) meaningful pain relief among the four study groups using the two stopwatch method.

To compare the maximum VAS pain scores up to 48 hours after the first dose of study medication among the four study groups.

To compare the response rates (response rate to be defined as the percentage of participants who reduce their pain intensity scores by at least 50% compared with the baseline VAS measure) among the four study groups.

To compare the time to peak reduction in VAS pain intensity scores following the first dose of study medication among the four study groups.

To compare the time to requirement for rescue medication among the four study groups.

To compare the percentage of participants who use rescue medication among the four study groups.

To compare the amount of rescue medication used (defined as number of tablets) among the four study groups.

To compare the categorical global pain rating among the four study groups.

Safety:

To compare adverse event rates for the 48-hour study period and up to Day 30 among the four treatment groups.

To compare the incidence of known specific NSAID and paracetamol side effects (e.g. GI ulceration or bleeding, indigestion/stomach pain, post-operative bleeding, bronchospasm, skin rashes, water retention, renal failure, thromboembolic events and evidence of clinical hepatitis) during the 48-hour study period and up to Day 30 among the four study groups.

Planned hospital admissions and/or surgical operations for an illness or disease which existed before the study drug was given or the participant was randomized in the study will not be considered adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

408

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Auckland, New Zealand, 0622
        • Clinical Solutions Ltd.
      • Christchurch, New Zealand
        • Southern Clinical Trials
    • Waikato
      • Hamilton, Waikato, New Zealand
        • Clinical Trial New Zealand
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Premier Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provides written informed consent before initiation of any study-related procedures.
  • Males and females aged at least 10 years and not more than 60 years old on the day of consent.
  • Undergoing dental surgery for the extraction of at least 2 impacted third molar teeth.
  • A resting VAS pain intensity score at baseline (within 6 hours after the completion of surgery) of greater than or equal to 40 mm on a 100 mm VAS scale with 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has taken any NSAID or acetaminophen within 12 hours prior to the stat of surgery other than asprin less than or equal to 150 mg/day
  • Subjects who have received any anaesthetics within 24 hours prior to surgery
  • Hypersensitivity to opioids
  • Known to be pregnant or possibly pregnant
  • Women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to take adequate contraceptive precautions, i.e., hormonal contraceptive, an intrauterine device, double-barrier method, or abstinence. A women of childbearing potential is defined as any female who is less than 2 years post-menopausal or has not undergone a partial or total hysterectomy or surgical sterilization, e.g. bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy.
  • Women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to undergo an urine pregnancy test.
  • Suffering from a neurological disorder relating to pain perception or any acute or chronic condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the subject unsuitable from an efficacy or safety perspective.
  • In the opinion of the investigator, unable to understand the visual analogue pain score or comply with the protocol requirements.
  • Currently, or in the last 30 days, has been in a clinical trial involving another study drug.
  • Currently treated with an ACE inhibitor, warfarin, steroid (other than nasal steroids or topical steroids with the approval of the investigator) cyclosporin, tacrolimus or methotrexate, or any other medication felt by the investigator to interfere with safety or efficacy evaluations.
  • Participant weight < 50 kg or > 120 kg.
  • Has a history of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Suffering from any other disease or condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, means that it would not be in the participants best interests to participant in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Maxigesic 325
Acetaminophen 325mg + ibuprofen 97.5mg per tablet, two tablets every 6 hours, orally
Maxigesic USA (acetaminophen 325 mg + ibuprofen 97.5mg), three tablets four times a day with food for 48 hours
Other Names:
  • Maxigesic
Active Comparator: Acetaminophen
Acetaminophen 325mg per tablet (standard dose acetaminophen), two tablets every 6 hours, orally
Acetaminophen 325 mg, 3 tablets four times a day, with food for 48 hours
Other Names:
  • paracetamol
Active Comparator: Ibuprofen
Ibuprofen 97.5mg per tablet (i.e. low dose ibuprofen), two tablets every 6 hours, orally
Ibuprofen 97.5mg, three tablets four times a day, with food for 48 hours.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo tablets, every 6 hours, orally
placebo, three tablets four times a day, with food for 48 hours

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SPID (Summed Pain Intensity Differences)
Time Frame: 48 hours afte the first dose

The time-adjusted Summed Pain Intensity Differences (SPIDs) of the VAS pain intensity scores up to 48 hours after the first dose of study medication.

This was calculated from the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity scores recorded during the 48 hours double blind treatment period, with the last measure taken just prior to the final dose of blinded study medication. The visual analogue scale is 100mm long with 0= no pain and 100=worst pain imaginable. The Visual Analogue Scale It is expected that treatments which can provide superior analgesic effect will demonstrate a greater Summed Pain Intensity Difference.

48 hours afte the first dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Currie, Doctor, Clinical Trial New Zealand

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 22, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Pain

Clinical Trials on Maxigesic 325

3
Subscribe