Optimizing Communication During Ventilation (PHONOVNI)

February 12, 2016 updated by: Helene Prigent, Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805

Optimizing Communication During Nasal Mechanical Ventilation

Mechanical ventilation is one of the only treatment that has improved survival of patients with neuromuscular respiratory failure. As disease progresses, some patients may require longer ventilation period. Non invasive mechanical ventilation is the preferred method of ventilation but it may interfere with speech and communication of patients who require ventilation throughout the day. The investigators are evaluating the effect on speech and communication of a ventilation device which allows patients to momentarily and voluntarily withhold ventilation if they want to speak. This should allow the patients to have a more fluid speech.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Garches, France, 92380
        • Hôpital Raymond Poincaré

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with restrictive respiratory failure secondary to a neuromuscular disorder, without any bulbar involvement.
  • Age greater than or equal to 18.
  • Hospitalization in Home Ventilation Unit of the intensive care department of R. Poincaré Hospital.
  • Non invasive mechanical ventilation for a duration equal or above 14h per day.
  • Patient in a steady state at the time of the study
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient's refusal to participate to the study
  • Inability to read the selected text
  • Inability to use the ventilator switch
  • Inability to cooperate
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Acute respiratory failure
  • No affiliation to social security

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: No ventilation switch control
Neuromuscular patients non invasively ventilated in a stable state at the time of the study testing an usual (with no ventilation switch control) Elysee 150 ventilator while speaking
Other Names:
  • Elysee 150 - Resmed
Active Comparator: Ventilation switch control
Neuromuscular patients non invasively ventilated in a stable state at the time of the study testing an Elysee 150 ventilator with a ventilation switch control allowing them to control ventilation while speaking
Other Names:
  • Elysee 150 ventilator - Resmed - with a ventilation switch control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of patient's ventilation control on speech efficiency
Time Frame: 1 hour 30 min
Speech efficiency will be evaluated while using a ventilator which allows the patient to constantly control when he wants to be ventilated Speech evaluation is based on speech rhythm and text reading duration
1 hour 30 min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient ventilator synchronisation during speech
Time Frame: 1hour 30 min
Evaluated with the variation of respiratory frequency during speech, the number of auto-triggered ventilation cycles during speech.
1hour 30 min
User friendliness of the ventilator during speech
Time Frame: 1hour 30 min
evaluation of user friendliness by the patient using a visual analogical score
1hour 30 min
Respiratory comfort during speech
Time Frame: 1hour 30 min
evaluation of user friendliness by the patient using a visual analogical score and the Borg score
1hour 30 min
Speech comfort during ventilation
Time Frame: 1hour 30 min
evaluation of speech comfort during ventilation by the patient using a visual analogical score
1hour 30 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helene PRIGENT, MDPHD, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Elysee 150 ventilator

3
Subscribe