Efficacy of Laser Versus Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Warts

November 4, 2019 updated by: Shichao Lu, The 306 Hospital of People's Liberation Army

Cryotherapy Versus Laser for the Treatment of Nongenital Cutaneous Warts: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of laser versus cryotherapy on the treatment of warts

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cutaneous warts were a common skin diseases caused by human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. Although warts may spontaneously resolve, many patients seek for treatment for various reasons. There are many kinds of treatments for cutaneous warts, including salicylic acid, cryotherapy, laser, etc. A recent high quality RCT confirmed that the cure rate of topical salicylic acid and frozen has no difference at six months, but the efficacy of laser versus cryotherapy on the treatment of warts remains unclear. Therefore, we designed a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of laser versus cryotherapy on the treatment of warts.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100101
        • The 306 Hospital of PLA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients have cutaneous warts, including common warts(d≥1cm or n≥5 ), plantar warts, periungual warts, mosaic warts, which are suitable for cryotherapy and laser treatment .
  • patients aged eighting years and over, who have junior school degree or above

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have more than 20 warts
  • Patients who are currently participating in another trial for the treatment of their warts
  • Patients who took immunosuppressant drugs such as oral corticosteroids within the past three months.
  • Patients who are pregnant or ready for pregnancies or breast-feeding.
  • Patients who have impaired healing eg due to diabetes, vascular disease, vitamin A deficiency, hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.
  • Patients who have autoimmune diseases, eg SLE, dermatomyositis, scleroderma and other diseases .
  • Patients who have cold intolerance, eg cold urticaria, cryoglobulinaemia, cold agglutinin syndrome, Raynaud's syndrome.
  • Patients who have local injections intolerance.
  • Patients who have local hypoesthesia .
  • Patients who can not tolerate cryotherapy or laser treatment for their own reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Cryotherapy
Cryotherapy, at most 4 times
up to a maximum of four treatments every 21-28 days
EXPERIMENTAL: laser
laser, at most 4 times
up to a maximum of four treatments every 21-28 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cure rate
Time Frame: Cure rate will be calculated at 16 weeks and 6 months from the first treatment
Warts was considered cured if they was no longer visible and could not be palpated anymore by hand. Assessment of whether or not cured was performed on site by a senior dermatologist
Cure rate will be calculated at 16 weeks and 6 months from the first treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
effective rate
Time Frame: Effective rate will be calculated at 16 weeks from the first treatment
Effective assessment is performed by a senior dermatologist.
Effective rate will be calculated at 16 weeks from the first treatment
recurrence rate
Time Frame: Recurrence rate will be calculated at 12 months from the first treatment
A wart was considered recurrence if there are abnormalities or palpated foreign body in the original place.
Recurrence rate will be calculated at 12 months from the first treatment
average cure days
Time Frame: Average cure days will be calculated at 6 months from the first treatment
Cure days was defined as the period from the first treatment until the date of clearance.
Average cure days will be calculated at 6 months from the first treatment
side effects
Time Frame: Side effects will be assessed within 3-4 weeks after each treatment
including pain, swelling, blisters, blood blisters, bruising, bleeding,scarring, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation.
Side effects will be assessed within 3-4 weeks after each treatment
pain intensity
Time Frame: Pain intensity will be assessed within 3-4 weeks after each treatment
on a scale of 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is extremely painful
Pain intensity will be assessed within 3-4 weeks after each treatment
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Patient satisfactionwill be assessed within 3-4 weeks after each treatment
on a five-point scale, from 'very satisfied' to 'very satisfied'
Patient satisfactionwill be assessed within 3-4 weeks after each treatment
treatment costs
Time Frame: Treatment costs will be recorded within 10 minutes after each treatment
record the cost after each treatment
Treatment costs will be recorded within 10 minutes after each treatment
relationship between HPV type and curative effect
Time Frame: Relationship between HPV type and curative effect will be analyzed at 16 weeks and 6 months from the first treatment
take a small amount of cutaneous warts lesions and extract HPV DNA before treatment
Relationship between HPV type and curative effect will be analyzed at 16 weeks and 6 months from the first treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shichao Lu, MD, Dermatology Deparment of the 306 Hospital of PLA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Warts

Clinical Trials on Cryotherapy

3
Subscribe