Wound Dressings For Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites in Patients Undergoing Surgery

A Comparative Study of Dressings for Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites.

This study is to determine what dressing would work best to heal and keep from hurting, the split-thickness skin graft donor site which will be done as part of the patient's surgical procedure. Currently there is a dressing that is transparent and it is placed on the wound after surgery and wrapped with gauze and an elastic bandage. Two days after the surgery the gauze and elastic bandages are removed and the area is left with the transparent dressing. Sometimes the dressing needs to be changed because it leaks. On the fifth day this dressing is removed and the wound is left open to air. The dressing researchers are studying is a dressing that has been used for different types of wounds, as well as this type of wound. It is applied in the same manner; however, it is left in place until it falls off independently, usually around post-operative (post-op) day 10.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Which dressing type and technique is most effective in minimizing pain and inflammation and promoting epithelialization in patients who have had surgery which requires the use of an anterior thigh split-thickness skin graft?

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive transparent film dressing (otolaryngology service) or Xeroform petroleum gel impregnated gauze dressing (surgical oncology service) after surgery.

ARM II: Patients receive native collagen wound dressing after surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Population of otolaryngological or surgical oncology patients experiencing an autologous split-thickness skin graft as part of their surgical procedure
  • Patients will have a Glasgow Coma score of 15 (or 10 with a tracheostomy)
  • Patient donor sites will be limited to the anterior thigh
  • Patients will be free of documented circulatory deficits, neuropathy, or mental illness which prohibits their ability to independently consent or respond to questions regarding pain
  • Patients will be able to give consent independently
  • Patients will be able to read and write in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to give independent consent for any reason
  • Skin graft donor sites other than the anterior thigh
  • Patients with a concurrent diagnosis of diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and/or paresthesias or paralysis of the lower extremities
  • Patients who are unable to complete a self-report pain scale
  • Patients who are prisoners
  • Patients who are known active alcoholics
  • Patients on steroids or other medications known to affect healing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (control)
Patients receive transparent film dressing (otolaryngology service) or Xeroform petroleum gel impregnated gauze dressing (surgical oncology service) after surgery.
Ancillary studies
Receive transparent film dressing or Xeroform petroleum gel impregnated gauze dressing
Receive native collagen wound dressing
Experimental: Arm II (native collagen wound dressing)
Patients receive native collagen wound dressing after surgery.
Ancillary studies
Receive transparent film dressing or Xeroform petroleum gel impregnated gauze dressing
Receive native collagen wound dressing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score ranging in value from 0 to 10
Time Frame: Up to 14 days
Initial analyses will include two sample t-tests (or a nonparametric equivalent, if more appropriate) for each day to compare the mean pain scores for each treatment group. The pain score will be evaluated using multiple linear regression, while multiple logistic or polytomous regression will be used for the categorical outcomes.
Up to 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distress checklist score
Time Frame: Up to 14 days
The specific modeling approach for the distress score will depend on the range of values obtained. Standard model building techniques will be employed and clinically important interactions between covariates and the groups will be explored.
Up to 14 days
Inflammation as measured by the Wound Assessment Inventory (WAI)
Time Frame: Up to 14 days
Up to 14 days
Categorical epithelialization assessment
Time Frame: Up to 14 days
Up to 14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Hofacre, Ohio State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OSU-06043
  • NCI-2012-00985 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on questionnaire administration

3
Subscribe