Visual Guidelines and Tutoring in Pediatric Urological Surgery

October 26, 2016 updated by: Shaare Zedek Medical Center
The aim of this study is checking impact of visual guidelines (picture book) and tutoring in pediatric urologic surgery

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The number of operations in pediatric urology performed on the basis of one day surgery has been increased tremendously over the last years. The shortening of the hospital admission intends to increase the efficacy of the health system, however at the same time puts an additional burdening regarding the postoperative care on the parents of the operated children. The parents often have no or has little experience with regards to the basic medical education. The lack of the proper tutoring in terms of possible complications, normal postoperative period may cause unnecessary patients and parents anxiety, visit to the emergency room or calls to the medical stuff, and in some case delay medical attention which can cause major surgery related complications. Visual guidelines and tutoring of the patients upon surgery may avoid these undesirable effects of the early hospital discharge

Patients and methods:

The investigators are proposing prospective study of 3 groups of patients which undergo the most often urological surgery Group 1 penile surgery, Group 2 inguinal surgery. Group 3 renal surgery required nephrostomy tube leave or drainage. Each group will be divided into two subgroups (20 patients each) with and without visual tutoring prior to the surgery. Visual tutoring will include the photograph pictures reflecting different stage of the convalescent period following surgery. The parents will be asked to answer on questionnaire regarding the level of anxiety before surgery, immediately after surgery, week and 3-6 months after surgery. The number of parents calls to the hospital staff, emergency or outpatient clinic visit will be recorded and compared between two groups. The statistical analysis will performed utilizing Graph Pad Prism version 5.00 for Windows, (Graph Pad software, San Diego, California, chi square and Fisher test), considering p value of <0.05 as significant).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jerusalem,, Israel
        • The Department of Pediatric Urology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 months to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children with indications for penile, inguinal or kidney surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prior urological procedure (recurrent cases)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: pictures book + standard education
arm with children undergoing urological procedures and their parents will receive standard preoperative education + pictures book with pictures of surgical wound in different stages of healing
Arm with showing and explaining for parents about perioperative typical surgery site/wound view by study's team
Active Comparator: Standard preoperative education
Arm with children undergoing urological procedures and their parents will receive only standard preoperative education
Arm with standard, verbal explaining for a parents about perioperative site/wound view

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of parents anxiety
Time Frame: Thirty minutes before surgery
The following parameters will be compared between two groups: level of parents anxiety by questionnaire, numbers of parents calls to the hospital staff and non-planed visits to emergency department/outpatient clinic
Thirty minutes before surgery
Level of parents anxiety
Time Frame: Fifteen minutes after surgery
Measuring of parents anxiety in recovery room after surgery
Fifteen minutes after surgery
Level of parents anxiety
Time Frame: Week after surgery
Measuring of parents anxiety one week after surgery
Week after surgery
Level of parents anxiety
Time Frame: Three weeks after surgery
Measuring of parents anxiety 3-6 weeks after surgery
Three weeks after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numbers of parents non-planed calls/visits
Time Frame: During a week before surgery
We will note in two groups all non-planned calls/visits before surgery
During a week before surgery
Numbers of parents non-planed calls/visits
Time Frame: During 48 hours after surgery
We will note in two groups all non-planned calls/visits during 48 hours after surgery
During 48 hours after surgery
Numbers of parents non-planed calls/visits
Time Frame: 0ne week after surgery
We will note in two groups all non-planned calls/visits one week after surgery
0ne week after surgery
Numbers of parents non-planed calls/visits
Time Frame: During 3-6 weeks after surgery
We will note in two groups of patients all non-planed calls/visits 3-6 weeks after surgery
During 3-6 weeks after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Boris Chertin, MD, Prof., Head, The Department of Pediatric Urology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Clinical Professor in Surgery/Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 20, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 27, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Picture book

3
Subscribe