Evaluation of Walking After Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Inhibitory 1Hz in Vascular Hemiplegia (rTMS)

August 5, 2016 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Evaluation of Walking After Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Inhibitory 1Hz in Vascular Hemiplegia.

Recovery of neurological deficits after stroke results from a reorganization of cortical activities, possibly through brain plasticity. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS-MagproR30) produces changes in cortical excitability, generates phenomena of neuroplasticity. Its use to improve function after stroke, particularly of the upper limb, was validated. The investigators propose to evaluate in a prospective pilot against placebo, the benefit of rTMS at low frequency (1Hz) on the unaffected hemisphere in the short and medium term, especially on walking function and spasticity in patients with sequelae of cerebral infarction in the MCA territory with gait disturbance and motor weakness of the upper limb.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • Dr Angelique STEFAN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-80 years of two sexes
  • Cerebral infarction older than 12 months
  • NIH score > 4
  • Patient able to walk with or without technical assistance, Rankin score greater than or equal to 3
  • No changes can interfere with treatment of spasticity in the 3 months preceding the study (benzodiazepines, baclofen, dantrolene, botulinum toxin ...)
  • No history of generalized epilepsy unbalanced
  • Free and informed consent signed by the patient
  • MRI with ancient anatomical sequence confirming the accident sylvian

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke with motor sequelae of cerebral infarction prior to qualifying
  • Alteration of the course prior to stroke
  • Generalized epilepsy unbalanced
  • Arrhythmias untreated
  • Injection of botulinum toxin in the previous 4 months of randomization and 2 months after randomization
  • Severe aphasia or cognitive impairment that interferes with the understanding of the tasks
  • Presence of ferromagnetic material intracranial
  • Pacemaker

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: rTMS active

For each patient, stimulation inactive (sham) and 1 Hz stimulation activates the healthy motor cortex (randomization). Active or sham session: Each session includes a series of 5 sessions of 20 'weekly (daily for 5 d) evaluation and pre-rTMS (T0 within 6 h before the procedure) and 1h post-rTMS (T1), at J8 (T2) and J21 (T3).

6-week interval between two sessions.

Placebo Comparator: rTMS inactive (sham)

For each patient, stimulation inactive (sham) and 1 Hz stimulation activates the healthy motor cortex (randomization). Active or sham session: Each session includes a series of 5 sessions of 20 'weekly (daily for 5 d) evaluation and pre-rTMS (T0 within 6 h before the procedure) and 1h post-rTMS (T1), at J8 (T2) and J21 (T3).

6-week interval between two sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spontaneous walking speed of 10 meters. The evaluation of the primary endpoint is blind to the stimulation
Time Frame: 3 months

Spontaneous walking speed (comfortable) to 10 meters. The gain on the walking speed of 10 meters will be appreciated by an independent evaluator, blinded to randomization.

The evaluation will be made on day 1 pre (T0) and post-stimulation (T1) (for 6 hours before and after 1 h), at D8 (T2) and J21 (T3) for 2 sessions (sham and active) .

3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distance covered in 6 min
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
- Study of the march by AQM (Gait Deviation Index)
Time Frame: 3 months

Measurement parameters spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic walking on day 1 pre-test, J8, J21 of the two phases.

This measurement is performed using 4 cameras and markers installed in the room where runs quantified analysis of the march.

Patients are fitted with reflective markers so that their movements are recorded and then digitized

3 months
- Consequence of lower limb spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale of the quadriceps and triceps surae)
Time Frame: 3 months
Used to describe a subjective rate of increase in resistance or tone perceived by an examiner when a member engages in the mobility sector. Coast of the score 0-4 (0 no strength, no mobility possible, 4). The scale is used to measure the first tone. Its reproducibility is quite low but it is the scale used and accepted. It is brief and feasible (no equipment, but requires training).Will be measured pre and post test J1, J8 and J21 of the two phases.
3 months
Analytical and functional recovery of the lower limb (Fugl-Meyer Scale, the FIM score)
Time Frame: 3 months

The scale sensorimotor Fugl-Meyer: widely used in the literature, gold standard. The evolution motor is well defined. First part to obtain three subscores: MS (33 items, side 0 to 66), MI (17 items sides from 0 to 34), equilibrium (7 items sides from 0 to 14). The score can be used in total or subgroup. It requires 30 to 45 minutes with a trained evaluator. It can easily be used in clinical practice. A change in score <10 may be due to simple measurement error and may not reflect a significant change in motor skills.

Will be measured pre and post test J1, J8 and J21 of the two phases.

3 months
Analytical and functional recovery of upper limb (Fugl-Meyer score and French arm test)
Time Frame: 3 months
The Frenchay Arm Test: This test, rapid (5 min) includes five tasks rated 0 or 1, requiring the use of one or both hands: draw a line, then install a lift cylinder, lift and then rest a glass of water, remove and replace a clothespin and combing. The score ranges from 0 to 5. The FAT is used to evaluate both the proximal motor skills, manual dexterity and bimanual coordination. It is validated in hemiplegic, reproduced over time and between observers, but its ceiling and floor effects are very important. Will be measured pre and post test J1, J8 and J21 of the two phases.
3 months
Patient satisfaction and quality of life on a visual analog scale and the SF 36.
Time Frame: 3 months
Is a generic health scale created to measure health status in the general population. It includes 36 items organized into eight dimensions, physical functioning, physical limitations, pain, social functioning, mental health, emotion, vitality, general health perceptions. It includes two questions to estimate the change of health status on the past four weeks. The test is validated, it is a simple questionnaire and short of 10 minutes (acceptability).It requires no training to administer. It can be done by mail (Feasibility).She will be provided on D8 of the two phases.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Angélique STEFAN, PH, CHU de Nantes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 8, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BRD/10/04-P

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemiplegia

3
Subscribe