DELTA Trial: Does Embolization With Larger Coils Lead to Better Treatment of Aneurysms Trial (DELTA)

Endovascular treatment with platinum coils is safe and effective in preventing rebleeding of intracranial aneurysms. Unfortunately, endovascular treatment of aneurysms with coils has been associated with incomplete occlusion at initial treatment (remnant) or at follow-up (recurrence). This in some studies has been as high as 20%. While many such aneurysm remnants or recurrences exhibit benign behavior, many require retreatment to prevent future hemorrhage.

A recent randomized controlled trial of aneurysm coiling revealed that aneurysms between 2 and 9.9 mm diameter were more likely to have an improved angiographic and composite clinical outcome when treated with hydrogel-coated coils, an improvement inferred to result from higher packing density afforded by hydrogel expansion(1). The use of hydrogel coils is associated with technical difficulties related to expansion and limited time for deployment. The investigators theorize that similar results could be achieved by using more voluminous bare platinum coils, leading to improved packing density compared to smaller caliber coils, and thus result in lower incidence of remnants or residuals. The relationship between packing densities and composite clinical endpoints having never been shown in a robust fashion, the investigators therefore propose a randomized clinical trial opposing coiling with soft 15-caliber coils to 10-caliber bare platinum coils in aneurysms varying in size from 3 to 9.9 mm.

To test the hypothesis that 15-caliber coiling systems are superior to standard 10-caliber coils in achieving better composite outcomes, the investigators propose the DELTA trial: Does Embolization with Larger coils lead to better Treatment of Aneurysms trial, a randomized controlled blinded trial with 2 subgroups of 282 patients each, 564 total:

Subgroup 1: Coiled with a maximum proportion of 15-caliber coils as conditions allow Subgroup 2: Coiled with 10-caliber coils.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

210

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
        • Foothills Medical Center
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
        • University of Alberta Hospital
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 3A7
        • Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • Ottawa Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
        • Toronto Western Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 0C1
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
        • University of Illinois at Chicago
    • Massachusetts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
        • University of Massachusetts Medical School
    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States
        • Stony Brook University Medical Center (SUNY)
      • Syracuse, New York, United States
        • SUNY Upstate Medical University
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
        • University of Tennessee Medical Center
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
        • University of Virginia Health System
    • West Virginia
      • Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
        • West Virginia University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least one ruptured or unruptured aneurysms with a dimension ≥ 10 mm (longest axis)
  • for ruptured lesions, patients should be in World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade < IV.
  • The anatomy of the lesion is such that endovascular treatment is possible with both types of coils (not necessarily certain or probable)
  • Patient is 18 or older
  • Life expectancy is more than 2 years (able to complete follow-up)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with planned treatment of an associated cerebral arteriovenous malformations
  • When parent vessel occlusion, without simultaneous endosaccular coiling of the aneurysm, is the primary intent of the procedure
  • Any absolute contraindication to endovascular treatment, angiography, or anaesthesia such as severe allergies to contrast or medications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 15-caliber platinum coils
Endovascular embolization coiling using 15-caliber platinum coils
Embolization using 15-caliber platinum coils or standard 10-caliber platinum coils.
Active Comparator: 10-caliber coils
Endovascular embolization coiling using standard 10-caliber platinum coils
Embolization using 15-caliber platinum coils or standard 10-caliber platinum coils.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major Recurrence of Lesion or Presence of Residual Aneurysm
Time Frame: 1 year
Major radiographic recurrence of the lesion or the presence of a 'residual aneurysm' as judged by core lab
1 year
Hemorrhage During the Follow-up Period
Time Frame: Within 1 year following coiling
Post-treatment hemorrhage experienced during follow-up period.
Within 1 year following coiling
Retreatment of the Same Lesion by Endovascular or Surgical Means
Time Frame: Within 1 year following coiling
Retreatment of the same lesion by endovascular or surgical means during the follow-up period
Within 1 year following coiling
Initial Treatment Failure
Time Frame: Within 1 year following coiling
Inability to treat aneurysm, either because access to aneurysm is difficult or technical issues.
Within 1 year following coiling
Related Morbidity
Time Frame: Within 1 year following coiling
Morbidity that precludes follow up
Within 1 year following coiling
Related Mortality
Time Frame: Within 1 year following coiling
Mortality that precludes follow up
Within 1 year following coiling

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Packing Density
Time Frame: within the first 3 days after coiling
Packing density with the number of coils implanted
within the first 3 days after coiling
Procedural Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Within 6 months following coiling
Procedural-related serious adverse events
Within 6 months following coiling
Modified Rankin Score (mRS) Greater Than 2
Time Frame: at 1 year follow-up
Modified Rankin Score (mRS) that is greater than 2 at 1 year follow-up (or at last follow-up, if applicable). Minimum = 0 (no symptoms), maximum = 6 (Deceased).
at 1 year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean Raymond, MD, Centre hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 13, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 17, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Aneurysm

3
Subscribe