HARMONEE - Japan-USA Harmonized Assessment by Randomized, Multi-Center Study of OrbusNEich's Combo StEnt (HARMONEE)

April 18, 2022 updated by: OrbusNeich

Japan-USA Harmonized Assessment by Randomized, Multi-Center Study of OrbusNEich's Combo StEnt (Japan-USA HARMONEE): Assessment of a Novel DES Platform For Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Coronary Disease and NSTEMI Acute Coronary Syndrome

This is a multi-center, single-blind, randomized, active-controlled, clinical trial in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) subjects. Subjects will be randomized to receive the Combo stent as the investigational treatment arm or an Everolimus Eluting Stent (EES) as the active-control arm.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Up to 50 sites are proposed in Japan and the United States to enroll 286 subjects (271 evaluable) in each of 2 arms, for a total sample size of 572 subjects (542 evaluable) who are admitted to the hospital for a planned (elective and urgent) percutaneous coronary artery intervention procedure.

After stent implantation, subjects will be contacted for follow-up at 30 days; 6 months; and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. At 12 months a clinical evaluation will be completed before cardiac catheterization and angiographic assessment.

Rationale: This study is intended to demonstrate that the Combo stent platform shows superiority to an imputed Bare Metal Stent (BMS) performance goal, noninferior effectiveness and safety vs best-in-class second-generation everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Xience V, Xience Prime, Xience Xpedition stents; [Abbott Vascular/Abbott Vascular Japan]), and evidence of mechanistic activity of the anti-CD34-Ab endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) capture technology with healthy level of intimal tissue coverage superior to that of the best-in-class EES.

To ensure the robustness and interpretability of results, the current proposal includes a number of unique design features:

  • Largest randomized Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) study ever performed in Japan
  • Enriched population, including stabilized Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) subjects with greater likelihood of plaque rupture associated with their clinical syndromes
  • Collaboration between with Japan and the United States as a "Proof of Concept" program under the auspices of the Harmonization by Doing Initiative, Working Group 1 (WG 1), including concomitant enrollment in U.S.A. sites as an FDA-approved Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study
  • Head-to-head randomization against state-of-the-art EES platform control, analyzed for clinical noninferiority
  • Statistical analysis vs imputed BMS analyzed for clinical superiority
  • Fractional flow reserve (FFR) follow-up of 100% of subjects enrolled, providing clinically relevant physiologic assessment of all subjects for 1 year ischemia-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) analysis
  • Mechanistic Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging observations in 140 subjects using 6 French catheters as follows:

    • Cohort A (30 subjects, 1:1 Combo and EES): Mechanistic imaging observations to provide serial 6 month and 1 year OCT evaluation of healthy intimal tissue coverage, intracoronary thrombosis, and stent malapposition and quantitative coronary angiographic (QCA) analysis to assess 1 year late loss.
    • Cohort B (110 subjects, 1:1 Combo and EES): Mechanistic imaging observations to assess 1 year OCT evaluation of healthy intimal tissue coverage, intracoronary thrombosis, and stent malapposition, and QCA analysis to assess 1 year late loss. Combined with the 12 month imaging of Cohort A, this study will provide OCT and QCA observations at 1 year in 140 patients, half with Combo and half with EES.
    • Cohort C: 432 subjects (216 subjects per arm) will undergo all clinical follow-up assessments with FFR and angiographic assessments at 12 months. Cohort C will be the last cohort to enroll.
  • In the 110 subjects in Cohort B, 30 day and 1 year human antimurine antibody (HAMA) titers will also be collected.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

572

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Fukuoka
      • Fukoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan, 810-0001
        • Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital
      • Kurume-shi, Fukuoka, Japan, 830-0011
        • Kurume University Hospital
      • Kurume-shi, Fukuoka, Japan, 830-8577
        • Shinkoga Hospital
    • Hiroshima
      • Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan, 730-655
        • Tsuchiya General Hospital
    • Hokkaido
      • Hakodate-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 041-8680
        • Hakodate Municipal Hospital
      • Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 065-0033
        • Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital
    • Hyogo
      • Himeji-shi, Hyogo, Japan, 670-0981
        • Hyogo Brain and Heart Centre
      • Kobe-shi, Hyogo, Japan, 654-0026
        • Takahashi Hospital
      • Takarazukasi, Hyogo, Japan, 665-0873
        • Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital
    • Ibaraki
      • Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, Japan, 300-0053
        • Tsuchiura Kyodo Hospital
    • Ishikawa
      • Kanazawa-shi, Ishikawa, Japan, 920-0007
        • Kanazawa Cardiovascular Hospital
    • Kagoshima
      • Kagoshima-shi, Kagoshima, Japan, 892-0583
        • National Hospital Organisation Kagoshima Medical Centre
    • Kamakura City
      • Okamoto, Kamakura City, Japan, 247-8533
        • Shonan Kamakura General Hospital
    • Kanagawa
      • Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan, 211-8510
        • Kanto Rosai Hospital
      • Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan, 230-8765
        • Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital
    • Kyoto
      • Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan, 615-8256
        • Kyoto-Katsura Hospital
    • Miyazaki
      • Miyazaki-shi, Miyazaki, Japan, 880-0834
        • Miyazaki Medical Association Hospital
    • Okayama
      • Kurashiki-shi, Okayama, Japan, 710-8602
        • Kurashiki Central Hospital
      • Okayama-shi, Okayama, Japan, 700-0804
        • The Sakakibara Heart Institute of Okayama
    • Osaka
      • Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan, 530-0001
        • Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital
      • Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan, 530-0012
        • Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital
    • Saga
      • Saga-shi, Saga, Japan, 849-8501
        • Saga University Hospital
    • Saitama-ken
      • Kumagaya-shi, Saitama-ken, Japan, 360-0197
        • Saitama Prefectural Cardiovascular and Respiratory Disease Centre
    • Shizouka
      • Suntou-gun, Shizouka, Japan, 411-0904
        • Okamura memorial hospital
    • Tochigi
      • Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan, 329-0498
        • Jichi Medical University Hospital
    • Tokyo
      • Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 113-8421
        • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine
      • Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, Japan, 183-0003
        • Sakakibara Memorial Hospital
      • Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 173-8606
        • Teikyo University Hospital
      • Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 153-8515
        • Toho University Ohashi Hospital
      • Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 106-0031
        • The Cardiovascular Institute Hospital
      • Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 142-8666
        • Showa University Hospital
      • Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 162-8666
        • Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital
      • Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-8582
        • Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory, Keio University School of Medicine
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • MedStar Clinical Research Center
    • Florida
      • Lake Worth, Florida, United States, 33462
        • Atlantic Clinical Research Collaborative-Cardiology
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami
      • Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32308
        • Tallahassee Research Institute
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • Emory University Hospital Midtown
      • Gainesville, Georgia, United States, 30501
        • North Georgia Heart Foundation
    • Maine
      • Portland, Maine, United States, 04102
        • Maine Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Takoma Park, Maryland, United States, 20912
        • Washington Adventist Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Burlington, Massachusetts, United States, 01805
        • Lahey Clinic
    • Mississippi
      • Tupelo, Mississippi, United States, 38801
        • North Mississippi Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai Medical Center
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester Medical Center-Strong Memorial Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Medical Center
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States, 18103
        • Lehigh Valley Hospital
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

To be eligible for this trial, subjects must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Subject is able to verbally confirm understanding of risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives of Combo vs EES stent, and the subject or a legally authorized representative (LAR) must provide written informed consent before any study-related procedures are performed.
  2. Subject must be at least 20 years of age at the time of randomization.
  3. Subject must have clinical or functional evidence of myocardial ischemia (eg, stable or unstable angina, stabilized non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction confirmed by serum markers, ischemia by positive functional study, abnormal FFR, or a reversible change in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia).
  4. Subject must be acceptable candidate with anatomy suitable for PCI with a DES.
  5. Subject agrees to return for all study-related follow-up assessments, including invasive OCT follow-up assessment at 6 months (Cohort A) and at 1 year postprocedure (Cohorts A, B, and C).
  6. Subject is an acceptable candidate for Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.

    Angiographic Anatomy Criteria-

  7. Target lesions must be located in a native coronary artery with visually estimated diameter of 2.5 mm to 3.5 mm, inclusive, and up to 3 de novo target lesions may be treated, with a maximum of 2 de novo target lesions per epicardial vessel, with a maximum of 2 target vessels.
  8. Target lesions should be treatable with a single stent, and must measure 28 mm or less in length by visual estimation (2 mm or more of nondiseased tissue on either side of the target lesion should be covered by the study stent).
  9. If more than 1 target lesion will be treated, the reference vessel diameter and lesion length of each target lesion must meet the above criteria.
  10. Target lesions must be in a major artery or branch with a visually estimated stenosis of 50% or greater and less than 100% with a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow of 1 or greater.
  11. Previous percutaneous intervention of lesions in a target vessel (including side branches) is allowed if done 9 or more months before the study procedure and greater than 10 mm from the current target lesion.
  12. Nonstudy percutaneous interventions for lesions in a nontarget vessel are allowed if done 9 or more months before the study procedure, in the absence of documented ischemia or angiographic restenosis related to the vessel.

Exclusion Criteria

If a subject meets any of the following criteria, he or she may not be enrolled in the study:

  1. ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) at index presentation or within 7 days of study screening.
  2. Subject has current unstable arrhythmias or intractable angina with ECG changes or shock requiring pressors or mechanical assist device (intraaortic balloon pump, left ventricular assist device, Impella, etc.).
  3. Subject has known left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 30%.
  4. Subject has received a heart transplant or any other organ transplant or is on a waiting list for any organ transplant.
  5. Subject is receiving or scheduled to receive anticancer therapy for malignancy within 30 days before or after the procedure.
  6. Subject is receiving immunosuppression therapy, has known serious immunosuppressive disease (eg, human immunodeficiency virus), or has severe autoimmune disease that requires chronic immunosuppressive therapy (eg, systemic lupus erythematosus).
  7. Subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin; both heparin and bivalirudin; all available P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticlopidine, and ticagrelor); any everolimus, sirolimus, cobalt, chromium, nickel, tungsten, acrylic, or fluoro polymers; or hypersensitivity to contrast media that cannot be adequately premedicated.
  8. Subject has previously received murine therapeutic antibodies and exhibited sensitization through the production of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMAs).
  9. Subject has elective surgery planned within the first 12 months after the procedure that will require interruption or discontinuation of planned Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT).
  10. Subject has known platelet count less than 100,000 cells/mm3 or greater than 700,000 cells/mm3, a white blood cell count of less than 3000 cells/mm3, or documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis).
  11. Subject has known renal insufficiency (eg, serum creatinine level of greater than 2.5 mg/dL or subject is on dialysis).
  12. Subject has history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions.
  13. Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic neurological attack within the past 6 months.
  14. Subject has had a significant gastrointestinal or urinary bleed within the past 6 months.
  15. Subject has known extensive peripheral vascular disease that precludes safe 6 French sheath insertion.
  16. Known other medical illness (eg, cancer, chronic infectious disease, severe vascular disease, or congestive heart failure) or known history of substance abuse (alcohol, cocaine, heroin, etc.) that may cause noncompliance with the protocol, confound the data interpretation, or is associated with a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
  17. Currently participating in another clinical study that has not yet reached its primary endpoint.
  18. Currently pregnant or breast-feeding or is planning pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days before the index procedure.

    Angiographic Exclusion Criteria-

    If the target lesion meets any of the following criteria, the subject may not be enrolled in the study:

  19. Unprotected left main coronary artery location.
  20. Unprotected ostial (located within 2 mm of the origin) left anterior descending artery or left circumflex.
  21. Located within an arterial or saphenous vein graft or graft anastomosis, distal to a diseased arterial or saphenous vein graft (visually estimated graft diameter stenosis greater than 40%).
  22. Involves a bifurcation in which the side branch is 2 mm or greater in diameter AND would be covered by the planned stent.
  23. Involves a side branch requiring predilation.
  24. Total occlusion (TIMI flow 0) before wire crossing.
  25. Extreme tortuosity proximal to or within the lesion.
  26. Extreme angulation (90º or greater) proximal to or within the lesion.
  27. Heavy calcification, defined as multiple persisting opacifications of the coronary wall visible in more than one projection surrounding the complete lumen of the coronary artery at the site of the lesion.
  28. Restenotic vessel from previous intervention.
  29. Received brachytherapy in any epicardial vessel (including side branches).
  30. Target vessel contains angiographically visible thrombus.
  31. Serial lesions or diffuse disease with high probability of bailout requiring 3 or more stents in a single vessel, more than 5 stents per subject, or more than 2 vessels.
  32. Target or nontarget vessel lesion (including all side branches) is present with a high probability of requiring PCI within 12 months after the index procedure.
  33. Stent overlapping is a planned treatment of the target lesion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combo
The Combo Stent is composed of the OrbusNeich R stent™, with an abluminal coating of a bioabsorbable polymer matrix formulated with sirolimus for sustained release, and an anti-CD34 antibody cell capture coating on the luminal surface.
The Combo Stent is composed of the OrbusNeich R stent™, with an abluminal coating of a bioabsorbable polymer matrix formulated with sirolimus for sustained release, and an anti-CD34 antibody cell capture coating on the luminal surface.
Active Comparator: Everolimus Eluting Stent (EES)
Everolimus Eluting Stent (EES) (Xience V, Xience Prime, Xience Xpedition stents, Abbott Vascular/Abbott Vascular Japan). Xience Prime inherited the clinical result of Xience V and is a product that obtains efficiency essentially equal to Xience V.
Everolimus Eluting Stent (EES) (Xience V, Xience Prime, Xience Xpedition stents, Abbott Vascular/Abbott Vascular Japan). Xience Prime inherited the clinical result of Xience V and is a product that obtains efficiency essentially equal to Xience V.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 1 year follow-up
The primary clinical endpoint of Target Vessel Failure (TVF), defined as cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven Target Vessel Revascularization(TVR) by percutaneous or surgical methods, at 1 year.
1 year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Healthy Tissue Coverage That Was Greater Than 40 Micrometers
Time Frame: 1 year
The secondary efficacy endpoint is mechanistic Optical coherence tomography (OCT) healthy level of intimal tissue coverage, determined by the OCT core laboratory at 1 year for subjects in Cohorts A and B. This reports the percentage of healthy tissue coverage that was great than 40 micrometers.
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients With Clinically and Functionally Ischemia-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinically and functionally ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), including use of target-vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), analyzed dichotomously using the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) vs. Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study criteria of 0.8 during a 2 minute infusion of adenosine or adenosine triphosphate.34 Abnormal FFR-driven interventions at 1 year will be included in the evaluation of ischemia-driven TLR.
1 year
Number of Patients Exhibiting Human Antimurine Antibody (HAMA) Reaction
Time Frame: Day of device implantation, 30 days, 12 months
Serum will be assessed for HAMA development at index, 30 days, and 12 months in Cohort B subjects. Human antimurine antibody plasma assessment will be with blood draws performed during index procedure, 30 day follow-up visit, and 1 year catheterizations.
Day of device implantation, 30 days, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mitchell W Krucoff, MD, Duke Clinical Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Arteriosclerosis

Clinical Trials on OrbusNeich Combo stent™

3
Subscribe