Quality Assessment Creatinines in Plasma and Urine

April 10, 2012 updated by: Nanne Kleefstra, Medical Research Foundation, The Netherlands

Quality Assessment of Creatinines in Plasma and Urine

In clinical practice the 24-hour creatinine clearance is often used to obtain an impression of renal function. However, the glomerular filtration rate is considered to be the best indicator of renal function. For practical and financial purposes, GFR is often estimated by means of serum creatinine based equations. These equations are also used in internation guidelines to define and classify chronic kidney disease. Therefore, accurate creatinine measurements are important to make reliable estimates of renal function. However, previous research has revealed a large variability in creatinine measurements using different measuring methods. In this study the investigators aim to establish the degree of variability in different methods to measure creatinine in a heterogenous group of Caucasian people with and without renal function loss and the influence of this variability on renal function estimating equations and the 24-hour creatinine clearance.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Apart from the 24-hour creatinine clearance, also formulas to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are increasingly used to get an impression from renal function in recent years. Based on these renal function measurements, clinical decisions are made as well as drug dose adjustments. The use of reliable serum creatinine measurements is therefore important to get accurate renal function estimates. However, serum creatinine is one of the most variable routine laboratory tests.

The importance of calibration to a traceable reference measurement of serum creatinine has been stressed. However, this standardization does not correct for analytical non-specificity problems, which occurs in certain techniques to measure creatinine, leading to under- or overestimation of the true creatinine concentration.

The aim of this cross-sectional observational study is to examine the degree of variability between diverse methods to measure creatinine in plasma and urine in a heterogenous group of Caucasian people with and without renal function loss and the influence hereof on the 24-hour creatinine clearance and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation and the consequences for chronic kidney disease staging.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

181

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients presenting at the laboratory facility for a 24-hour creatinine clearance and patients in the dialysis population of the Isala Clinics who came for their periodical KT/V control, were informed about the study and asked to participate. Moreover, 20 'healthy' volunteers (including the investigators of this study and staff working at the clinical chemistry department of the Isala clinics) participated in this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients >18 years presenting at the laboratory facility for a 24-hour creatinine clearance, or
  • Persons >18 years, undergoing a renal replacing therapy by means of hemo-/peritoneal dialysis that had a KT/V appointment between May 2010 - January 2011

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients <18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients coming for creatinine clearance
For this single group study, all patients presenting at the laboratory facility for a 24-hour creatinine clearance and patients in the dialysis population of the Isala Clinics who came for their periodical KT/V control, were informed about the study and asked to participate. Moreover, 20 'healthy' volunteers (including the investigators of this study and staff working at the clinical chemistry department of the Isala clinics) participated in this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To investigate the bias and precision between routine laboratory techniques to measure creatinine in plasma, urine and dialysate when compared to the gold standard to measure creatinine.
Time Frame: 6 months (plasma, urine and dialysate samples are collected only once during the running of the study)
Creatinine concentrations of plasma, urine and/or dialysate samples will be measured using different techniques applied in daily clinical practice (jaffe, enzymatic and HPLC). For each participant creatinine will also be measured using the gold standard measure LC-MS. LCMS values will be used as reference method against which routine methods will be compared by means of absolute bias and precision per method group. Absolute bias is the mean difference between SCr values measured by individual laboratories and SCr target values; precision is defined as the SD of the absolute bias.
6 months (plasma, urine and dialysate samples are collected only once during the running of the study)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: I Drion, MD, Diabetes Centre, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
  • Study Director: Henk JG Bilo, Prof, Diabetes Centre, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2012

Last Verified

April 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Disease

3
Subscribe