Ultrasound Guided Core Biopsy vs Fine Needle Aspiration for Evaluation of Axillary Lymphadenopathy

August 6, 2013 updated by: Marie Ganott, University of Pittsburgh

Ultrasound Guided Core Biopsy vs Fine Needle Aspiration for Evaluation of Axillary Lymphadenopathy in Patients Suspected of Having Breast Cancer.

The study was performed to determine if either ultrasound guided core biopsy or fine needle aspiration of an axillary lymph node has superior sensitivity in detecting metastatic carcinoma from the ipsilateral breast.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Women with suspected or recently diagnosed breast cancer and ipsilateral abnormal appearing axillary lymph nodes underwent fine needle aspiration immediately followed by core biopsy of the same lymph node.Cytology results from the fine needle aspiration (FNA)and histology from the core biopsy were compared to surgical pathology from axillary node excision to determine if either method of percutaneous node sampling was more sensitive in detecting metastasis. Pain during each procedure was also compared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Magee Womens Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with breast cancer and abnormal ipsilateral axillary nodes visible on sonography.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to understand consent form.
  • Emotionally unprepared to discuss possibility of axillary metastasis
  • Node not amenable to core biopsy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Breast cancer and Axillary Adenopathy
Women with breast cancer with abnormal appearing ipsilateral axillary nodes undergoing fine needle aspiration and core biopsy of a lymph node.
Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of an abnormal lymph node followed by ultrasound guided core biopsy of the same node followed by clip placement into the node.
Patients underwent axillary node dissection or excision of setinel axillary nodes at the time of surgical treatment of their breast cancer.
A titanium marker was deposited into the lymph node that was percutaneously biopsied , immediately after the last tissue sample obtained.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fraction of metastatic nodes found at axillary surgery that were identified pre-surgically by FNA vs. core biopsy
Time Frame: 1 week to 10 months
Results of FNA cytology and core biopsy histology are compared to axillary surgery results.
1 week to 10 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain associated with each type of percutaneous biopsy procedure
Time Frame: immediate at time of biopsy
Patients were asked to report pain level during the 2 types of percutaneous biopsy.
immediate at time of biopsy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 9, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 9, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRO07100450

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Focus: Breast Cancer With Axillary Node Metastasis

Clinical Trials on Fine needle aspiration and core biopsy of lymph node

3
Subscribe