Gastric Outlet Obstructions Tailored Covered Stents for GOO

February 10, 2015 updated by: Ding Shi, The First People's Hospital of Yuhang District

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Tailored Partially Covered Stents (Placed Fluoroscopically) Versus Standard Uncovered Stents (Placed Endoscopically)

gastric outlet obstruction tailored versus standard stents for malignant gastric outlet obstruction treatments

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To determine the shape of the GOOs, stomach opacifications were performed using contrast media before stenting. In the GOO tailored group (33 cases), the distal stents were semi-spherical with a length of 20 mm and a diameter of 28 mm. The middle stent segments had diameters of 20 mm. The proximal ends of large cup-shaped stents had 53.3 ± 5.5 mm diameters and were 15 or 20 mm long, whereas the large funnel-shaped stents had 33.6 ± 3.6 mm diameters and were 25 or 30 mm long. The control group (32 cases) received standard uncovered stents (semi-spherical, with diameters of 28 mm and 20 mm long).Our hypothesis was that unresectable GOO tailored covered stents are superior to the standard uncovered ones in terms of stent re-obstruction and stent migration. In the current study the efficacy and safety of GOO tailored covered stents for the treatment of non-resectable GOOs caused by distal gastric cancer was compared with standard uncovered stents.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hangzhou, China
        • The First People's Hospital of Yuhang District

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

GOO defined by symptoms resulting in decreased oral intake (nausea, vomiting and inability to eat),the obstruction was caused by primary distal stomach cancer and the site of stenosis was between the gastric body and duodenum bulb

Exclusion Criteria:

the presence of only mild symptoms in patients who could tolerate a liquid diet, clinical evidence of perforation or peritonitis, evidence of multiple small-bowel obstructions because of peritoneal seeding as well as diabetes or other diseases that affect gastric motility and use of promotility agents.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tailored stents MTN-WE-20/100-A
The distal portion of the GOO tailored stents was semi-spherical, with a length of 20 mm, and a diameter of 28 mm. The middle segment had a diameter of 20 mm. The overall length of the stents was 100 mm. Both the middle part and the bottom of the proximal cup segment, and a part of the proximal funnel segment, were covered by a polyethylene membrane.
cup-shaped or funnel-shaped, according to the shapes of the proximal GOOs.
Experimental: Standard stents MTN-CG-s-20/100
Standard uncovered stents were used in the control group. The ends of the stents were semi-spherical with diameters of 28 mm and length of 20 mm. The length of the stents was 100 mm
The ends of the stents were semi-spherical with diameters of 28 mm and length of 20 mm. The length of the stents was 100 mm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficiency of Stents
Time Frame: up to 5 years
number of participants considered having efficacious outcome. Efficacy is defined by Ingrowth + overgrowth in this study
up to 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events
Time Frame: up to 5 years
bleeding, abdominal pain
up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ding Shi, The First People's Hospital of Yuhang District

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 24, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 12, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Clinical Trials on Tailored stents MTN-WE-20/100-A

3
Subscribe