Development of General Practitioners Screening Tool of Frail Older Old Community (ReperAge)

December 19, 2016 updated by: Gerontopôle des Pays de la Loire

Development of General Practitioners Screening Tool of Frail Older Old Community-dwellers: a Cohort Population-based Study

The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional, interdisciplinary diagnostic process to determine the medical, psychological, and functional capabilities of an elderly person, in order to develop a coordinated and integrated plan for treatment. It represents the first stage of the most appropriate care for elderly people who are frail or who cannot perform at least three daily tasks unaided.

It has been shown that the integration of CGA in the decision-making and care management at hospital improves inpatient's health and functional status, and reduces mortality rate and healthcare expenditures. The effects of CGA in daily practice of general practitioners remain unknown.

Implementation of a systematic CGA for every older old community-dwellers performed by a general practitioner remains yet difficult because of number of issues. First, although the number of older old community-dwellers keeps increasing, the number of health care professional with geriatric skills does not. Second, CGA is a complex and time-consuming process. Third, CGA requires a multidisciplinary geriatric team that cannot support alone the care of all frail older old community-dwellers due to their limited number. An implication of non-geriatricians in CGA is therefore required.

Recently, it was confirmed that CGA cannot be applied to all older adults, and that the best compromise could be the use of a two-step approach. The first step is the identification by non-geriatricians of elderly inpatients at high risk of adverse outcomes using a screening tool, and the second step is a CGA by geriatricians with a diagnosis purpose.

None of existing tools used for screening is adapted to the population of elderly people who visit general practitioners.Thus, healthcare professionals working in ED need a simple, standardized and brief geriatric assessment (BGA) to identify as soon as possible frail older old community-dwellers requiring specialized geriatric care.

The investigators hypothesized that a BGA older old community-dwellers carried out by a general practitioner could predict the adverse health events (i.e. hospitalization, institutionalisation, medical consultations and death) occurring during a 6-months follow-up period before the evaluation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

840

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leers, France, 59115
        • Nord Pas de Calais

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

80 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

adults aged 80 and over

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Eligible patients are those who meet the following inclusion criteria:

  • the patient is aged 80 or more,
  • the patient comes to a normal medical consultation without any acute health problem,
  • the patient lives at home,
  • the patient is able to respond to questions he is asked,
  • the patient has given his agreement to answer questions during the initial consultation, to answer further questions by telephone after 3 months and to return in 6 months for a further consultation,
  • the life expectancy of the patient as estimated by the primary care practitioner is greater than 6 months.
  • the patient has french nationality and is a member of a national Social Security scheme.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients are ineligible if :

  • one inclusion criteria is not met,
  • if a close relation of the patient does not agree the patient to be part of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Seniors

The study will be based on a 6-months assessment period, with two consecutive monitoring visits on enrollment.

Patient follow-up after 3 months will be conducted by telephone and monitoring after 6 months will be carried out as part of a routine consultation.

Each subject will have a BGA (Brief Geriatric assesment).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of non planned hospitalization by subjects
Time Frame: Hospitalization between inclusion and follow up to 6 months

The BGA test will include the following criteria:

  • age,
  • sex,
  • the ability to give the current month and year,
  • the occurrence of falls during the last 6 months,
  • the presence of more than 4 classes of prescribed drugs,
  • the presence of professional or other assistance help at home.

All following adverse health events occurring during a 6-months period of follow-up :

  • Hospitalization,
  • Institutionalisation,
  • Medical consultations,
  • Death.
Hospitalization between inclusion and follow up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of subjects' institutionnalized
Time Frame: Institutionnalization between inclusion and follow up at 3 or 6 months
Institutionnalization between inclusion and follow up at 3 or 6 months
Number of dead subjects
Time Frame: Death between inclusion and follow up at 3 or 6 months
Death between inclusion and follow up at 3 or 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of non planned consultations by subjects
Time Frame: Number of non planned consultations between inclusion and follow up at 3 or 6 months
Number of non planned consultations between inclusion and follow up at 3 or 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gilles Berrut, PhD, CHU Nantes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 20, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Reperage - 23

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

3
Subscribe