Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab With or Without Laser in Comparison to Laser in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRIGHTER)

September 21, 2016 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A 24-month, Phase IIIb, Open-label, Randomized, Active Controlled, 3-arm, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of an Individualized, Stabilization-criteria-driven PRN Dosing Regimen With 0.5-mg Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections Applied as Monotherapy or With Adjunctive Laser Photocoagulation in Comparison to Laser Photocoagulation in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

This study will generate comparative data for 0.5-mg ranibizumab using PRN dosing administered with or without adjunctive laser treatment versus laser photocoagulation (the current standard of care) up to Month 6 in patients with visual impairment due to ME secondary to BRVO. Additionally the results of this study will provide long-term (24-month) safety and efficacy data for ranibizumab, administered with or without adjunctive laser treatment in this indication.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

455

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia, 2150
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3002
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Western Australia
      • Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2H0C8
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8V 4X3
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 2Y9
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4G5
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Quebec
      • Boisbriand, Quebec, Canada, J7H 1S6
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 2M4
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Olomouc, Czech Republic, 775 20
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Praha 10, Czech Republic, 100 34
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Glostrup, Denmark, DK-2600
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dijon, France, 21033
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lyon, France, 69003
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nice, France, 06000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Paris, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Paris Cedex 19, France, 75940
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Paris cedex 10, France, 75010
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Patras, Greece, 26504
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, GR 54636
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • GR
      • Athens, GR, Greece, 124 62
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Heraklion Crete, GR, Greece, 711 10
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Larissa, GR, Greece, 411 10
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Thessaloniki, GR, Greece, 546 29
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, H-1083
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1133
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Debrecen, Hungary, 4032
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dublin, Ireland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dublin 7, Ireland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bari, Italy, 70124
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Udine, Italy, 33100
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • BO
      • Bologna, BO, Italy, 40138
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • FI
      • Firenze, FI, Italy, 50134
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • MI
      • Milano, MI, Italy, 20132
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Milano, MI, Italy, 20100
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • RM
      • Roma, RM, Italy, 00144
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • TO
      • Torino, TO, Italy, 10122
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leiden 2333 ZA, Netherlands, 2333
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3011 BH
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tilburg, Netherlands, 5022 GC
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bielsko-Biala, Poland, 43-300
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Gdansk, Poland, 80-809
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kraków, Poland, 31-501
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lublin, Poland, 20-079
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Warszawa, Poland, 02-005
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 50-556
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-354
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Coimbra, Portugal, 3030-163
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lisboa, Portugal, 1349-019
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lisboa, Portugal, 1050-085
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Porto, Portugal, 4099-001
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Porto, Portugal, 4200-319
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, 975 17
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bratislava, Slovakia, 826 06
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bratislava, Slovakia, 851 07
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Slovak Republic
      • Zilina, Slovak Republic, Slovakia, 010 01
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Castilla y Leon
      • Valladolid, Castilla y Leon, Spain, 47011
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Cataluña
      • Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain, 08022
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • L´Hospitalet de Llobregat, Cataluña, Spain, 08907
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Comunidad Valenciana
      • Alicante, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 03016
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 46014
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 46015
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Galicia
      • Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain, 15706
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Pais Vasco
      • Bilbao, Pais Vasco, Spain, 48006
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Örebro, Sweden, 701 85
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3012
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lausanne, Switzerland, 1007
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Olten, Switzerland, 4600
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Zuerich, Switzerland, 8063
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Belfast, United Kingdom, BT12 6BA
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B9 5SS
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bristol, United Kingdom, BS1 2LX
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • London, United Kingdom, EC1V 2PD
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • London, United Kingdom, NW1 5QH
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE1 4LP
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Plymouth, United Kingdom, PL4 6PL
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Southampton, United Kingdom, SO16 6YD
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Surrey
      • Frimley, Surrey, United Kingdom, GU16 7UJ
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any study assessment is performed
  • Diagnosis of visual impairment exclusively due to ME secondary to BRVO
  • BCVA score at Screening and Baseline between 73 and 19 letters (ETDRS)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  • Stroke or myocardial infarction less than 3 months before Screening
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as systolic value of >160 mm Hg or diastolic value of >100 mm Hg at Screening or Baseline.
  • Any active periocular or ocular infection or inflammation at Screening or Baseline in either eye
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma at Screening or Baseline or diagnosed within 6 months before Baseline in either eye
  • Neovascularization of the iris or neovascular glaucoma in the study eye
  • Use of any systemic antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs within 6 months before Baseline
  • Panretinal laser photocoagulation within 3 months before Baseline or anticipated or scheduled within the next 3 months following Baseline in the study eye
  • Focal or grid laser photocoagulation within 4 months before Baseline in the study eye
  • Use of intra- or periocular corticosteroids (including sub-Tenon) within 3 months before Screening in the study eye
  • Any use of intraocular corticosteroid implants (eg, dexamethasone [Ozurdex®], fluocinolone acetonide [Iluvien®]) in the study eye

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1-ranibizumab monotherapy
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
Experimental: 2-ranibizumab with laser
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + laser
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
laser photocoagulation
Active Comparator: 3-laser monotherapy
Laser monotherapy with Ranibizumab 0.5 mg from Month 6
laser photocoagulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Visual Acuity: BCVA Change at Month 6 Compared to Baseline in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Months

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)

-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 6 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and assessed by an ANOVA model.

Baseline, 6 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Mean Average Change in Visual Acuity From Month 1 Through Month 24 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. (A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement): Mean Average Change: for each patient, first average change is calculated as the average of the changes from baseline to Month 1 over Month 24. Then, mean average change is calculated as the average of average changes across all patients.
Baseline, 24 Months
Number of Ranibizumab Treatments From Day 1 to Month 23 by Treatment Group
Time Frame: Day 1 through Month 23
Number of injections provided to the patients during the 23 month period and conducted within FAS with LOCF and observed data.
Day 1 through Month 23
Mean Average Change in Visual Acuity (BCVA Letters) From Month 1 Through Month 6
Time Frame: From Baseline through Month 6
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters.(A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement): Mean Average Change: for each patient, first average change is calculated as the average of the changes from baseline to Month 1 over Month 6. Then, mean average change is calculated as the average of average changes across all patients.
From Baseline through Month 6
The Mean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline at Month 12 and Month 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 12 and Month 24 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and were assessed by an ANOVA model.
Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24
The Percent of Patients With a Visual Acuity Gain of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 24, by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 24
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the number of participants who had improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 letters of visual acuity at Month 6 & Month 24 as compared with baseline, was assessed by an ANOVA model. Endpoints related to the proportion of patients with BCVA letter gain or loss from Baseline was analyzed via stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with stratification based on baseline BCVA (baseline BCVA less than or equal to 39, 40 to 59, greater than or equal to 60 letters, treatment groups).
Baseline, Month 6 and Month 24
Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs Baseline or Achieving Greater Than or Equal to 73 Letters at Month 6 in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Month 6
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and Month 6 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 6 indicates a positive outcome.
Month 6
Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs Baseline or Achieved Greater Than or Equal to 73 Letters at Month 24 in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Month 24
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and Month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 24 indicates a positive outcome.
Month 24
The Mean Change in Central Reading Center-assessed Central Subfield Thickness From Month 12 and Month 24 vs. Baseline by Treatment Arm
Time Frame: Month 12 and Month 24
Retinal thickness was measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). The images were reviewed by a central reading center to ensure a standardized evaluation. Stratification was done based on categories of baseline best corrected visual acuity & analysis was based on analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Month 12 and Month 24
The Mean Change in Patient Reported Outcomes in NEI-VFQ-25 Score (Composite Score and Subscales) at Month 6 and Month 24 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Months 6 and 24
The survey consists of 25 items representing 11 vision related constructs (general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision) plus a single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. In this format scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score.
Months 6 and 24
BCVA (Letters) Mean Average Change From First Ranibizumab Treatment to Month 24 in the Study Eye for Patients Randomized to the Laser Monotherapy Arm
Time Frame: Month 24

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)

-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 24 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and assessed by an ANOVA model.

Month 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

May 16, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 10, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Clinical Trials on Ranibizumab

3
Subscribe