Secondary Intention Wound Healing Versus Micrografting in Patients Undergoing Mohs Surgery (MomelanMohs)

June 18, 2014 updated by: Alexandra Kimball, Massachusetts General Hospital
This study evaluates a novel micrografting technique to see how it will influence the healing rate and cosmetic result of second intention wounds. The graft harvesting and micrografting process was designed by MoMelan Technologies The Epidermal Expansion System, which is composed of a commercially available Blister Generation Device and the Microblister Generation and Excision Device (MBGED), will generate an array of small microblisters and transfer the micrografts to a sterile dressing (Tegaderm™ - an FDA approved wound dressing) for application to the subject's surgical area. The investigators predict that applying expanded micrografts to wounds that otherwise would have healed by second intention alone will hasten healing and possible reduce scarring.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Participants with a scalp wound s/p Mohs procedure will be randomized to a micrografting technique intervention or to no intervention/heal with secondary intention alone (control). Intervention consists of harvesting skin micrografts (1.75mm) from pigmented skin using the Microblister generation and excision device and transfer the micrografts to a sterile dressing for application to the participants scalp wound. Percent wound re-epithelialization will be compared between two groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Mgh Curtis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Between 40-75 years old
  2. Status post Mohs procedure on the scalp with a wound that would otherwise be allowed to heal by second intention
  3. Superficial would-at deepest of 2.0 mm or to superficial fat, but not deep to muscle
  4. Area is less then 6 cm2 (wound diameter less than 2cm)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patients who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant
  2. Abnormal bleeding observed during initial Mohs procedure that would suggest a higher risk of post-operative bleeding
  3. Subjects currently on immunosuppressive medications, chemotherapy or a cytotoxic agent
  4. Participation in another interventional study with potential exposure to an investigational drug within past 30 days or planned study entry within 90 days after study entrance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Micrografting
Several small pieces of skin, each measuring 1.75 mm in diameter will be harvested from a normal pigmented area using a commercially available suction blister device. This will be attached to a sterile dressing that will be placed on the surgical wound.
Several small pieces of skin, each measuring 1.75 mm in diameter will be harvested from a normal pigmented area using a commercially available suction blister device. This will be attached to a sterile dressing that will be placed on the surgical wound.
No Intervention: No intervention
No intervention will be performed. Subject will receive dressings that are standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of Wound Re-epithelialization
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexandra B Kimball, MD, MPH, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

September 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2010p002614

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Impaired Wound Healing

Clinical Trials on Micrografting

3
Subscribe