A Randomized Multicentre Trial to Evaluate the Utilization of Revascularization or Optimal Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions (EuroCTO)

June 29, 2019 updated by: Euro CTO Club

CTOs are common among patients with angina, and are detected in around 20% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Treatment of CTO has been found to constitute only 7% of PCI practice on average. One of the reasons for the under-presentation of CTOs in PCI target lesions is the lack of evidence-based medical data on treatment indications, and the continued low level of accepted evidence for the treatment of CTOs by PCI in PCI guidelines.

Patients with a CTO represent patients with stable coronary artery disease. The COURAGE trial comparing PCI with optimal medical therapy in stable coronary disease did not show a difference in mortality or myocardial infarction between the two treatment options. However, CTOs were not included in the COURAGE trial. But that trial did confirm the superiority of PCI over OMT in controlling symptoms of angina, with a high cross-over rate to PCI. Whether PCI for CTO is superior to OMT in reducing MACE in those patients with a large ischaemic burden has never been tested in a randomized controlled trial.

While there is compelling evidence from registry studies of a clinical and prognostic benefit following successful PCI of CTO compared with PCI failure, there has been no randomized controlled trial of contemporary PCI using drug-eluting stents versus optimal medical therapy. The COURAGE trial nuclear sub-study confirms both that prognosis is closely related to the extent of residual ischaemia and that PCI is more effective in reducing residual ischaemia than optimal medical therapy alone. This confirms earlier retrospective data suggesting that the benefit of PCI is greatest in patients with moderate (10-20%) or severe (>20%) ischaemia.

Study hypothesis: PCI with Biolimus eluting stent implantation plus OMT will be superior to OMT alone in improving health status at 12-month follow-up, and will be noninferior with respect to the composite of all cause death/ non fatal MI at 36-month follow up, in patients with a CTO in an epicardial coronary artery >2.5 mm diameter and chronic stable angina with evidence of ischemia and viability in the territory subtended by the CTO

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

450

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33074
        • Clinique Saint-Augustin
      • Lagny, France, 77405
        • CH de Lagny
      • Massy, France, 91300
        • Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier - ICPS
      • Toulouse, France, 31076
        • Clinique Pasteur
      • Toulouse, France, 31076
        • Rangueil University Hospital
      • Bad Berka, Germany, 99438
        • Zentralklinik Bad Berka
      • Bad Krozingen, Germany, 79189
        • Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen
      • Bad Soden, Germany, 65812
        • Main Taunus Kliniken
      • Darmstadt, Germany, 64283
        • Klinikum Darmstadt
      • Catania, Italy, 95126
        • Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Cardiovascular Interventional Unit Cannizzaro Hospita
      • Riga, Latvia, 1002
        • Latvian Center of Cardiology Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08025
        • Unidad de Cardiología Intervencionista Hospital de Sant Pau
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clinic Villaroel
      • Galdakao, Spain, 48960
        • Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Cardiovascular Institute - Hospital Clinico San Carlos
      • Brighton, United Kingdom, BN2 5BE
        • Royal Sussex County Hospital - Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH16 4SA
        • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
      • Leicester, United Kingdom, LE3 9QP
        • Department of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leicester
      • London, United Kingdom, SW7 2AZ
        • National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years of age with written informed consent
  • CTO in native coronary artery
  • a) Stable angina, or b) myocardial ischaemia in a territory supplied by CTO, and c) viability in akinetic myocardium (<50% transmural late enhancement on MRI or normal resting perfusion scan)
  • CTO located in segments 1-3 (RCA), 6-7 (LAD), 11-12 (LCx)
  • target artery ≥2.5mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • AMI or NSTE-ACS within 1 month
  • Significant untreated coronary stenosis in a territory other than CTO
  • Patients with MVD and significant non-CTO stenoses where it is deemed unsafe to treat the non-CTO lesion first (e.g. Significant proximal LAD lesion with chronically occluded RCA)
  • Patient unsuitable for 12 month dual anti-platelet therapy
  • Any exclusion criteria for PCI or DES
  • Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Biolimus-eluting stent implantation
PCI of CTO using a Biomatrix drug-eluting stent system + optimal medical therapy.
Recanalization of chronic coronary artery occlusion and subsequent implantation of one or ore Biosensor stents
Other Names:
  • Biosensors Biolimus-eluting stents of all sizes and lengths
NO_INTERVENTION: Medical therapy
Optimal medical therapy. Subsequent PCI only if symptoms of angina persist despite optimal medical therapy. At least 2 anti-anginal agents or the maximum tolerated anti-anginal therapy should be used before crossover. Medical therapy should include adequate ventricular rate-limiting medication (i.e. Beta-blocker or rate-limiting calcium antagonist) where appropriate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
Seattle Angina Questionnaire and EQ-5D for health outcomes measurement
Baseline and 12 months
Major cardiovascular events
Time Frame: 36 months
Cumulative composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI at 3 years
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety and efficacy endpoints
Time Frame: 12 and 36 months
All cause mortality Cardiac mortality Myocardial Infarction Any hospitalization due to cardiovascular events (angina, congestive heart failure, arrythmias) Repeat revascularization
12 and 36 months
Procedural complications
Time Frame: baseline upto 36 months
Incl. periprocedural enzyme leak (defined by CK increase >3 times ULN); pericprocedural MI (new Q-wave or STEMI); pericardial tamponade, need for urgent CABG, CIN, death within 30 days, proven periprocedural cerebrovascular events
baseline upto 36 months
Protocol adherence
Time Frame: 36 months
Need to cross from OMT to PCI in Group 2 (after escalation up to maximum tolerated anti-anginal therapy and persistent unequivocal symptoms)
36 months
Per protocol analysis
Time Frame: 36 months
primary endpoint comparison in patients who did have a successful revascularization compared to those patients treated medically who had no subsequent PCI
36 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-economic analysis
Time Frame: 12 and 36 months
Economic assessment & cost efficacy
12 and 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gerald S Werner, MD PhD, Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 1, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 1, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 3, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 2, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Occlusion

Clinical Trials on Biolimus-eluting stent implantation

3
Subscribe