Trunk Muscle Training and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to Improve Function in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain

September 20, 2016 updated by: Gregory Evan Hicks, University of Delaware
Low back pain (LBP) is the most frequently reported musculoskeletal problem and third most frequently reported symptom of any kind in people over the age of 75. In fact, 17.3% of all visits to physicians for LBP involve individuals over 65. In older adults, LBP has been associated with a host of negative consequences, including decreased physical function, increased fall risk, increased mood disturbance and increased health care utilization. Surprisingly, little research has focused on LBP in people over 65. But, recent evidence demonstrates that LBP is associated with increased intramuscular fat infiltration in the abdominal and paraspinal muscles and that this altered muscle composition increases the risk of mobility-related functional decline in older adults. While trunk muscle training (TMT) has been used in younger LBP groups, it is unproven in elders and, alone may not be sufficient to substantially improve function and symptoms, given the compromised state of ages muscle. TMT augmented with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) known to improve strength and function beyond the capacity of volitional exercise alone, may provide greater improvements. Treatment of chronic LBP in older adults using an exercise intervention has been hypothesized as a way to prevent functional decline and frailty progression; however this hypothesis has yet to be experimentally confirmed. In this exploratory study, the investigators will test the hypothesis that TMT plus NMES will result in reduced disability and pain severity compared to usual care in elders with chronic LBP.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: 64 participants > age 65 will be recruited to participate. Participants will be included if they meet the following criteria:

- Low Back Pain for at least 3 months with pain of at least moderate intensity every day or almost every day that requires activity modification. This criterion is necessary to guarantee a subject population that has chronic pain that is not controlled with conventional therapy. At least moderate pain intensity (> 3 on a scale of 0-10) will be required to ensure our ability to detect treatment effects, and because pain of moderate intensity has been shown to be significant in the pain literature.11 The Pain thermometer has been shown to be reliable in older adults12, 13, will be used to screen pain intensity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion Criteria: Subjects will be excluded from the study if any of the following exist:

    • Prominent component of radicular pain: CLBP with distal radiation below the knee
    • Known spinal pathology other than osteoarthritis: (e.g., a history of back surgery or recent trauma, spinal stenosis, vertebral compression fractures, ankylosing spondylitis, carcinoma metastatic to the spine) In these other cases, LBP may be of non-mechanical origin.
    • Non-ambulatory, or severely impaired mobility (i.e., require the use of a walker): Since measurement of physical performance in the proposed study includes gait velocity and standing balance, conditions other than LBP that could negatively impact these measures may confound our study results.
    • Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination score of < 24 will exclude subjects because of the uncertain reliability of their answers to the self-reported outcome measures.
    • Severe visual or hearing impairment: Since this study will involve questionnaires and telephone evaluations, severe visual and/or hearing impairments may interfere with data collection.
    • Red flags indicative of a serious disorder underlying the LBP: Red flags that would require specialized medical attention include fever, significant unintentional weight loss, a sudden recent change in the character or intensity of pain, trauma that preceded the onset of pain, or signs and symptoms of caudae equinae. These subjects will be promptly referred to their primary practitioners.
    • Significant pain in parts of the body other than the back or acute LBP: Since we will be specifically evaluating chronic LBP, we do not want to confound the outcome data with pain from other areas or with acute pain. Thus only subjects with LBP severity that is greater than pain severity elsewhere in the body will be included.
    • Acute or terminal illness: To insure weekly participation and a six month follow-up, subjects with an acute or terminal illness will be excluded from the study.
    • Presence of a pacemaker: Since electrical stimulation will be used in this study and the effects of that stimulation on pacemakers is unknown, we will be cautious and exclude subjects with this device.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Trunk Muscle Training+NMES
Progressive exercise program for the stabilizing muscles of the trunk, as well as neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the lumbar paraspinals
Progressive exercise program for the stabilizing muscles of the trunk, as well as neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the lumbar paraspinals
Active Comparator: Passive control intervention
Passive physical therapy interventions, including moist heat, ultrasound, massage and flexibility exercises
Passive physical therapy approach to low back pain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed Up and Go
Time Frame: 6 months
timed performance test
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Gait speed
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Global Rating of Functional Improvement
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gregory E Hicks, PT, PhD, University of Delaware

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 3, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 160167

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Trunk Muscle Training+NMES

3
Subscribe