Visual Cues for Gait Training Post-stroke (VCTpilot)

December 2, 2014 updated by: Dr Kristen Hollands, University of Salford

Visual Cue Training to Improve Walking and Turning After Stroke: a Pilot Study

Given that visual information comprises one of the most important and salient sources of information used during walking, that visual cues have been shown to be more effective than auditory cues in triggering gait adjustments and that stroke survivors have been reported to become more dependent on visual cues, the investigators hypothesize that visual cues would be more effective in triggering gait recovery and adaptability following stroke than interventions not including visual cues.

The investigators will integrate visual cues with walking and turning practice, and contrast this intervention to routine overground walking practice. Stroke participants recruited from NHS stroke rehabilitation clinics in the West Midlands, will be randomized to one of three gait rehabilitation groups. Each group will receive the same frequency and duration of treatment delivered by qualified physiotherapists. Overground visual cue training (OVCT) and usual care (UC) groups will be treated in participating NHS sites. Treadmill training with visual cues (TVCT) will take place at the University of Birmingham.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The gait of many stroke patients remains impoverished and characterized by impairments including asymmetries in propulsive forces between the paretic and non-paretic limbs, step lengths, widths and stance and swing phase durations. Currently there is insufficient evidence that current rehabilitation strategies improve walking in people who are more than 6 months post-stroke.

The purpose of the trial is to determine the necessary information on which to base a future definitive trial examining the effectiveness of visual cues for gait training following stroke in contrast to conventional over-ground walking practice.

The study will determine the numbers of patients willing to be recruited into both control and VCT groups; the willingness of physiotherapists at each collaborating site to enroll patients to usual care OVCT and TVCT groups.

It will determine the numbers of patients who do not complete the allocated treatment, thus dropping out of the study, and the reasons for dropping out.

The knowledge gathered about recruitment, outcomes and drop-out rates will determine sample size for a subsequent definitive trial.

The study will also measure completeness of outcome data, i.e. percentage of patients with no missing values in outcome assessments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B18 7QH
        • Sandwell and West Birmingham Hopsitals NHS Trust
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B9 5SS
        • Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, CV2 2DX
        • South Warickshire NHS Foundation Trust
    • West Midlands
      • Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom, B13 8JL
        • Birmingham Community Health Care NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of stroke
  • Able to walk 10 metres with or without assistance
  • Residual paresis in the lower limb (Fugl-Meyer Lower Limb score less than 34)
  • Informed written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gait speed more than 0.8 m/s
  • Patients with a premorbid (retrospective) modified Rankin Scale score of greater than 3
  • Gait deficits attributable to non-stroke pathology
  • Visual impairments preventing use of visual cue training (as assessed by Apple Cancellation test
  • Concurrent progressive neurologic disorder, acute coronary syndrome, severe heart failure, confirmed or suspected lower-limb fracture preventing mobilization, and those requiring palliative care
  • Inability to follow a three step command (as assessed by Modified mini-mental status exam).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual Care
A task specific-based intervention that does not include use of visual cues to influence quality or adaptability of gait.
Walking rehabilitation for 1 hour, 2 times per week and 8 weeks duration. Usual care intervention that does not include use of visual cues to influence quality or adaptability of gait.
Other Names:
  • Standard care
  • Standard physiotherapy
Experimental: Overground visual cue training
Overground visual cue training will involve stepping to targets which are positioned to improve gait symmetry and speed. Training will include turning practice and the avoidance of obstacles for adaptability during straight walking.
Walking rehabilitation for 1 hour, 2 times per week and 8 weeks duration. Overground visual cue training will involve stepping to targets, which are positioned to improve walking pattern according to needs identified in baseline assessment. Treatment will progress from practice of improved stepping pattern (symmetry of stepping) and speed to practice of adjusting footfalls by avoiding targets randomly, as one might need to be able to do to avoid an obstacle or an uneven surface. Training will also involve turning practice.Overground visual cue training will be delivered by National Health Service therapists in participating National Health Service sites.
Other Names:
  • Visual cue gait training
Experimental: Treadmill visual cue training
Treadmill training with visual cues will be delivered using a force-instrumented treadmill (CMill, Forcelink, NL). Walking training will involve stepping to targets which are positioned to improve gait symmetry and speed. Training will include turning practice and the avoidance of obstacles for adaptability during straight walking.
Walking rehabilitation for 1 hour, 2 times per week and 8 weeks duration. Treadmill training with visual cues will be delivered using a force-instrumented treadmill (CMill, Forcelink, NL). The Treadmill visual cue training will involve participants stepping to targets shone onto a treadmill. Treatment will progress from practice of improved stepping pattern (symmetry of stepping) and speed to practice of adjusting footfalls by avoiding targets randomly, as one might need to be able to do to avoid an obstacle or an uneven surface. Training will also involve turning practice. Treadmill visual cue training will be delivered by qualified physiotherapists at the University of Birmingham.
Other Names:
  • CMill, Forcelink, NL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant enrollment, recruitment and retention.
Time Frame: Ongoing for18 months after start of recruitment.

Determine:

  1. The numbers of patients willing to be recruited into both control and VCT groups.
  2. The willingness of physiotherapists at each collaborating site to enrol patients to both control and VCT groups.
  3. The numbers of patients who do not complete the allocated treatment, thus dropping out of the study, and determine the reasons for dropping out.
  4. Measure completeness of outcome data, i.e. percentage of patients with no missing values in outcome assessments.
Ongoing for18 months after start of recruitment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
180 degree turn
Time Frame: Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Time taken (s) and number of steps (#) to complete a 180 degree turn
Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Gait adaptability
Time Frame: Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
The number of times participants fail to hit stepping targets when these are presented unpredictably in timing and location will be used to indicate the ability to adapt the straight gait pattern according to environmental demands.
Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Timed up and Go (TUG) test (7m)
Time Frame: Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
The subject begins by sitting up strait in a chair with their hands on their thighs and their backs touching the back of the chair. After they are given the go signal, they rise from the chair, walk at their normal speed, turn around right after passing the tape at the end of the pathway, return back to the chair, turn around and sit down.
Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Fugl-Meyer Lower Limb Motor Assessment
Time Frame: Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Items are rated on a three point scale (0= cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, 2 = performs fully) and standardised protocols for administration will be followed
Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Falls Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
This will assess changes in confidence to walk without falling which may be expected as a result of practice of adaptable walking
Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
SF-12
Time Frame: Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
This is a short-form health survey with only 12 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, including physical functioning, and social, emotional, mental and general health and has been included to measure effects on broader quality of life
Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Functional ambulation category
Time Frame: Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Gait speed
Time Frame: Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months
Proportion of participants achieving a gait speed of 0.4 m/s and 0.8 m/s. Gait speed will be measured during a 10 metre walk.
Assessments take place at baseline, after completion of an 8 week training program and follow up at 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristen Hollands, PhD, University of Salford

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

May 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Usual care

3
Subscribe