Prognostic Value of Stress SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Half Dose 99mTc-Tetrofosmin

April 12, 2017 updated by: Renee Hessian, Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Prognostic Value of Stress SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Half Dose 99mTc-tetrofosmin

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality and prognostic ability of low dose 99mTc-tetrofosmin Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Imaging.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to determine if myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using a new SPECT reconstruction software and a low dose (LD) of 99mTC-tetrofosmin will provide equal quality and prognostic value as a full dose (FD) of 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging methodology.

The images of clinical patients from the Diagnostic Imaging Department will be assessed and compared for image quality and myocardial perfusion. The outcomes of participants that have had FD studies will be compared to those who have had LD studies. Consented participants will be contacted and will be asked to provide information on their cardiovascular health since the date of their LD or FD scan, such as non fatal myocardial infarction, death, congestive heart failure, admission to hospital with chest pain, further cardiac diagnostic testing, including angiography and early and late revascularization. The event information will be tabulated at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for the LD and FD studies.

The study hypothesizes that there will be no difference in the quality and prognostic value between the LD and FD 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT MPI imaging protocols. The study hypothesizes that there will be no increase in repeat diagnostic testing and angiography with using the LD imaging protocol.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

4000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4W7
        • University of Ottawa Heart Insitute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Clinical patients who have undergone myocardial perfusion imaging.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have completed the FD and LD MPI studies on the GE Infinia Haweye or GE NM 530 (CZT crystal) cameras
  • Retrospective participants must consent to the study interview(s) for data collection
  • Prospective participants must consent to follow up for data collection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling to consent to data collection either retrospectively or in follow up prospectively

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
MPI Perfusion Imaging
Clinical patients who have undergone myocardial perfusion imaging with 99mTc

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiovascular Outcomes
Time Frame: 15 minutes
The primary objective is to compare the cardiovascular outcomes of participants that have had FD studies to those that have had LD studies. These cardiovascular outcomes include myocardial infarction, death, congestive heart failure, hospitalization with chest pain, further diagnostic testing, including angioplasty, and early and late revascularization.
15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Renée Hessian, MD, Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 27, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 27, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20130446-01H

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Disease

3
Subscribe