Prospective Study of the BioVentrix PliCath HF™ System for the Treatment of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (CONFIGURE-HF)

March 10, 2021 updated by: BioVentrix

This Study is a Multi-center, Prospective, Single-armed, Study Designed to Evaluate the Safety and Feasibility of the BioVentrix PliCath HF System for Left Ventricular (LV) Volume and Radius Reduction Through Scar Exclusion in Patients Whose Systolic HF is Due to Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

The purpose of the study is to determine the safety, and feasibility of a device, which enables LV volume and radius reduction through scar exclusion in patients whose systolic HF is due to ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Appropriate subjects will have akinetic or dyskinetic scar located in the antero-septal LV distribution. Use of this device replicates the geometric reconfiguration of the ventricle achieved through surgical Left Ventricular Reconstruction (LVR), but on a beating, unsupported heart, thereby creating the option of avoiding the use of cardiopulmonary bypass pump (CBP).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Congestive heart failure is the "epidemic" of cardiovascular disease (Eugene Braunwald, NEJM 1997), yet there is no cure. The American Heart Association (AHA) reports the nearly five million Americans are afflicted. Approximately 1.5 million admissions in the US are due to heart failure (HF); it is the number one cost-item for Medicare, comprising 6% of its total expenditures.

In view of the limitations of existing therapy, physicians have sought alternative treatments. In this regard, there has been longstanding interest in surgical reconstruction of the failing heart. The underlying premise has been to surgically reduce the size of the ventricular chamber by removing a portion of the ventricular wall to decrease chamber radius. A reduction of chamber radius reduces wall stress for a given pressure so that the remaining muscle is put into a more favorable mechanical state.

The BioVentrix PliCath HF System consists of implantable anchors, the delivery system, and accessories, which are sterile and biocompatible. These devices are used in the reconfiguration of the abnormal cardiac geometry that is causing dysfunction by excluding a portion of the left ventricular chamber.

The procedure is based on the premise that the beneficial effects of Left Ventricular Reconstruction (LVR) via radius and volume reduction, can be realized by excluding a portion of the scarred left ventricle wall circumference. The procedure is similar to a Dor procedure except that it utilizes a series of anchors in place of the Fontan stitch and patch to exclude infarcted tissue and reduce the size of the left ventricle chamber and the scarred left ventricle wall. Because the ventricle is not resected, it is possible to do the procedure without a cardiopulmonary bypass pump.

The validity of this concept has been documented. Geometric confirmation was initially accomplished in a bench model, where radius was decreased by 24% and volume was diminished by 35% after exclusion of an antero-septal wall segment in dilated, explanted porcine hearts.

When using the PliCath System in accomplishing LV reconfiguration, the fundamental technical maneuver is placement of a hollow needle through a predetermined site in the anterior wall scar, across the LV chamber, and through a predetermined site in the scarred interventricular septum. Once achieved, a flexible guidewire is advanced through the needle and into the free right ventricular (RV) chamber. Once the wire is completely through the septum, a dilator enables passage of a 14Fr Introducer to traverse the needle route, allowing introduction of an internal, elongated anchor which can be oriented into appropriate alignment and matched with an external anchor of identical length and alignment. The anchors, which are placed in the RV and on the epicardium as a result of the original needle passage, can be brought toward each other until contact between the two walls is established and they are apposed along their lengths. The action is repeated (i.e., repeated needle sticks and anchor placement), along the long axis of the LV until a linear portion of antero-lateral wall is in contact with a corresponding portion of the septum, excluding the entire intervening wall segment from the circumference of the chamber.

The device is designed to allow removal at any stage of deployment prior to removal of the "Leash" attached to the hinged, internal anchor.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Riga, Latvia
        • Pauls Stradins Hospital
      • Vilnius, Lithuania
        • Santariskiu Klinikus
      • Krakow, Poland
        • Jagiellonian University Hospital
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Bakoulev Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 - 80
  • 15% ≥ LVEF ≤ 45%
  • NYHA FC II-III
  • 60 cc/m² ≥ LVESV/I ≤ 120 cc/m²
  • Acontractile (akinetic and/or dyskinetic) scar located in the antero-septalapical region due to prior infarction as evidenced by an echocardiogram and/or an MRI
  • Maintained standard medical management for at least 90 days, and at stable target (or maximum tolerated) dosages.
  • Willing and competent to complete informed consent
  • Viability of myocardium in regions remote from area of intended scar exclusion as evidenced by an echocardiogram and/or an MRI
  • Agree to required follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Calcified ventricular wall in the akinetic region
  • Thrombus or intra-ventricular mass in left atrium or ventricle Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) device placement within prior 60 days of enrollment
  • Significant diastolic dysfunction, defined as a pseudonormal Doppler filling pattern with E/A ratio > 2
  • Thin walled, paradoxically moving septal scar that would preclude successful support of the anchor pairs as evidenced by an MRI
  • Cardiac valve disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, will require surgery
  • Mitral Regurgitation > 1+
  • Intolerance or unwillingness to take warfarin
  • Functioning pacemaker leads in antero-apical RV which, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with anchor placement.
  • Pulmonary Arterial Pressure > 60 mm Hg
  • Myocardial Infarction within prior 90 days enrollment
  • Previous CVA or TIA which resulted, in the opinion of the investigator, in a significant residual neurological deficit
  • Co-morbid disease process with life expectancy of less than one year
  • Patients with lung, kidney and/or liver transplant
  • Chronic renal failure with a serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study
  • Enrolled in any concurrent study other than observational

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of overall rate of serious adverse device effects
Time Frame: 12 Months Post-operative
The primary safety endpoint is an assessment of the overall rate of serious adverse device effects through 12 months as adjudicated by the Data Monitoring Committee.
12 Months Post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of overall rate of serious adverse events
Time Frame: 12 Months post-operative
The secondary safety endpoint is an assessment of the overall rate of serious adverse events through 12 months as adjudicated by the Data Monitoring Committee.
12 Months post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 2, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20032-P

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on PliCath HF System

3
Subscribe