The Permacol Dutch Cohort Study

April 5, 2017 updated by: Ruth Kaufmann, MD, Erasmus Medical Center

Incisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication in surgery causing much morbidity and even mortality in patients. Despite studies on the optimal closing technique for laparotomies, the risk for incisional hernia after midline incision remains about 5-20 %. It has been established that implementing a mesh reduces recurrence of the incisional hernia but still the results of repair are often disappointing. Incisional hernias can become increasingly complex due to complicated abdominal wall defects caused by a disturbed anatomy, fistulas, burst abdomen, wound and mesh infections. In these cases it is not save to repair the incisional hernia by means of a synthetic mesh and other augmentation tools need to be implemented.

In the recent years the use of biological meshes has been gaining popularity. Recent reports of the use of collagen-based prosthesis have suggested that they support new vessel growth, do not excite a significant foreign body reaction, form fewer adhesions, are well incorporated into host tissues with minimal wound contraction, and can be used in grossly contaminated wounds with fewer infective complications. Biologic meshes are harvested from a source tissue and processed for medical use but they vary widely in their processing methods. They include tissues of human or animal origins, both chemically cross-linked and non cross-linked processes, and submucosal, pericardial, or dermal tissue sources. Current studies investigating the effectiveness of these meshes are small and have short periods of follow-up. These shortcomings can be explained to high cost of the meshes and unclear indication when to use a biological mesh.

The aim of this study is investigate the short and long term effects of the Permacol© biological mesh. Also the investigators will be inquiring why a biologic mesh was used, what is the true indication to use a biological mesh.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amersfoort, Netherlands
        • Meander MC
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
      • Arnhem, Netherlands
        • Rijnstate
      • Bergen op Zoom, Netherlands
        • Lievensberg
      • Breda, Netherlands
        • Amphia
      • Delft, Netherlands
        • Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis
      • Den Haag, Netherlands
        • MC Haaglanden
      • Drachten, Netherlands
        • Nij Smellinghe
      • Eindhoven, Netherlands
        • Catharina
      • Gouda, Netherlands
        • Groene Hart
      • Groningen, Netherlands
        • UMC Groningen
      • Heerlen, Netherlands
        • Atrium MC
      • Hilversum, Netherlands
        • Tergooi ziekenhuizen
      • Hoofddorp, Netherlands
        • Spaarne Ziekenhuis
      • Leeuwarden, Netherlands
        • MC Leeuwarden
      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • MUMC+
      • Purmerend, Netherlands
        • Waterland
      • Roosendaal, Netherlands
        • Franciscus
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Erasmus University Medical Center
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Havenziekenhuis
      • Sittard, Netherlands
        • Orbis MC
      • Tilburg, Netherlands
        • TweeSteden
      • Utrecht, Netherlands
        • UMC Utrecht
      • Venlo, Netherlands
        • VieCuri

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The design of the trial will be a cross sectional cohort study. We will be gathering information from all the centers in the Netherlands who have used the Permacol© mesh in the past to treat complicated abdominal wall defects. Patients will be asked to return to the hospitals outpatient clinic. A total of around 70 patients will be included into the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent
  • Complicated abdominal wall hernia repair
  • Permacol© mesh implantation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No signed informed consent
  • Operation other than Complicated abdominal wall hernia repair
  • Implant other than Permacol© mesh implantation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Permacol mesh placement
No intervention performed
All patients were treated for a complex abdominal wall hernia by implantation of Permacol mesh. This intervention took place before patients were included in the cohort.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incisional Hernia recurrence
Time Frame: One and two year after initial operation
This parameter will be assessed by taking a history of the patient and assessing operation room reports.
One and two year after initial operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mesh explantations
Time Frame: Anytime after abdominal wall reconstruction with Permacol until two years after operation
This parameter will be assessed by taking a history of the patient and assessing operation room reports.
Anytime after abdominal wall reconstruction with Permacol until two years after operation
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: All postoperative complications are assessed until two years after initial operation
This parameter will be assessed by taking a history of the patient and assessing patient reports and operation room reports.
All postoperative complications are assessed until two years after initial operation
Additional "abdominal wall repair" operations
Time Frame: After initial abdominal wall reconstruction with Permacol until two years after initial operation
This parameter will be assessed by taking a history of the patient and assessing patient reports and operation room reports.
After initial abdominal wall reconstruction with Permacol until two years after initial operation
Indication of Permacol usage
Time Frame: Perioperatively
The indication for usage of Permacol was noted just before or just after operation.
Perioperatively
Quality of Life
Time Frame: A year or longer after initial abdominal wall reconstruction until two years after initial operation
This parameter will be assessed various questionnaires (ShortForm-36, EuroQOL (EQ-5D-5L), and Body Image Questionnaire).
A year or longer after initial abdominal wall reconstruction until two years after initial operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 18, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Permacol Dutch Cohort Study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hernia of Abdominal Wall

Clinical Trials on Permacol mesh placement

3
Subscribe