Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hippocampal Avoidance on the Cognitive Toxicity of Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy After Surgical Resection of Single Brain Metastasis of Breast Cancer

August 10, 2018 updated by: Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Double-blind Randomized Multicenter Phase III Study Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hippocampal Avoidance on the Cognitive Toxicity of Whole-brain Radiation Therapy After Surgical Resection of Single Brain Metastasis of Breast Cancer.

The incidence of brain metastases (BM) in metastatic breast cancer is increasing, due to the improvement in the control of systemic disease, and due to an improved detection through imagery.

The treatment management of single BM remains controversial. Indeed, even though it is widely accepted that local treatment increases the median survival time in patients having a good prognostic status, the adding of "adjuvant" whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is currently subject to controversy, due to its potential toxicity. Yet, two randomized trials have demonstrated a clear increase in intra-cerebral recurrence and in death from neurologic origin in case of absence of "adjuvant" WBRT, without change in overall survival (but overall survival was not a primary endpoint in any of these studies).

The data from literature on cognitive toxicity (CT) of WBRT on BM are scarce and sometimes controversial. CT of WBRT affects the subcortical frontal functions. It is postulated that the alteration of hippocampal neurogenesis (mainly due to inflammation process), situated in the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus, has an essential role in the development of these brain dysfunctions.

It has been shown that the incidence of BM in the hippocampal region (hippocampus + 5mm expansion) is low, in the range of 8,6%.

New irradiation techniques, in particular intensity-modulated radiotherapy associated with rotational radiotherapy, allow to modulate the dose on an intra-cerebral structure, all the while distributing an adapted dose to the remaining brain.

This prospective, randomized study, will compare, through a battery of neuropsychological tests, the cognitive impact of WBRT of 40 Gy in 20 fractions with or without hippocampal avoidance by intensity modulated radiotherapy, in patients presenting with a single operated brain metastasis of breast cancer. If the hippocampal avoidance leads to a significant improvement in cognitive function, this radiotherapy scheme could become the standard postoperative treatment to be proposed to patients presenting the best prognostic factors. This would allow to prevent long-term cognitive deficit, while preserving WBRT benefit on intra-cerebral control.

Justification of evaluation criteria :

Principal criteria :

Evaluation criteria to assess cognitive toxicity have been selected on the basis of the recommendations from C. Meyers and P. Brown, who propose an adapted test battery to evaluate memory, verbal function, visual and motor coordination, and executive function. The selected tests have been validated, also in French. They comprise HVLT-R (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised), COWAT (Controlled Oral Word Association Test), Grooved Pegboard test, TMT A and B (Trailmaking tests A and B), and MMSE. The calculation of patient numbers was based on the HVLT-R test, as memory is thought to be the most frequently affected domain.

The tests will be performed before treatment ("baseline" cognitive function), at 4 months and at 12 months. In case of a missing answer to the evaluation tests, the reason(s) for not answering will be noted.

Secondary criteria :

Quality of life : QLQ-C30, QLQ-BN20, ADL, IADL Intra-cerebral Progression-free survival (PFS) Overall survival.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13009
        • Agnès TALLET

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > or equal 18 years old,
  • Single brain metastasis from breast cancer, first cerebral event,
  • Complete surgical resection of cerebral metastasis,
  • Histological confirmation of brain metastasis of breast cancer,
  • Start of radiotherapy within 6 weeks after surgery,
  • Karnofsky > or equal to 70,
  • No history of brain radiotherapy,
  • Signed informed consent to participate,
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system or benefiting from such a system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases,
  • macroscopic metastasis surgery not complete,
  • Warning signs of brain displacement (uncontrolled oedema),
  • History of cerebral irradiation or absence of surgical treatment of the current metastasis,
  • History of cancer in the previous 5 years prior to entry in the study, other than cutaneous basal cell carcinoma or in situ epithelioma of uterine cervix or the stated breast cancer,
  • MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination)< 24,
  • all previous systemic treatments less than 2 weeks are not allowed,
  • Pregnant women or liable to become pregnant, lactating women,
  • Persons deprived of their freedom or under tutelage
  • Patients unable to comply with medical procedures of the study for geographical, social, or psychological reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: conventional postoperative whole-brain radiation therapy
conventional postoperative whole-brain radiation therapy (40 Gy in 20 fractions of 2 Gy)
Radiation
Other: whole-brain radiation therapy with hippocampal avoidance
Radiation therapy with hippocampal avoidance
Radiation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess cognitive toxicity
Time Frame: From inclusion/randomization to 12 months
Evaluation criteria to assess cognitive toxicity have been selected on the basis of the recommendations from C. Meyers and P. Brown, who propose an adapted test battery to evaluate memory, verbal function, visual and motor coordination, and executive function. The selected tests have been validated, also in French. They comprise HVLT-R (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised), COWAT (Controlled Oral Word Association Test), Grooved Pegboard test, TMT A and B (Trailmaking tests A and B), and MMSE. The calculation of patient numbers was based on the HVLT-R test, as memory is thought to be the most frequently affected domain.
From inclusion/randomization to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: up to 24 months
up to 24 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: At inclusion/randomization, at month 1, month 4 and month 12
Quality of life : QLQ-C30, QLQ-BN20, ADL, IADL. Intra-cerebral Progression-free survival (PFS) up to 24 months. Overall survival up to 24 months.
At inclusion/randomization, at month 1, month 4 and month 12
Intra-cerebral progression
Time Frame: Evaluated every 3 months
to assess by RMI or clinical signs
Evaluated every 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Agnès TALLET, MD, Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 6, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Radiation therapy Brain metastasis in breast cancer

3
Subscribe