Clinical Trial of Endovenous 940 and 1470 Laser Ablation for Treating Great Saphenous Veins (COLA)

February 10, 2015 updated by: Wendy Malskat, Erasmus Medical Center

Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovenous 940 nm Laser Ablation Versus Endovenous 1470 nm Laser Ablation for Treatment of Great Saphenous Veins

A clinical randomized controlled trial, comparing 2 endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) techniques in patients with insufficiency of the great saphenous vein (GSV). There are multiple EVLA devices available, with different wavelengths. In the Netherlands, 940 nm Diode and 1470 nm Nd:Yag laser are the most frequently used devices. Both devices also proven to be equally effective in occluding the GSV. However, little is known about differences in patient-related outcomes. Therefore, the primary outcomes of this comparative clinical trial of 940 nm and 1470 nm EVLA, are pain scores, patient satisfaction and scores of health related and varicose-specific questionnaires. The secondary outcomes are complications and effectiveness of the treatment. It is thought that possibly the 1470 nm ELVA will give lower pain scores and higher patient satisfaction than 940 nm EVLA. No differences are expected in complication rate and effectiveness between the two treatments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

* Study type: Interventional. Randomized comparative clinical trial..

  • Outcome measures:

    • Primary study outcomes: Patient reported outcomes: 1. Pain score and use of painkillers, assessed with a numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain. 2. Treatment satisfaction, assessed with a NRS of satisfaction. 3. Health related quality of life, assessed with Dutch translated Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and EQ-5D questionnaire.
    • Secondary study outcomes: 1. Number of patients with adverse events. Major complications: deep and superficial venous thrombosis (embolic events), nerve injury, skin burns, and (sub)cutaneous infections. Minor complications: ecchymosis and hyperpigmentation. 2. Obliteration of varicose vein and/or absence of reflux (> 0.5 sec. of retrograde flow) along the treated segment of the GSV. This is measured using US examination.
  • Outcome measures time frame:

Follow-up of one year, with outcome measures at baseline, 1 week, 3 months and 1 year post treatment.

* Focus of the study: Varicose great saphenous veins (GSV)

  • Intervention information:

    • Intervention name: endovenous laser ablation (EVLA)
    • Intervention type: 1. EVLA with 940 nm Diode laser 2. EVLA with 1470 nm Nd:Yag laser
    • Arm information: both interventions are active comparators.
  • Locations:

Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

142

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 CA
        • Erasmus Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years old
  • Insufficiency of the GSV measured with ultrasound imaging, reflux > 0.5 sec, and diameter of vein > 0.5 cm
  • Symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency, including complaints related to varicose veins (≥ C2)
  • No prior treatment of the insufficient GSV
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute deep or superficial vein thrombosis
  • Agenesis of deep vein system
  • Vascular malformation or syndrome
  • Post-thrombotic syndrome, occlusive type
  • Pregnancy
  • Immobility
  • Allergy to lidocaine
  • Arterial insufficiency
  • Diameter of GSV ≤ 0.5 mm at puncture site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: EVLA 940 nm
EVLA with 940 nm Diode laser EVLA with 1470 nm Nd:Yag laser With both devices, obliteration of the varicose vein is obtained by heating the vein, using emission of laser light.
Active Comparator: EVLA 1470 nm
EVLA with 940 nm Diode laser EVLA with 1470 nm Nd:Yag laser With both devices, obliteration of the varicose vein is obtained by heating the vein, using emission of laser light.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score and use of painkillers
Time Frame: 1 week post treatment
A questionnaire including a numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain is filled in by the patient.
1 week post treatment
Treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 week post treatment
A NRS of satisfaction is filled in by the patient.
1 week post treatment
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: 0 and 12 weeks post treatment
Dutch Translated Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and EQ-5D questionnaire are filled in by the patient.
0 and 12 weeks post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with adverse events
Time Frame: The adverse events will be assessed at 1 and 12 weeks post treatment.
Minor complications: ecchymoses and hyperpigmentation. Major complications: deep and superficial venous thrombosis (embolic events), nerve injury, skin burns, and (sub)cutaneous infections.
The adverse events will be assessed at 1 and 12 weeks post treatment.
Occlusion of the treated GSV (effectiveness)
Time Frame: The rates will be compared between 940 nm and 1470 nm endovenous laser at time 1, 12 and 52 weeks post treatment.
Obliteration of varicose vein and/or absence of reflux (>0.5 sec. of retrograde flow) along the treated segment of the GSV. This is measured using US examination.
The rates will be compared between 940 nm and 1470 nm endovenous laser at time 1, 12 and 52 weeks post treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 11, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL38160.078.11

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Varicose Veins

Clinical Trials on Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA)

3
Subscribe