Spinal Cord Stimulation for Diabetic Polyneuropathy

January 28, 2019 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

A Randomized, Comparison Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Standard of Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Diabetic Polyneuropathy

To obtain preliminary estimates of the safety and efficacy of the ANS Eon™ Implantable Pulse Generator with ANS leads in the treatment of subjects with diabetic polyneuropathy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is a medication arm and a stimulation arm. Patients will randomized to one or the other. If patients are randomized to the medication arm, after 6 months they have the option of going into the stimulation arm. There is a 3 week trial which includes a crossover period from "no stimulation" to subthreshold stimulation. The 3rd week patients will receive "optimal" stimulation. If they qualify, they will be implanted with the permanent device.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64132
        • Midwest Neurosurgery Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is 18 years of age or older
  2. The subject has signed and received a copy of an informed consent form after the nature of the study has been fully explained.
  3. The subject has a clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  4. The subject has an A1C less than or equal to 10% within the last 3 months.
  5. The subject has been on a stable diabetic therapy for at least 3 months without hospitalizations for control of diabetes.
  6. The subject has a documented clinical diagnosis of painful diabetic distal symmetric sensory/motor polyneuropathy using the LANSS (Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs) pain scale score of 12 or greater and the TNS (total neuropathy score) score of 20 or greater.
  7. The subject has bilateral, moderate to severe pain from diabetic polyneuropathy for the previous 3 months.
  8. The subject has a VAS of > 4 at Baseline, on a stable analgesic regimen consisting of any one or combination of the following agents: anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and opioids for 1 month.
  9. The subject has been shown to be refractory to conservative therapy by failing a minimum of 3 conservative treatments at least one of which is a medication specifically for diabetic polyneuropathy of adequate dose and duration
  10. Female subject has a negative pregnancy test.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is unwilling or unable, in the opinion of the investigator, to comply with study instructions.
  2. Subject has other severe pain that could confound the assessment of pain due to diabetic polyneuropathy.
  3. Subject has a neuropathy that the investigator considers is not due to diabetes (e.g., significant vasculitis, collagen vascular disorder, medications known to cause neuropathies, history of familial neuropathy, drug or alcohol abuse, hepatitis, HIV, infection or pernicious anemia)
  4. Subject has had any amputation.
  5. Subject has a diagnosis within the past 1 year of major psychiatric disturbance. Exclusionary psychiatric diagnoses include the following Axis I disorders (DSM-IVR criteria): major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder or somatoform disorders. The Axis II disorder of borderline personality is also excluded.
  6. Subject has co-existent, major systemic disease(s) that would interfere with interpretation of study results (e.g. malignancy, poorly controlled diabetes, ischemic cardiac disease, profound autonomic dysfunction or any other disease in the opinion of the investigator.)
  7. Subject who has an abnormal PT, PTT, bleeding time or platelet count that might interfere with therapy.
  8. Subject is currently participating in or has, within the past 30 days, participated in a study of another investigational drug or device.
  9. Subject has a history of substance abuse within the past 2 years.
  10. Subject has a demand-type pacemaker or implanted cardiac defibrillator.
  11. Subject who require diathermy or MRIs.
  12. Subject with any metallic implants that might interfere with this therapy in the opinion of the investigator;
  13. Subject who has an implanted medication pump or implanted neurostimulation device.
  14. Subject who currently has an active infection.
  15. Subject who currently has foot ulcers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Subthreshold programming
During one of the first 2 weeks of the trial the subject will be randomized to a subthreshold stimulation arm. They will be blinded and receiving therapy, but will it will be delivered at a level (subthreshold) that they will not feel the stimulation.
Appropriate programming based on subject's preference of programs.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo or Stimulation off arm
During one of the first two weeks of the study, the patient will be randomized to a no stimulation arm. They will be blinded and will not be receiving therapy.
Placebo
Appropriate programming based on subject's preference of programs.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Optimal stimulation programming
During the third week of the trial period, all subjects will receive optimal stimulation.
Appropriate programming based on subject's preference of programs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 24 months
The VAS is a 100mm line that indicates severity of pain progression
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device related and serious adverse events
Time Frame: 24 months +/- 6 months depending on study arm randomization
All adverse events that are classified as device related and/or serious will be assessed.
24 months +/- 6 months depending on study arm randomization
Neuropathy Impairment in the Lower Limbs (NIS-LL)
Time Frame: 24 months

Neuropathy Impairment Score in the Lower Limbs (NIS-LL):

The NIS-LL is a quantitative neurological examination that evaluates changes in motor, sensory and reflex activity in the lower limbs. The test has 14 items: 8 to evaluate muscle strength (64 possible points), 2 items to evaluate reflex activity (8 possible points), and 4 items to evaluate sensory activity (16 possible points). All items are tested bilaterally and the maximum score is 88 points.

24 months
Nerve conduction studies and Electromyogram (EMG)
Time Frame: 24 months
Electromyography (EMG) is a technique for evaluating and recording the electrical activity of muscles. This test will be performed according to standard practice.
24 months
Inflammatory mediators (IL-6, IL-1β, and CRP)
Time Frame: 24 months
A complete blood count (CBC), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) and PT, (Prothrombin Time), PTT (Partial Thromboplastin Time) will be performed as well as assessment of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. HbA1c is used to evaluate the amount of glycosylated hemoglobin in the blood which is indicative of blood glucose levels. IL-6 and IL-1β, and CRP are indicators of an inflammatory response and are consistently associated with diabetic polyneuropathy.
24 months
Vascular Doppler
Time Frame: 24 months
A Doppler ultrasound uses reflected sound waves to evaluate blood as it flows through the major arteries and veins of the arms, legs, and neck. This test will be performed according to standard practice.
24 months
Intra-epidermal skin biopsy
Time Frame: 24 months
A skin biopsy will be performed to assess damage to nerve fibers due to DPN.
24 months
Short Form 36 (SF-36) Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
The SF-36 is a 36-item tool for measuring health related quality of life from the patient's point of view. The items on the questionnaire are scored and divided into 8 sub-scales, and each subscale is also categorized as a physical component or a mental component.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Polyneuropathy

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe