Intrathecal Morphine Administration Using Implantable Pump With Continuous or Programmable Flow (PITAC)

March 23, 2020 updated by: Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest

Comparison of Two Types of Intrathecal Morphine Administration by Pump for Analgesia in Cancer Patients With Failure of Conventional Analgesic Therapy.

The aim of this study is to compare intrathecal morphine administration: using a pump with continuous or programmable flow.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cancer is frequently associated with pain. In spite of recent improvements in cancer related pain treatment, incidence of cancerous chronic pain did not decrease. Indeed, 15 to 20% of patients are still suffering from intractable pain despite an optimal symptom management.

Treatment of cancer pain is generally based on the WHO analgesic ladder according to 3 steps. Patients with advanced cancer are often treated at WHO step 3 analgesics, i.e. morphine and its derivatives, at high dosages. But increasing the dosage of opioids also leads to accentuation of their adverse events and the corresponding risks.

At this stage of the disease, in patients with failure of conventional analgesic therapy, intrathecal injection of analgesics can be decided in order to relieve pain. 2 types of pumps allow intrathecal morphine administration : continuous or programmable flow. In this study, we want to compare the quality of analgesia obtained through these 2 flows.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Angers, France, 49933
        • ICO Paul Papin
      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • Institut Bergonie
      • Laon, France, 02001
        • Centre Hospitalier
      • Lille, France, 53020
        • Centre OSCAR LAMBRET
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Hôpital Laënnec
      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • Polyclinique

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > or = 18 years old.
  • Patient with advanced cancer.
  • Patient with severe pain, i.e. a mean daily pain score > or = 5 on an numeric rating scale.
  • Failure of optimal conventional analgesic therapy : either due to intolerable adverse events or to lack of efficacy, i.e. after having tried opioid rotation techniques, different way of administration, use of rapid-acting narcotics to control acute episodes of pain, use of intravenous morphine by PCA pump.
  • Possibility of return home
  • Dated and signed informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal to participate in the study.
  • Ongoing pregnancy.
  • Ongoing systemic infection.
  • Injection site infection.
  • Estimated survival less than 90 days.
  • Allergy or intolerance to morphine.
  • Contraindication to implantation of an intrathecal catheter.
  • Patient treated with a powerful CYP1A2 inhibitor, such as fluvoxamine or enoxacin.
  • Intrathecal chemotherapy planned.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Intrathecal pump with continuous flow
After placement of the implantable pump, continuous flow is scheduled by physician and the patient can't modify it.
Insertion of an implantable pump filled up with the analgesic solution. Connection of the catheter to the intrathecal space. Continuous morphine's flow is scheduled.
Other Names:
  • Isomed Pump 8472
EXPERIMENTAL: Intrathecal pump with programmable flow.
After placement of the implantable pump, programmable flow is scheduled by physician and patient can do himself morphine bolus injections for a better control of acute episodes of pain.
Insertion of an implantable pump filled up with the analgesic solution. Connection of the catheter to the intrathecal space. Programmable morphine's flow is scheduled.
Other Names:
  • Synchromed II pump 8637

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain improvement between 2 groups.
Time Frame: At 3 month
Pain will be assessed every day by patient using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS. VAS scores will be compared between 2 groups(continuous or programmable flow). We want to demonstrate the superiority of intrathecal analgesia obtained through programmable flow compared to continuous flow.
At 3 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain improvement with intrathecal analgesia compared to previous antalgic therapy.
Time Frame: at 3 month
Using Visual Analog Scale's score, we want to demonstrate the superiority of intrathecal analgesia compared to previous treatment (pain is assessed through VAS within 4 days before inclusion).
at 3 month
Adverse Events assessment.
Time Frame: every month

We want to demonstrate a reduction of adverse events related to intrathecal analgesia compared to the previous treatment and to compare the two delivery systems.

Adverse events due to morphine (6 types) will be scored according to 4 levels, then the sum of these scores will constitute an adverse event severity index ranging from 0 to 18. This index will be compared between the 2 arms and will also be compared to baseline values before introduction of intrathecal analgesia.

every month
Patient's performance status improvement.
Time Frame: At 1 month
We want to demonstrate improvement of the patient's performance status during intrathecal analgesia compared to the previous treatment and to compare the two delivery systems.
At 1 month
Incidence and types of complications.
Time Frame: every month.
We want to compare the incidence and type of complications (infectious, morphine-related and co-analgesic treatments-related, due to the intrathecal catheter, to the implantable pump) between the two delivery systems.
every month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Denis Dupoiron, MD, Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 14, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CPP-401
  • 2008-005087-14 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advanced Cancer

Clinical Trials on Implantable pump with continuous flow

3
Subscribe