Comparison of Flutiform, Fluticasone and Seretide in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Asthma in Paediatric Patients

October 22, 2018 updated by: Mundipharma Research Limited

A Double-blind, Double Dummy, Randomised, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Flutiform pMDI With Fluticasone pMDI and With Seretide pMDI in Paediatric Subjects Aged 5 to Less Than 12 Years With Moderate to Severe Persistent Reversible Asthma

This is a comparator study to assess safety and efficacy of Flutiform compared with Fluticasone pMDI and Seretide pMDI in paediatric asthma patients with moderate to severe persistent, reversible asthma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a study involving a 2-4 week run-in phase followed by a 12 week double blind treatment phase. During the run-in phase, all subjects receive Flixotide. In the treatment phase subjects will be randomised to one of the 3 treatment groups and will receive active Flutiform and placebo Flixotide or Active Seretide and placebo Flixotide or active Flixotide and either placebo seretide or placebo Flutiform. Efficacy will be assessed by lung function tests, asthma symptoms, sleep disturbance due to asthma and rescue medication use. Safety will be assessed by adverse events, lab tests, urinary cortisol and vital signs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

498

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria
      • Ostrava-Marianske Hory, Czechia
        • Alergologie Skopkova s.r.o
      • Kiskunhalas, Hungary
        • Illés és Ádám Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Bt.
      • New Dehli, India
      • Tarnow, Poland
        • Alergo-Med Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Lekarska Sp.z.o.o.
      • Deva, Hunedoara, Romania
        • Spitalul Judetean de Urgenta Deva
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
      • Odessa, Ukraine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Male and Female subjects 5 to <12 years old.
  2. Known history of moderate to severe persistent reversible asthma1 for ≥ 6 months prior to the screening visit.
  3. Demonstrated FEV1 of ≥ 60% to ≤ 90% for predicted normal values (Polgar 1971) during the screening period following appropriate withholding of asthma medications (if applicable):

    • No LABA use within 12 hours and/or no SABA use within 6 hours of the PFT
    • No use of inhaled ICS-LABA asthma therapy within 12 hours of the PFT
    • Inhaled corticosteroids are allowed on the day of screening
  4. Documented reversibility of ≥ 15% in FEV1 in the screening period
  5. Current use of an inhaled corticosteroid for asthma at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
  6. Inadequate asthma control on an ICS alone at a dose of ≤ 500 µg fluticasone equivalents/day, OR controlled asthma on an ICS-LABA combination at a ICS dose of ≤ 200 µg fluticasone equivalents/day
  7. Demonstrated satisfactory technique in the use of the pMDI and spacer device
  8. Can perform spirometry adequately
  9. Willing and able to enter information in the electronic diary with the help of a parent or guardian, if necessary and attend all study visits
  10. Willing and able to substitute pre-study prescribed inhaled asthma medication for the entire duration of the study
  11. If a female subject is post menarche a urine pregnancy test may be undertaken at the discretion of the investigator and the subjects' parent(s) /legal representative. This test must be negative.
  12. Written informed consent and assent obtained as per national law

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Near fatal or life-threatening (including intubation) asthma within the past year
  2. Hospitalisation or an emergency visit for asthma within the past 6 months
  3. History of systemic (injectable or oral) corticosteroid medication within 1 month of the screening visit
  4. Current or prior non-response or partial response only to an ICS-LABA combination1
  5. Evidence of a clinically unstable disease, as determined by medical history, clinical laboratory tests, and physical examination that, in the Investigator's opinion, preclude entry into the study. "Clinically significant" is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would put the subject at risk through study participation, or which would affect the outcome of the study
  6. In the Investigator's opinion a clinically significant upper or lower respiratory infection within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
  7. Significant, non-reversible active pulmonary disease (e.g. cystic fibrosis, bronchiecstasis, tuberculosis)
  8. Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-positive status
  9. Current smoking history within 12 months prior to the screening visit
  10. Current evidence of alcohol or substance abuse within 12 months prior to the screening visit
  11. Subjects who have taken β- blocking agents, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, astemizole (Hismanal), quinidine type antiarrythmics, or potent CYP 3A4 inhibitors such as ketoconazole within 1 week prior to the screening visit
  12. Current use of medications, other than those allowed in the protocol, that in the investigator's opinion will have an effect on bronchospasm and/or pulmonary function
  13. Current evidence of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to test medications or components
  14. Receipt of an Investigational medicinal product within 30 days of the screening visit
  15. Current participation in a clinical study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Flutiform
50/5ug (fluticasone/formoterol) 2 puffs twice daily
Active Comparator: Seretide
50/25 ug (fluticasone/salmeterol) 2 puffs twice daily
Active Comparator: Flixotide
50ug 2 puffs twice daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To show superiority in the efficacy of Flutiform pMDI 50/5μg (2 puffs bid) versus fluticasone pMDI 50 μg (2 puffs bid).
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Change from pre-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) in litres at baseline to 2 hours post-dose FEV1 at the end of the 12 week treatment period.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Show non-inferiority in the efficacy of Flutiform to Seretide
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Change from pre-dose FEV1 at baseline to 2 hours post-dose FEV1 at Day 1 and FEV1 AUC0-4 at Day 1 and Week 12 (Flutiform vs Seretide)
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

January 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Flutiform

3
Subscribe