A Comparison of Immediate Treatment of CIN1 With Cryotherapy and 12 Month Cytology Follow up in HIV Seropositive Women

December 1, 2015 updated by: Cynthia S Firnhaber, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa

A Comparison of Immediate Treatment of CIN1 With Cryotherapy and Regular 12 Month Cytology Follow up in HIV Seropositive Women

Based on the high incidence of cervical cancer and high grade dysplasia and increased progression and incomplete treatment of CIN2 and 3 in South Africa, we propose to study the effect of cryotherapy among HIV-positive women diagnosed with CIN 1 versus regular 12 month cytology follow-up. This study will be a dual-arm, open-label, randomized clinical trial for HIV-infected women diagnosed with CIN 1 and receiving care at the Themba Lethu Clinic, Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa. CIN 1 will be identified from patients who have had a colposcopic biopsy for persistent LSIL as per standard of care.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Women with HIV have a higher risk of cervical cancer. Screening and treatment formaly of the disease is limited die to poor access of screening programs and multiple visits. Women with HIV also have high progressions rates of disease amd my need to be treated earliers. Cryotherapy is a low option and very easy to implement especially in low resource provinces.

  • It is cheaper and easier to administer than Large Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LLETZ)
  • No histology or transportation costs of specimens
  • Less invasive than LLETZ
  • It is nurse driven and easily learned
  • It decreases loss to follow-up of patients due to reduced waiting time, transportation costs, time off work and HIV stigma

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

480

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Johannesburg, South Africa
        • University of Witwatersrand/Helen Joseph Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV -infected women whose biopsy proves CIN1 and who consent to study participants and procedures
  • CIN1 with no visible lesion
  • The entire ectocervical lesion should cover less than 75% of the cervix and not more than 2 - 3mm into the endocervical canal

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Known and previous treatment for HSIL by any method (Cryotherapy, LEEP or cone biopsy)
  • Women who are menstruating or who have active pelvic inflammatory disease will be deferred from the study until the infection is cleared or the menstrual cycle has ended; the patient may then participate in the study.
  • Unsatisfactory colposcopic examination defined as inability to see the extent of the lesion in the endocervical canal and lesions deemed ineligible for cryotherapy by an OB/GYN specialist.
  • Previous hysterectomy with removal of the cervix

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
Immediate treatment with Cryotherapy and 12 month cytology and histology follow-up
cryotherapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV infected women vs control arm of standard of care (repeat pap smear in 1 year)
No Intervention: Arm 2
12 month cytology and histology follow-up

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Regresson of CIN1 to a normal biopsy
Time Frame: 12 month
Treatment failure is the progression of CIN1 to CIN2
12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cynthia S Firnhaber, MD, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 26, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 3, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Dysplasia

Clinical Trials on cryotherapy

3
Subscribe