Conventional Verses Ultrasound Guided Arteria Cannulation, With and Without Local Anesthesia

January 30, 2013 updated by: Marlene A Hansen, Stud.med

Conventional vs. Ultrasound Guided Arteria Cannulation, With and Without Local Anesthesia

The aim of the project is to compare two methods for arterial cannulation. The traditional method with ultrasound guided cannulation. The investigators goal is to improve this procedure to reduce pain and complications.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The practice of placing vascular catheters is used many times every day at almost every hospital. It is a safe procedure which generally does not imply problems. Though the procedural optimum aren't reached. The procedure still fails some times and induce complications. When the catheter is placed using the traditional method the pulse is palpated by the operator's fingers. This is only to be done near the hand wrist. In this position the catheter steadiness is fragile but because the pulse can't be sensed more proximal the operator is forced to choose this position. This it though a problem that can be solved by non invasive visualization technology. Ultrasound-guidance for central vascular access is already well-established. However, in recent years ultrasound-guidance for peripheral vascular access has gained popularity too. The evidence of multiple studies demonstrates increased success rate and reduced complication rate with ultrasound compared to blind landmark technique for vascular catheter placement.

In recent years there have been both procedural technique and technology improvements in the field of ultrasound. This has led to the improvement of procedural catheterisation techniques that now can be done by novices with higher attempt success rate than traditional method. One technique that is gaining success is the short-axis-out-of-plane technique (SAX-OOP) with dynamic-needle-tip-tracking (DNTT).Using the ultrasound machine the needle can be placed in a more proximal direction on the forearm and the investigators believe that by the help of the exposed procedure on the monitor many complications can be reduced.

Hypothesis; Firstly the investigators hypothesize that the pain induced by the conventional method inclusive preoperational lidocaine injection will be the same or more intense than using DNTT without local anesthesia. Secondly the investigators hypothesize that the use of DNTT for the placement of the arterial catheter will decrease the time spend, amount of complications (hematoma), the number of pricks, the number of utilized catheters compared to the traditional palpation method. Thirdly the investigators claim that the best anatomical place to put the catheter isn't always corresponding with the spot chosen by palpation, which increase the number of failures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jylland
      • Aarhus, Jylland, Denmark, 8200
        • Anæstesiologisk-Intensiv afdeling I

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 20-90 years
  • Fulfill the criteria of an operation
  • Routine need of an arterial needle

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of patient consent
  • Ultrasound identified plaques in the radial artery or ultrasound verified positive Allens test or traditional positive Allens test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ultrasound guided arterial cannulation
The arterial needle is placed using ultrasound monitoring for guiding the operator.
arterial catheterisation in Arterial Radialis
Other Names:
  • ICD10 I95.9
Active Comparator: Conventional cannulation
the arterial needle is placed using the traditional method and lidocaine. The operator decides where to place the needle in the forearm
arterial catheterisation in Arterial Radialis
Other Names:
  • ICD10 I95.9

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score on visual analog scale
Time Frame: 5 minutes
The primary outcome is the subjective feeling of pain following the two methods.
5 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time spend on the procedure
Time Frame: 1 day
Time will be measured from the point where 1) the operator starts searching for the patients plus or 2) the operator starts examining the patient with the ultrasound machine. The time will be stopped at the time where the catheter is successfully placed.
1 day
Number of utilized needles
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
number of pricks
Time Frame: 1 day
a prick is defined as eruption of the skin
1 day
number of withdrawals
Time Frame: 1 day
a withdrawal is defined as backwards movement of the needle or the needle+catheter.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marlene Aa Hansen, stud.med, University of Aarhus

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 22, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 31, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Sloth1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on arterial catheterisation

3
Subscribe