The Clinical Efficacy of DFPP in Patients With AAGN

February 2, 2018 updated by: Zhi-Hong Liu, M.D.

A Prospective, Controlled Study of Double Filtration Plasmapheresis (DFPP) in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody Associated Glomerulonephritis (AAGN)

The clinical efficacy of double filtration plasmapheresis(DFPP) in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody associated glomerulonephritis(AAGN).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a single center, prospective, randomized,controlled study to compare the clinical efficacy of double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) combined with intravenous cyclophosphamide (IV-CTX) pulse therapy versus IV-CTX pulse therapy in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody associated glomerulonephritis(AAGN).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210002
        • Research Institute of Nephrology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a diagnosis of ANCA associated vasculitis(AAV), using criteria adapted from the disease definitions of the Chapel Hill consensus conference
  • serum positive ANCA and the ANCA level ≥100 relative unit/ml
  • with renal involvement and serum creatinine≥3 mg/dl
  • written informed consent had been provided.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other secondary vasculitis
  • anti-glomerular basement membrane(GBM) positive
  • severe infection; hepatitis B antigenemia, anti- hepatitis C virus
  • immunodeficiency; or immunoglobulin G(IgG)<2g/l
  • life threatening
  • renal biopsy show globally sclerotic glomeruli>60% and normal glomeruli<10%
  • need renal replacement therapy for more than 4w
  • received large dose of methylprednisolone(MP),CTX,mycophenolate mofetil(MMF), plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin(IVIg) therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DFPP&CTX
double filtration plasmapheresis(DFPP) combined with intravenous cyclophosphamide (IV-CTX) pulse therapy in addition(DFPP&CTX)

First,patients received methylprednisolone pulse therapy followed by oral prednisone and intravenous cyclophosphamide (IV-CTX) pulse therapy.

Then double volume of plasma was processed during each DFPP session every two day. A fraction plasma separator(Asahi Kasei Medical, surface area 2.0 m2,pore size 0.03 mm)and another fraction plasma separator (Asahi Kasei Medical, surface area 2.0 m2, pore size 0.01 mm)were used as first and second filter for plasma fractionation, respectively. 1.5 volume of plasma was processed, and 35~45g human albumin and blood plasma was supplemented during each session. The patients were treated with DFPP every two days for at least 3 times. After DFPP, 300-500ml blood plasma was supplemented.

Other Names:
  • Double Filtration Plasmapheresis +cyclophosphamide
Active Comparator: cyclophosphamide
cyclophosphamide(CTX) pulse therapy

First,patients received methylprednisolone pulse therapy followed by oral prednisone and intravenous cyclophosphamide (IV-CTX) pulse therapy.

After three months therapy, if the renal function was not recover, the patient would be withdrawn from the study. The other patients after CTX pulse therapy for 6 months and achieve remission to receive oral maintenance therapy with azathioprine (AZA).

The dosage of AZA was 1.0-2.0mg/kg/d(more than 50mg/d) and adjusted by white cell count and liver enzyme. If white cell count <3×109/L or an increase in liver enzyme to more than twice the normal upper limit, the dosage of AZA should be reduced. If white cell count <3×109/L or liver enzyme increased repeatedly, the patient would be withdrawn from the study.

Other Names:
  • cyclophosphamide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the renal recovery rate
Time Frame: 3 months
the renal recovery rate at 3 mo defined by dialysis independence and the SCr <5mg/dl for the patients needed renal replacement therapy at the basement, or the SCr decreased more than 30% of the baseline and the urine sediment red blood cell less than 50*104/ml for the patients without renal replacement at the basement.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
kidney survival
Time Frame: 12 months
patient and kidney survival at 12 month
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies(ANCA) level at 12 month
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
relapse defined by birmingham vasculitis activity score(BVAS) increased more than 1.0 at 12 month
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
the change of BVAS
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
the change of Urine protein
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
the change of the count of urine sediment red blood cell
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
the change of the count of serum creatinine(SCr )
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
the change of estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
the vasculitis damage index(VDI) at 12 month
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zhihong Liu, MD, Research Institute of Nephrology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 19, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis

Clinical Trials on DFPP&CTX

3
Subscribe