Stability of Implants With Different Surface Treatment: Randomized Clinical Trial

February 14, 2013 updated by: Érico Castaldin Fraga Moreira, University of Sao Paulo

Objectives: To compare the stability of implant surface treated by dual acid etching (Porous)and implants with anodized surface (Vulcano) over a period of 16 weeks after installation.

Methods: it will be a clinical study with individuals with missing teeth requiring rehabilitation with dental implants in the maxilla and that fulfill the study inclusion criteria. The research sites will be randomized into two groups: the control group patient's sites receive implant surface treated by dual acid (AR Torque Porous, Connection Implant Systems, Aruja, Brazil) and in the test group implants with anodized surface (AR Torque Vulcano-Actives, Connection Implant Systems, Aruja, Brazil). The evaluation of the stability of the implants will be made over 16 weeks, through resonance frequency analysis with Osstell (Integration Diagnostics AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparative.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil, 05508-000
        • Faculdade de Odontologia da USP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who have missing teeth in the maxilla,
  • over 30 years old and under 60 years old,
  • the implant sites with at least 3 months of healing after extraction,
  • the implant sites with width and length to installation of an implant of 4 mm x 10 mm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who experience any of the following conditions:
  • general contraindications for surgical procedures,
  • uncontrolled diabetes,
  • severe bruxism or clenching,
  • pregnant and lactating women,
  • active periodontal disease,
  • smoker and user of alcohol or drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vulcano Actives
Implants 4mm x 10mm Vulcano Actives (anodized surface)(AR Torque Vulcano actives), Conexão Sistemas de Prótese, Arujá, Brasil)will be placed on edentulous area in maxilla
Each week since the surgery the implant stability will be measure with the Osstell mentor to verify the resonance frequence analysis, using the smartpeg number 21
Other Names:
  • Osstell mentor
  • resonance frequence analysis
Active Comparator: Porous
Implants 4mm x 10mm Porous (dual acid-etched surface treatment)(AR Torque Porous, Conexão Sistemas de Prótese, Arujá, Brasil)will be placed on edentulous area in maxilla
Each week since the surgery the implant stability will be measure with the Osstell mentor to verify the resonance frequence analysis, using the smartpeg number 21
Other Names:
  • Osstell mentor
  • resonance frequence analysis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
implant loss
Time Frame: 4 months
During the osseointegration, if the implant lose his stability and if it show spin and if the patient have pain, the implant will be removed and the implant will be considered lost
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ISQ analysis
Time Frame: 6 months
Since the implant installation, for the next 8 weeks, and after for the next 4 months, the implant stability will be measure with the Osstell, that will return a number between 0 and 100. This represents the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ). The difference between the ISQ results will be the secondary outcome measure
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Érico Fraga Moreira, Master of Science, Student of doctoral program

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 3, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 15, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Edentulous Jaws Partially

Clinical Trials on RFA

3
Subscribe