Protective Effects of Long-term Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning For Carotid Artery Stenting

October 13, 2015 updated by: Ji Xunming
Remote limb ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has neuro-protective and anti-inflammatory effects on ischemia- reperfusion injury. As the extent of its effect is unknown, the investigators will use clinical outcome, serum biochemical markers and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine whether RIPC has neuro-protective and anti-inflammatory effects on patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Brain ischemia and injury contributed to perioperative morbidity and mortality in Carotid Artery Stenting. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), brief periods of ischemia followed by reperfusion, can provide systemic protection for prolonged ischemia. Our previous study found no significant protection to the patients who received once RIPC before Carotid Artery Stenting. In order to investigate whether long-term RIPC before Carotid Artery Stenting can protect these patients from the perioperative and long-term complications, a prospective randomized controlled trial will be performed in the current study.

DESIGNING: About 189 patients who are eligible for carotid artery stenting will be randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio to RIPC group, sham RIPC group and conventional Carotid Artery Stenting group (control). Remote limb ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is consisted of five 5-min cycles of bilateral arm ischemia/reperfusion, it is induced by an automated cuff-inflator placed on bilateral arm and inflated to 200 mmHg for 5-min followed by deflating the cuff for 5-min, patients in the RIPC group will do it twice a day for at least two weeks before carotid artery stenting. Patients in the sham RIPC group receive sham RIPC treatment, which is consisted of five 5-min cycles of bilateral arm ischemia/reperfusion, induced by an automated cuff-inflator placed on bilateral arm and inflated to 60 mmHg for 5-min followed by deflating the cuff for 5-min, they will do it twice a day for at least two weeks before carotid artery stenting. Patients in the control group receive conventional carotid artery stenting without RIPC or sham RIPC treatment. Cerebral injury is assessed by serum S-100B and Neuron specific enolase (NSE), systematic inflammation is assessed by serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). Post-treatment infarctions, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, are detected by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and clinical outcomes are determined by cerebrovascular events, cardiac events or death.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

189

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100053
        • Baojun Hou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. In symptomatic patients the degree of stenosis should more than 60% (Based on NASCET Criteria), in asymptomatic patients the degree of stenosis should more than 70% (Based on NASCET Criteria);
  2. Tolerance to any of the study medications, including clopidogrel, aspirin and statins;
  3. Can cooperate with and complete brain MRI examination;
  4. Has a negative pregnancy test within 7 days before randomization and no childbearing potential;
  5. Vascular ultrasound excluded intravascular thrombosis and unstable plaques in blood vessels of the bilateral upper limbs;
  6. No hemorrhagic tendency;
  7. Stable vital sign, normal renal and hepatic functions;
  8. Informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Evolving stroke;
  2. Prior major ipsilateral stroke, if likely to confound study endpoints;
  3. Severe dementia;
  4. Hemorrhagic conversion of an ischemic stroke within the past 60 days;
  5. Chronic atrial fibrillation;
  6. Myocardial infarction within previous 30 days;
  7. Inability to understand and cooperate with study procedures or provide informed consent;
  8. Participating in other device or drug trial that has not completed the required protocol follow-up period;
  9. Any conditions that hampers proper angiographic assessment or makes percutaneous arterial access unsafe;
  10. High risk candidates defined as the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST);
  11. Any vascular, extremity soft tissue or orthopedic injury that may contraindicate bilateral arm ischemic preconditioning (e.g. superficial wounds and fractures of the arm);
  12. Blood pressure cannot be controlled lower than 200 mmHg by medications;
  13. Peripheral blood vessel disease (especially subclavian arterial and upper limb artery stenosis or occlusion).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: RIPC group

Treatment:Patients in this group received standard medical therapy and remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) treatment.

Device:RIPC consisted of five 5-min cycles of bilateral arm ischemia/reperfusion, which is induced by an automated cuff-inflator placed on bilateral arm and inflated to 200 mmHg for 5-min followed by deflating the cuff for 5-min,each patient in the RIPC group do it twice a day for at least two weeks before carotid artery stenting.

Procedure: Carotid Artery Stenting

Remote ischemic preconditioning consisted of five 5-min cycles of bilateral arm ischemia/reperfusion, which is induced by an automated cuff-inflator placed on bilateral arm and inflated to 200 mmHg for 5-min followed by deflating the cuff for 5-min.
Other Names:
  • RIPC
Carotid Artery Stenting is an invasive therapy of carotid artery stenosis.
Other Names:
  • CAS
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control group
Treatment:Patients in this group received standard medical therapy alone. Procedure: Carotid Artery Stenting
Carotid Artery Stenting is an invasive therapy of carotid artery stenosis.
Other Names:
  • CAS
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham RIPC group

Treatment:Patients in this group received standard medical therapy and sham remote ischemic preconditioning treatment.

Device:Sham RIPC consisted of five 5-min cycles of bilateral arm ischemia/reperfusion, which is induced by an automated cuff-inflator placed on bilateral arm and inflated to 60 mmHg for 5-min followed by deflating the cuff for 5-min, each patient in RIPC group do it twice a day for at least two weeks before carotid artery stenting.

Procedure: Carotid Artery Stenting

Carotid Artery Stenting is an invasive therapy of carotid artery stenosis.
Other Names:
  • CAS
Sham remote ischemic preconditioning consisted of five 5-min cycles of bilateral arm ischemia/reperfusion, which is induced by an automated cuff-inflator placed on bilateral arm and inflated to 60 mmHg for 5-min followed by deflating the cuff for 5-min.
Other Names:
  • Sham RIPC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients With Cerebrovascular Events, Cardiovascular Events or Death.
Time Frame: Within six months after carotid artery stenting
Cerebrovascular events included ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebral hemorrhage and hyperperfusion syndrome. Cardiovascular events included angina and myocardial infarction.Death included any reason caused death.
Within six months after carotid artery stenting
Participants Who Got New Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) Lesions on Post-treatment Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans.
Time Frame: Within 48 hours after carotid artery stenting.
Within 48 hours after carotid artery stenting.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum High-sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP).
Time Frame: Baseline, on admission, and 1 and 24 hours after carotid artery stenting.
Baseline, on admission, and 1 and 24 hours after carotid artery stenting.
Number of Patients With Any Side Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) Treatment.
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months after treatment.
The side effects referred to any side effects of RIPC or sham RIPC treatment, not including the sides effect of medications and CAS.
From baseline to 6 months after treatment.
Serum Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE) Levels.
Time Frame: Baseline, on admission, and 1 and 24 hours after carotid artery stenting.
Baseline, on admission, and 1 and 24 hours after carotid artery stenting.
Serum S-100B Levels.
Time Frame: Baseline, on admission, and 1 and 24 hours after carotid artery stenting.
Baseline, on admission, and 1 and 24 hours after carotid artery stenting.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xunming Ji M.D., Ph.D., Capital Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 1, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 11, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2015

Last Verified

October 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carotid Artery Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Remote ischemic preconditioning

3
Subscribe