- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02226562
Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of a Mouthwash in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity
July 26, 2018 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline
A Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of a Mouthwash in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity
The aim of this study is to investigate the longitudinal efficacy of a potassium nitrate mouthwash formulation when used as an adjunct to brushing with a standard fluoride dentifrice for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) compared to brushing with a standard fluoride dentifrice alone.
This will be a single centre, eight week, randomised, examiner blind, two treatment arm, parallel design, stratified (by maximum baseline Schiff Sensitivity Score of the two selected test teeth) study in participants with at least two sensitive teeth that meet all the criteria at the Screening and Baseline visit.
Participants will be assessed at Baseline, and at four and eight weeks to monitor clinical efficacy and safety.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
191
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46825
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 55 years (ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants in good general health, with self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity lasting more than 6 months but not more than 10 years.
- Participants with minimum of 20 natural teeth.
At screening, a minimum of four, non-adjacent teeth.
- Teeth showing signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion.
- Teeth with Gingival Index score ≤1 and a clinical mobility of ≤1.
- Teeth that are determined to be sensitive by the participant following a 1 second air blast to the cervical margin.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of chronic debilitating disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect study outcomes.
- Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, causes dry mouth.
- Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay in 12 months of screening.
- In the 8 weeks prior to screening use of an oral care product indicated for the relief of DH.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride
3.0% weight by weight (w/w) potassium nitrate mouthwash with 0.02% sodium fluoride
|
3.0% w/w potassium nitrate mouthwash with 0.02% sodium fluoride
|
Other: Standard fluoride dentifrice
Standard fluoride dentifrice containing 1000 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP)
|
Standard fluoride dentifrice containing 1000 ppm fluoride as SMFP
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline to 8 week
|
The examiner indicated the participant's response to an evaporaitve air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus.
A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score is indicative of an imrpovement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline to 8 week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline to 4 week
|
The examiner indicated the participant's response to an evaporaitve air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus.
A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score is indicative of an imrpovement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline to 4 week
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline to 8 week
|
The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached.
The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort.
The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold.
The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.
At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.
|
Baseline to 8 week
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline to 4 week
|
The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached.
The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort.
The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold.
The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.
At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.
|
Baseline to 4 week
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale (VRS) at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline to 8 week
|
Participants rated the intensity of their response to an evaporative air stimulus using a 10 point VRS scale with 1 indicating 'no pain' and 10 indicating 'Intense pain'.
A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline to 8 week
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VRS at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline to 4 week
|
Participants rated the intensity of their response to an evaporative air stimulus using a 10 point VRS scale with 1 indicating 'no pain' and 10 indicating 'Intense pain'.
A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline to 4 week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 2, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
December 5, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 25, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
August 27, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 27, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 26, 2018
Last Verified
July 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202196
- RH02492 (Other Identifier: GSK)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dentin Sensitivity
-
Minia UniversityCompleted
-
Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, PakistanRecruitingSensitivity, ToothPakistan
-
University of PaviaEnrolling by invitation
-
King Khalid UniversityCompleted
-
Universidad del DesarrolloFlorencia PachecoUnknown
-
Federal University of UberlandiaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.; Fundação de Amparo...UnknownDentin Sensitivity | Dentin Hypersensitivity | Dentine Hypersensitivity | Hypersensitivity DentinBrazil
-
Federal University of UberlandiaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.; Fundação de Amparo...UnknownDentin Sensitivity | Dentin Hypersensitivity | Dentine Hypersensitivity | Hypersensitivity DentinBrazil
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownDentin Hypersensitivity | Dentin Desensitizing Agents
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
Liaquat University of Medical & Health SciencesRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
Universidade Federal do AmazonasCompleted
-
Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products...CompletedDentin SensitivityUnited States
-
HALEONCompletedDentin SensitivityUnited States
-
Frank MoseHerning HospitalCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedDental Erosion | Acid WearUnited States
-
University of ChileUnknownDentin SensitivityChile
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
-
University of PennsylvaniaNorthwestern UniversityCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedDentine HypersensitivityUnited States