Prospective Post-market Evaluation of an Echogenic Catheter (EchoCath)

May 18, 2015 updated by: Smiths Medical, ASD, Inc.

Prospective Post-market Evaluation of an Echogenic Catheter Used in a Peripheral Nerve Block Procedure

Patients scheduled for mastectomy and suitable for paravertebral block will be randomized to one of 2 groups.

Group 1 will have the nerve block performed using a standard non-echogenic needle and catheter under ultrasound guidance. Group 2 will have the block performed using the control needle and an echogenic catheter, all under ultrasound (US) guidance.

The clinician will be blinded to the catheter type and will assess the quality of catheter visualisation of the US image during the procedure, along with adequacy of spread of local anesthetic. The primary outcome will be needle visibility, and secondary outcomes will be block success rate and block quality. An assessment of the patient's pain levels after the procedure will also be conducted.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, NW14 5BU
        • Recruiting
        • University College Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled to undergo breast surgery requiring use of a peripheral nerve block catheter for establishing a paravertebral block
  • Patients classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I, II or III
  • Patients at least 18 years old
  • Patient is willing and able to provide informed consent for study participation
  • Patient has a good understanding of written and verbal English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with contraindications to regional anesthesia technique (e.g. allergy to local anesthetic or other medications used in study)
  • Patient with known coagulopathy
  • Patient whose target nerve cannot be seen with linear ultrasound probe in a pre-procedure scan. All patients who need a curvilinear probe to visualize the target nerve will be excluded from the study.
  • Patients having mastectomy and immediate reconstruction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EchoGlo™ Peripheral Nerve Block Catheter
Echogenic nerve block catheter (test)
Catheter used for a paravertebral anesthesia block
Other Names:
  • EchoGlo™ Peripheral Nerve Block Catheter
Active Comparator: Pajunk® EpiLong Catheter
Non-echogenic nerve block catheter (control)
Nerve Block Catheter
Other Names:
  • Pajunk® EpiLong Catheter

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visibility of entire catheter length
Time Frame: Day 1, time of procedure
Demonstrate superior ultrasound visibility of the entire length of the test catheter compared to the control, as graded by a blinded investigator
Day 1, time of procedure
Visibility of catheter tip
Time Frame: Day 1, time of procedure
Demonstrate superior ultrasound visibility of the test catheter tip compared to the control, as graded by a blinded investigator
Day 1, time of procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of the block
Time Frame: Day 1, time of procedure
Mean rating of block quality as assessed by the clinician on a 4 point scale per treatment group
Day 1, time of procedure
Block failure rate
Time Frame: Day 1, time of procedure
Number of failed blocks per treatment group
Day 1, time of procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Peter R Kratz, MS, Smiths Medical

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 19, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Nerve Block Procedure

Clinical Trials on EchoGlo Nerve Block Catheter

3
Subscribe