N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for Improving Cognitive Dysfunction in Schizophrenia (NACSZ)

June 2, 2015 updated by: Michael C. Davis, M.D., Ph.D., VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Dietary Supplement N-acetylcysteine (NAC) as a Novel Complementary Medicine to Improve Cognitive Disfunction in Schizophrenia

This study will evaluate the effect of the dietary supplement N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on electrophysiologic (EEG) markers related to cognition, as well as performance on psychological tests measuring cognition. The primary hypothesis is that participants treated with NAC will show improvements in cognitive function, as measured by EEG and performance-based tests.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Schizophrenia is a serious mental illness associated with substantial social and occupational dysfunction. While positive psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia often respond to antipsychotic medications, negative symptoms and cognitive impairment are difficult to treat, necessitating novel interventions. Cognitive deficits are an important treatment target because the degree of cognitive impairment is a critical predictor of work, education, and social functioning.

Glutamatergic receptors are among the most promising biological targets for cognitive-enhancing drugs in schizophrenia. Abnormal glutamatergic signaling has long been thought to be important in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia; specifically, reduced NMDA glutamatergic receptor activity on thalamic inhibitory neurons disinhibits glutamatergic neurons projecting to the cortex, which can cause secondary dopaminergic abnormalities and lead to characteristic symptoms, including cognitive deficits. Many electrophysiological (EEG) biomarkers related to cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia are thought to be linked to deficient NMDA glutamatergic neurotransmission. Additionally, neuroplasticity is thought to involve glutamatergic signaling. This pattern of linkages suggests that correcting impaired NMDA glutamatergic transmission in schizophrenia could lead to enhanced cognitive function and learning.

In this pilot study, we will focus on a promising dietary supplement approach to address glutamatergic deficits, evaluating its effects by EEG biomarkers and performance-based neurocognitive assessments. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a modified amino acid that is commonly used as a dietary supplement because of its antioxidant properties. NAC modulates glutamatergic signaling as follows: In the CNS, glial cells take up NAC via cystine-glutamate antiporters, which in turn leads to increased glutamate efflux into the extracellular space. Extracellular glutamate binds to non-synaptic glutamate receptors such as the metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR) type 2/3 and type 5. The net result of these events is a normalization of pathologically elevated cortical glutamate levels.

We will assess EEG biomarkers associated with cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, including a recently-described biomarker for visual cortical plasticity. We will also perform a comprehensive assessment of neurocognition with the MATRICS battery, which could suggest whether certain cognitive domains are sensitive to improvement with NAC therapy.

Our primary aim is to determine whether NAC administration will improve NMDA-dependent EEG abnormalities in schizophrenia. We have 3 hypotheses: (1) NAC administration will increase mismatch negativity amplitude as compared to placebo; (2) NAC administration will increase P300 amplitude as compared to placebo; and (3) NAC administration will increase gamma oscillation power and phase synchronization as compared to placebo. We also will examine whether NAC will improve measures of visual neuroplasticity, performance-based measures of neurocognition, and clinical symptoms of schizophrenia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • VA West Los Angeles Healthcare Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Meets DSM-IV-TR criteria for schizophrenia.
  2. At least 3 months since any psychiatric hospitalization
  3. At least 1 month since meeting criteria for having a major depressive episode
  4. At least 6 months since any behaviors suggesting any potential danger to self or others
  5. Currently prescribed an antipsychotic medication, with dose not varying >50% over 3 months prior to study participation
  6. No acute medical problems that could interfere with study participation
  7. Chronic medical problems consistently treated and stable for at least 3 months prior to participation
  8. Ability to provide informed consent and cooperate with study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Documented history of IQ less than 70 or severe learning disability
  2. History of treatment with electroconvulsive therapy within 6 months prior to study participation
  3. History of neurological or neuropsychiatric condition (e.g., stroke, severe traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) that could confound assessments
  4. Documented history of persistent substance abuse or dependence within 3 months prior to study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: N-acetylcysteine (NAC)
Capsules containing N-acetylcysteine 600mg, with inactive ingredients of cellulose, L-leucine, and silica used as filler. Dosage is 2 capsules by mouth twice daily for 8 weeks.
Other Names:
  • NAC
  • N-acetyl-L-cysteine
Placebo Comparator: Inactive placebo capsule
A placebo capsule is used that is identical to the active treatment but lacks NAC. The inactive ingredients in the placebo capsule are cellulose, L-leucine, and silica. Dose is 2 capsules by mouth twice daily for 8 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Placebo capsule
  • Sugar pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EEG: Change in Mismatch Negativity Amplitude
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
A passive attention auditory oddball paradigm will be used to assess MMN.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
EEG: Change in P300 Amplitude
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
P300 will be measured using an active attention auditory oddball paradigm.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
EEG: Change in Gamma Synchrony Evoked Power and Phase Synchronization
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Stimuli will consist of 1-msec 93-dB clicks presented in 500-msec trains presented at 40 Hz, in 3 separate blocks with 200 trials per block. Continuous data will be epoched at -100 to 700 ms relative to stimulus onset and baseline corrected to the average of the prestimulus interval. For evoked gamma power analyses, averages will be computed on a minimum of 120 artifact-free epochs in each block. The averaged epochs across the click trains (0-512 msec) will be transformed into power spectra by fast Fourier transform (FFT). The 40-Hz power spectra will be averaged across 36-45 Hz. Time/frequency intertrial coherence analyses will be performed to assess intertrial coherence of the stimulus-driven EEG signals. In this analysis, coherence ranges from 0 (non-phase-locked random activity) to 1 (activity that is fully locked in phase across individual trials). Responses at electrode Fz will be analyzed.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EEG: Change in Visual Cortical Plasticity
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
The paradigm involves assessing visual evoked potentials (VEPs) before and after exposure to tetanizing visual high-frequency stimulation (HFS).
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Change in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery composite score
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
The MCCB was developed as a standardized method to assess cognition in clinical trials of potential cognitive-enhancing drugs. It consists of ten tests which assess seven cognitive domains (processing speed, attention, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, problem solving and reasoning, and social cognition).
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
This is a widely-used instrument that assesses 30 different symptoms (categorized into positive, negative, and general psychopathology) on a scale from 1 to 7, based on clinical interview.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Change in Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) scores
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
The CAINS is comprised of two subscales that assess the major negative symptom subdomains: 1) Motivation and Pleasure and 2) Expression. This instrument is administered in a semi-structured clinical interview and each of 13 items is rated on a scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 4 (severe deficit).
Change from baseline to 8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MIRECC Global Assessment of Functioning (MIRECC GAF)
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks
This is a version of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale in which occupational functioning, social functioning, and symptom severity are scored on a scale of 1-100, with lower scores indicating more impairment in each of the three domains.
4 weeks, 8 weeks
Clinical Global Impression (CGI-S and CGI-I
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks
The CGI-S (severity scale) is a widely-used rating scale in which the clinician rates the severity of the subject's mental illness, relative to their past experience with patients with the same diagnosis, on a scale from 1-7, with 1 = normal, not at all ill and 7 = extremely ill. The CGI-I (improvement scale) requires the clinician to rate on a scale from 1-7 how much the mental illness has improved or worsened, relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention, where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse.
4 weeks, 8 weeks
Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) Side Effects Rating Scale:
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
This scale was developed as a comprehensive side effect rating scale for psychopharmacologic medications, with 48 side effects organized into categories.
2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS)
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks
The most widely-used rating scale to assess the presence and severity of akathisia, the BAS comprises 4 items that rate objective and subjective awareness, subjective distress, and global clinical assessment of akathisia.
4 weeks, 8 weeks
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
This scale was developed as a screening tool to assess ideation and behaviors associated with suicide risk.
2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen R Marder, M.D., VA Greater Los Angeles
  • Principal Investigator: Michael C Davis, M.D., Ph.D., VA Greater Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 4, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on N-acetylcysteine (NAC)

3
Subscribe