Efficacy and Safety of CO2 vs Room Air Insufflation During ESD for Gastric Tumor

February 8, 2015 updated by: Ju Seung Kim, MD, Gachon University Gil Medical Center

A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of CO2 vs Room Air Insufflation During ESD for Gastric Tumor

Insufflation is essential procedure to observe the lumen of gastrointestinal tract in gastroscopy or colonoscopy Currently, most of hospital in Korea are using room air for insufflation According to recent clinical studies have shown that carbon dioxide have better safe and reduce stomachache than room air when endoscopy and endoscopic procedure is performed.

However, there was still no research data or study in Korea. In this study, the investigators will try to make comparison between Carbon dioxide and room air insufflation for endoscopic submucosal dissection for Gastric Tumor and investigate the efficacy and safety

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 405-760
        • Gachon University Gil Medical Center Department of Gastroentorology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have gastroscopy and colonoscopy or ESD for gastric tumor under sedation in department of gastroenterology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age : < 19 years old
  • Underlying disease : COPD requiring O2
  • Known CO2 retention
  • Opiate abuse for chronic pain
  • Nonreader or short in understanding
  • Pregnancy
  • Any medical instabilities expected to not be in safe

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CO2 sufflation group
CO2 insufflation group : CO2 will be insufflated via the endoscope during procedure as needed, Room air insufflation group : Room air will be insufflated via the endoscope during procedure as needed
Experimental: Room air sufflation group
CO2 insufflation group : CO2 will be insufflated via the endoscope during procedure as needed, Room air insufflation group : Room air will be insufflated via the endoscope during procedure as needed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abdominal pain related to each insufflation
Time Frame: 1 day
Patients will be received questionnaire (100mm visual analogue scale, VAS) and record their score in 0, 1, 3, 6, 24 hours after endoscopic procedure.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: 1 day
The investigators will check the side effect during and after pocedure. If any side effect occur, the investigators will stop the procedure and act right away.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Tumor

3
Subscribe