Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Patient Positioning in EOS System®

December 21, 2016 updated by: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Patients' Arm Positioning in the EOS® Stereoradiography System: Study the Sagittal Spinal Parameters and Postural Balance in EOS® Full Spine X-rays in Scoliosis

The EOS® imaging system, a new imaging modality which offers low dose, weight bearing and full body X-ray imaging, requires a new standing position where patients put their hands and forearms on the wall vertically for stability. Although this method provides enough support for the patients during the extended X-ray acquisition time, its impact on the postural balance and sagittal profile of the spine and sacro-pelvic parameters has not been evaluated. The goal of this study is to identify the impact of patients' arm positioning on the sagittal profile and postural balance of the patient and subsequently propose a standardized method for full spine X-ray acquisition in the EOS® imaging system.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Spino-pelvic sagittal analysis and postural assessment are important parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treatment and surgical planning.The three-dimensional (3D) shape of the spine is impacted by the patients' posture particularly in adolescents with flexible spinal curves. The latter highlights the importance of the patients' positioning during X-ray acquisition in order to avoid any misleading measurements that may adversely impact monitoring and surgical curve correction in AIS.

Participating subjects will undergo two bi-planar X-rays in different positions. The positions will be instructed by the means of graphical presentation and verbal explanation by the radiology technician. The first standing position in the EOS® imaging system for full spinal X-ray acquisition will consist of putting both hands and forearms in front of the subject on the wall vertically. In the second position, knuckles are loosely placed on ipsi-lateral clavicles. Bi-planar X-rays will be taken in the EOS® imaging system for both positions.

Moreover to compare the postural balance of the patient in the two described positions, a pressure mat will be placed in the EOS® system. The pressure mat will be calibrated with the EOS® system and permits to identify the position of the center of pressure (COP) with respect to the anatomical landmarks. The magnitude of pressure under the patients' feet will be measured during each X-ray and compared.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Outpatient adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients visiting the orthopedic clinic at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia who require bi-plannar full spine x-ray imaging for clinical purposes.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects age 10-18
  • Diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
  • Prescribed bi-planar full spine X-ray images
  • Must be able to stand still for 10 seconds without any support
  • Must be able to follow verbal and visual instruction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgical treatment
  • Diagnosis of a neuro-muscular disorder
  • Have supernumerary vertebrae, congenital deformities, spondylolisthesis, or spina bifida
  • Have any other musculoskeletal disorder that impacts standing balance such as hip, knee, ankle pain and instability or lower back pain
  • BMI higher than 30
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Parents/guardians or subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, may be non-compliant with study schedules or procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Subject Cohort
Two bi-planar full spinal X-rays will be taken using the EOS® imaging system with subjects standing in two different positions. The first x-ray will be taken while the subject's hands and forearms in front of them on the wall vertically. A second image will be taken while the subject's knuckles loosely placed on ipsi-lateral clavicles. A pressure mat will record the magnitude of pressure under the subjects' feet during each set of images. A third set of pressure mat recordings will be obtained while the subject is in a natural standing position with both arms hanging on either side (no x-ray images will be taking in this position).
The EOS® imaging system is a low dose, 3-dimensional imaging system that provides weight bearing images which provide visual information with respect to the interaction between the joints and the rest of the musculoskeletal system, particularly the spine, hips and legs. The imaging system is used for clinical purposes with additional images captured as part of this study to collect data from subjects in two different arm positions during imaging.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Spinal Sagittal Plane Parameters
Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes
Spinal (coronal and sagittal) and sacro-pelvic parameters were used to evaluate the equivalence between the spinal and pelvic parameters in the two arm positions.
Up to 30 minutes
Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Frontal Spinal Plane Parameters
Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes
Spinal (coronal and sagittal) and sacro-pelvic parameters were used to evaluate the equivalence between the spinal and pelvic parameters in the two arm positions.
Up to 30 minutes
Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Transverse Plane Parameters
Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes
Spinal (coronal and sagittal) and sacro-pelvic parameters were used to evaluate the equivalence between the spinal and pelvic parameters in the two arm positions.
Up to 30 minutes
Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Pelvic Sagittal Plane Parameters
Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes
Spinal (coronal and sagittal) and sacro-pelvic parameters were used to evaluate the equivalence between the spinal and pelvic parameters in the two arm positions.
Up to 30 minutes
Impact of the Patients' Arm Positioning on Clinical Evaluation of Bi-planar Spinal X-rays Using the EOS System - Pressure Mat Parameters
Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes
Spinal (coronal and sagittal) and sacro-pelvic parameters were used to evaluate the equivalence between the spinal and pelvic parameters in the two arm positions. Images were only recorded during the wall and clavicle position, not during the natural standing position. Pressure mat parameters were recorded for both arm positions and compared to the natural standing position (arms hanging on either side).
Up to 30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Saba Pasha, PhD, Children's Surgical Associates

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14-011016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Identifiable pressure mat data from select subjects that is recorded during this study will be shared with investigators at this institution working on another approved study which requires pre-surgical pressure mat data. Many subjects in the companion study will have already undergone surgery, yet none in the current study will have at the time pressure mat data is recorded. Thus this data will be shared. Data will be stored in a password protected file on a secure shared drive and is only accessible by IRB-approved members of the current and companion study teams.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Clinical Trials on EOS® imaging system

3
Subscribe