Influence of Naproxen on Heterotropic Bone Formation Following Hip Arthroscopy

July 11, 2022 updated by: Stephen Aoki, University of Utah
In a brief summary the study would like to evaluate the effectiveness of Naproxen in preventing radiographically detected heterotopic ossification following hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Heterotopic bone formation (HO) is a potentially serious complication of hip surgery. HO, defined as the formation of normal bone in an abnormal soft tissue location, results from alteration in the normal regulation of skeletogenesis. Although most patients remain asymptomatic despite HO development, two articles that included 10,826 patients from 37 studies suggest HO may be associated with substantial compromise of function and range of motion even at low grades.In a large pooled incidence study, HO was estimated to be 43% in 59,121 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, and 51% in 998 patients after acetabular trauma.

Few studies have reported on the incidence of HO following hip arthroscopy. However, HO is an increasingly reported complication of arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement(FAI). In a comparison of complications following arthroscopic treatment of FAI in 8 case-series, ectopic ossification occurred in up to 6% of cases and accounted for 10 of the 19 reported complications. Additionally, one recent study reported an HO incidence of 33% (5 out of 15 patients) following hip arthroscopy in patients not prophylaxed with NSAID therapy. In our experience, HO occurs at a comparable or higher rate of 10% in those undergoing this procedure. The formation of ectopic ossification is triggered as a result of muscle damage during introduction of hip portals and is potentially augmented by seeding of bone shavings in the soft tissues created during burring of the femoral neck.

Prophylaxis of HO targets the biochemical mechanisms of heterotopic bone formation by: 1) Disrupting inductive signaling pathways, 2) Altering osteoprogenitor cells in target tissues, and 3) Modifying the environment conductive to formation of heteroptic bone. The two mainstays of therapy are low dose radiation treatment and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs). The efficacies of these treatments were found to be equivalent by Burd et al in 166 randomized patients. However, NSAID therapy was shown to be considerably more cost effective with lower rates of morbidity. Large randomized studies have subsequently shown large reductions in the incidence of HO using NSAID therapy in the perioperative period. The Cochrane review of 16 randomized trials in 5000 patients found one-half to two-thirds reduction in HO with indomethacin.Even less potent NSAID therapy has been effective in reducing rates of HO. Fransen et al reported a 30% reduction in HO during the HIPAID trial comparing perioperative ibuprofen with placebo in nearly 1000 patients. The two groups had no statistical difference in functional outcome despite the higher incidence of HO in the prophylaxed group.

While NSAID therapy has been effective in reducing the incidence of HO, it is associated with potentially serious side affects. Fransen et al found 202 GI side effects in a metaanalysis of 4328 patients taking NSAIDs for HO prophylaxis.1 Of these, 138 were minor (e.g. nausea, dyspepsia, diarrhea) and 64 were major (e.g. hematemesis or melena). Overall, there was a 31% increase in the risk of GI side effects among patients taking NSAIDs. Furthermore, NSAID therapy could impair bone and/or soft tissue healing following this. These side affects could negate the benefit of NSAID therapy, especially if HO is asymptomatic in the majority of patients.

We hypothesize that NSAID prophylaxis of HO may have a role in hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. All NSAIDs tested, with the exception of aspirin, have resulted in significant decreases in the incidence of HO following hip surgery including less potent regimens such as ibuprofen 1200 mg/day. Naproxen offers the advantage of twice daily dosing with similar potency to ibuprofen. It is readily available and inexpensive. Furthermore, in an unpublished series of 50 patients prescribed naproxen following hip arthroscopy for FAI, we have had no cases of HO at 6 month follow up compared to a 5-10% rate in patients who received no prophylaxis. We propose testing our hypothesis that perioperative naproxen will reduce the incidence of HO following hip arthroscopy in a placebo controlled, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

108

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • University Of Utah Orthopedics Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is 18-80 years of age.
  • The patient has provided written informed consent.
  • The patient is scheduled for hip arthroscopy surgery for treatment of FAI
  • The patient has an ASA of I, II, or III.
  • The patients understands the explanation of the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has history of a major GI bleeding event
  • The patients has a history of renal impairment or creatinine > 1.5
  • The patient has taken NSAIDs within 48 hours of surgery or in the perioperative period
  • The patient has a history of heterotopic ossification following surgery
  • The patient has a hypersensitivity reaction to Naproxen
  • The patient is undergoing a concomitant procedure in addition to treatment of FAI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Naproxen
• Group 1: Naproxen 500 mg twice daily for three weeks following surgery beginning postoperative day #1
• Group 1: Naproxen 500 mg twice daily for three weeks following surgery beginning postoperative day #1
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
• Group 2: Placebo twice daily for three weeks following surgery beginning postoperative day #1
• Group 2: Placebo twice daily for three weeks following surgery beginning postoperative day #1
Other Names:
  • Placebo Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with documented Heterotopic Ossification (HO) in the Naproxen group vs Placebo group
Time Frame: 75 days after surgery
The hypothesis is that there will be fewer instances of HO in the Naproxen group compared to the Placebo group.
75 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with adverse events in the Naproxen group vs Placebo group.
Time Frame: Data outcome collected 4 weeks post operatively
Adverse events include GI upset, GI bleed, Kidney failure, Drug reactions and Healing problems.
Data outcome collected 4 weeks post operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Aoki, M.D., University Of Utah Orthopedics Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heterotopic Ossification

Clinical Trials on Naproxen

3
Subscribe