The Effect of Identification Badge on Situation Awareness During High Fidelity Simulation

December 1, 2014 updated by: Issam Tanoubi, Université de Montréal
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of identification badge (role and place) during high-fidelity simulation as an impact on situation awareness.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

High-fidelity simulation is well recognized as an educational tool. Mr. Issenberg completed a review(2005) that determined features of high-fidelity simulation training that lead to effective learning. It this review, it is mentioned that the validity of the simulator (realism) is essential to help learners to increase their skills and sharpen their responses. It is essential to get and maintain engagement during high-fidelity simulation and it pass by an increase in realism and situation awareness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of identification badge (physical and conceptual realism) during high-fidelity simulation as an impact on situation awareness and engagement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1J4
        • CAAHC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • anesthesiology residents (university of montreal) who participate to simulation course on crisis resources management

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Scenario C (control)
no badge
Active Comparator: Scenario B (badge)
Use of Identification badge during scenarios (roles and places)
Other: Use of identification badge during scenarios

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Situation awareness
Time Frame: 2 days

Subjects answer a 4 questions survey on situation awareness with 7 answers choices (1-strongly disagree... 7-strongly agree)

  1. I know where I was in the beginning of the scenario
  2. I know where I was during the scenario
  3. I know the role of each participant in the beginning of the scenario
  4. I Know the role of each participant during the scenario
2 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject's engagement in high-fidelity simulation
Time Frame: 2 days

Subject answer a 2 questions survey on engagement with a 7 answers choices (1- strongly disagree...7-strongly agree)

  1. I felt emotionally concerned during the scenario
  2. The scenario was enough realistic to get engaged in the clinical situation
2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Université de Montréal

Collaborators

Centre d'apprentissage des attitudes et des habiletés cliniques (CAAHC)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marie-Eve Belanger, MD, Université de Montréal

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MEB-2014

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patient Simulation

Clinical Trials on Use of identification badge during scenarios

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Cambodia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe