Comparing Lipiodol/Ethanol With Drug-eluting Beads (DEB) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

August 30, 2017 updated by: University of Minnesota

Prospective Study Comparing Lipiodol Plus Ethanol Solution Compared With Drug-Eluting Beads for Trans-arterial Chemoembolization of Liver in Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma lesions is an accepted and frequently used method for the palliative or curative treatment of these lesions. These attempts are being made to make these patients a better candidate for liver transplant or to provide palliation for their condition.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized prospective study with two arms, Drug-Eluting Beads with doxorubicin (DEB) and lipiodol ethanol mixture (LEM), with the goal to show non-inferiority of LEM, which if true will facilitate a simple alternative to DEBs. Patients will be randomized to one arm of the study and will remain in that arm if they need to have more embolization in the future. Both of the mentioned methods (DEB and LEM) fall within the standard of care.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child-Pugh class A or B
  • Biopsy proven HCC or hypervascular mass per European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria
  • Patient not a candidate for surgical resection or percutaneous ablation
  • age > 18 years old and able to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child-Pugh class C
  • Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score >16
  • Extrahepatic disease
  • Bilateral or main portal vein thrombus
  • Total bilirubin > 2.2
  • Serum albumin < 2.6
  • Life expectancy < 2 months
  • Uncorrected INR > 2
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status > 2
  • Tumor burden > 50% liver volume
  • Hepatofugal portal venous flow

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Drug-Eluting Beads with Doxorubicin
Drug-Eluting Beads (DEB) with Doxorubicin is administered via beads that release it to the liver through a groin puncture site and delivered via catheter through the vessels that feed the liver.
One treatment of Drug-Eluting Beads (DEB) with Doxorubicin administered to the liver through a groin puncture site and delivered through the vessels that feed the liver (per standard of care).
Other Names:
  • Doxorubicin
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Lipiodol Ethanol Mixture (LEM)
Lipiodol Ethanol Mixture (LEM) is administered to the liver through a groin puncture site and delivered via catheter through the vessels that feed the liver.
One treatment of Lipiodol Ethanol Mixture (LEM) is administered to the liver through a groin puncture site and delivered through the vessels that feed the liver (per standard of care).
Other Names:
  • LEM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients with Post-Embolization Syndrome
Time Frame: Week 6 Post Intervention
Count of patients with post-embolizaation syndrome reported which includes fatigue, anorexia, nausea, fever.
Week 6 Post Intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients with Encephalopathy After Embolization
Time Frame: Week 6 Post Intervention
Count of patients who had encephalopathy after embolization.
Week 6 Post Intervention
Changes in Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6 After Intervention
Changes (noted as a score of 0 [not at all] to 4 [very much]; total score ranges from 1-180) in the different aspects of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) quality of life questionnaire (a 45-item self-report instrument designed to measure health-related quality of life in patients with hepatobiliary cancers).
Baseline and Week 6 After Intervention
Comparison of Liver Function Tests Results
Time Frame: Day 0 and Week 6 Post Intervention
List of results for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), albumin (Alb), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALKP), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), Bilirubin (T, D), platelets (Plt), international normalized ratio (INR - prothrombin time), Child-Pugh score.
Day 0 and Week 6 Post Intervention
Imaging Response
Time Frame: Week 6 Post Intervention
Determined by European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria a set of non-invasive criteria for HCC in cirrhotic patients. The diagnosis is established if two imaging modalities (US, CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) show a coincidental nodule with arterial hypervascularization regardless of AFP levels, or if a single modality shows a lesion when the AFP levels are more than 400 ng/ml. Histologic diagnosis is required if the patient is non-cirrhotic or if the lesions are smaller than 2 cm.
Week 6 Post Intervention
Number of Patients with Successful Liver Transplant
Time Frame: Week 6 After Intervention
Week 6 After Intervention
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Week 6 After Intervention
Determined by date of death or date censored.
Week 6 After Intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erik Cressman, M.D., Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 9, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Drug-Eluting Beads (DEB) with Doxorubicin

3
Subscribe