Upper Extremity Dysfunction Post Radial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

July 29, 2014 updated by: Anna Koopman, Albert Schweitzer Hospital

Upper Extremity Dysfunction Post Radial PCI: A Cohort Study Evaluating Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the Radial Artery as Access Route

Trans-Radial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (TR-PCI) is rapidly becoming the gold standard. This is especially the case in primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI), where most benefits of the radial approach, such as reduced major bleeding and mortality, can be expected. However there is very limited research available looking at the consequences of trans-radial access for upper extremity function.

The main objective of this study is to provide insight in the morbidity with regards to the upper extremity surrounding the radial access route in percutaneous coronary interventions. Secondary objectives are to provide insight in the consequences for functional status, factors influencing and financial costs of this morbidity, to identify subject who might benefit from early referral and treatment of this morbidity and to generate hypotheses for further clinical research into this matter.

The investigators hypothesis is that approximately 20% of the population will experience upper extremity dysfunction after TR-PCI.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zuid-Holland
      • Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 3318 AT
        • Recruiting
        • Albert Schweitzer Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sander IJsselmuiden, MD, PHD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Carlo Holtzer, MD, PHD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Roos Koopman, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presenting for TR-PCI at the study centre.
  • The radial artery can be palpated and Doppler ultrasound examination of the radial artery shows non-occlusive flow.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently enrolled in another study that clinically interferes with this study and that has not passed the primary endpoint.
  • The clinical condition prohibits or hinders informed consent and/or baseline examinations. E.g. cardiogenic shock and cardiopulmonary resuscitation or subconscious and semiconscious state,.
  • Co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the subject's ability to participate in the study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific integrity of the study, e.g. loss of voluntary motor control of the studied extremities.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Trans-Radial PCI
Other Names:
  • Dotter-Procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A binary score of upper extremity dysfunction
Time Frame: 2 weeks

A positive score is defined as the presence of at least a ≥1 point increase in the Levine-Katz (Boston) questionnaire; or at least 2 of the following decreased scores compared to baseline, 2 weeks after TR-PCI:

  • ≥15% decrease in the DASH-outcome measure.
  • Increase in VAS pain score with regard to the upper extremity of ≥2 points
  • Absent signal of the radial artery using Doppler

    • 10% decrease in goniometry of the upper extremity, with a minimum decrease of 10 degree Strength
    • 60N decrease in palmar grip strength
    • 12N decrease in pinch grip strength
    • 15% decrease in isometric strength of the following manoeuvres:

      • Flexion and extension of the elbow and/or wrist
  • Sensibility loss of ≥1 filament of the hand using Semmes-Weinstein filaments according to WEST

    • 1cm increase at volumetry of the hand, using the Figure of 8-method
    • 1cm increase at volumetry of the forearm, measured circumferentially 8 cm distal of the medial epicondyle
  • Compartment syndrome
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful arterial access
Time Frame: During procedure
Successful arterial access of the target radial artery, defined as the ability to successfully advance a guiding catheter and position it in the coronary ostium.
During procedure
Cross-over
Time Frame: During procedure
Percentage of cross-over from radial to femoral access
During procedure
Anomaly
Time Frame: During procedure
Presence of branching anomaly (high radial artery take-off), tortuosity (none, mild, moderate or severe), stenosis (not encountered or percentage of stenosis encountered) and/or spasm (none, mild, moderate or severe) of the radial artery
During procedure
Access route complications
Time Frame: 6 months
Access route complications, dissection or perforation of radial, brachial or subclavian artery, as evidenced by angiography or computed tomography
6 months
Procedural success
Time Frame: During procedure
Procedural success (defined as <30% residual stenosis at the end of the procedure)
During procedure
Catheter performance
Time Frame: During procedure
Overall catheter performance ranging from 0 (very bad) - 5 (very good)
During procedure
Procedure time
Time Frame: During procedure
Procedure time in minutes, from guide catheter insertion to withdrawal
During procedure
Radiation
Time Frame: During procedure
Radiation time and dose, in minutes and mGy
During procedure
MACCE
Time Frame: 6 months

Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as:

  • Myocardial infarction (MI), according to the Third Universal definition of Myocardial Infarction
  • Target vessel revascularisation, either by PCI or surgical
  • Death
  • Cerebrovascular accident (CVA)
6 months
Bleeding
Time Frame: 6 months
Bleeding events (according to Academic Research Consortium definitions) at procedure and at each consecutive follow-up
6 months
DASH
Time Frame: 6 months
"Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand" (DASH) outcome measured at two weeks, one and six months
6 months
VAS
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual Analogue Scale pain score (VAS) with regard to the upper extremity at one day, two weeks, one and six months.
6 months
Occlusion
Time Frame: 6 months
Presence or absence of arterial pulse when evaluating the radial artery using Doppler ultrasound examination extremity at one day, two weeks, one and six months
6 months
AROM
Time Frame: 6 months
Active Range Of Motion (AROM) goniometry values in degrees of the upper extremity at two weeks, one and six months.
6 months
Strength
Time Frame: 6 months

o Strength in Newton at two weeks, one and six months:

  • Palmar grip strength
  • Pinch grip strength
  • Isometric strength of the following manoeuvres:

    • Flexion and extension of the elbow
    • Flexion and extension of the wrist
6 months
Sensibility
Time Frame: 6 months
Sensibility of the hand using Semmes-Weinstein filaments according to WEST at two weeks, one and six months.
6 months
Volumetry of the hand
Time Frame: 6 months
Volumetry of the hand in centimeters using the Figure of eight-method extremity at one day, two weeks, one and six months.
6 months
Volumetry of the forearm
Time Frame: 6 months
Volumetry of the forearm in centimetres at one day, two weeks, one and six months.
6 months
Levine-Katz (Boston) questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
Symptom-severity score and the functional-status score of the Levine-Katz (Boston) questionnaire at two weeks, one and six months
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hand centre
Time Frame: After reaching primary endpoint

o If the primary endpoint has been reached:

  • Diagnostic procedures performed at the hand centre
  • Diagnosis of the hand centre
  • Performed treatment at the hand centre
  • Upper extremity related absence of work in days
After reaching primary endpoint

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL45613.101.13

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Upper Extremity Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Trans-Radial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (TR-PCI)

3
Subscribe