Integrating Pediatric Care Delivery in Rural Healthcare Systems

December 4, 2017 updated by: Possible
Globally, over seven million children under the age of five die each year, although a suite of interventions-safe delivery care, neonatal care and resuscitation, and management of childhood diarrhea, malnutrition, and pneumonia-can prevent many of these deaths when implemented within functioning health systems. This study will include a quasi experimental, stepped wedge, cluster-controlled trial of a mobile health care coordination and quality improvement intervention designed to facilitate comprehensive health systems strengthening. It will do this through training and equipping community-level health care clinics to manage chronic diseases through use of the Chronic Care Model, structured quality improvement sessions to promote clinical mentorship, and use of an integrated electronic medical record to provide real-time data for disease surveillance. The investigators hypothesize that improving upon the health system in these ways will lead to a 25% reduction in under-two mortality through improved services for the citizens of Achham, Nepal.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction: A central challenge in the delivery of evidence-based interventions to promote under-five child survival is the coordination of care across the multiple tiers of the health system, from frontline health workers, to primary care clinics, to district hospitals, to specialty providers. Additionally, children who survive or avoid once-fatal diseases such as congenital and rheumatic heart diseases, prematurity, neurodevelopmental conditions, and disabilities sustained from traumatic injuries, are increasingly living well into adolescence, young adulthood, and beyond. Healthcare delivery systems in resource-limited settings, however, are ill-equipped to manage such patients' care. Mobile technologies, coupled with effective management strategies, may enhance implementation and coordination of evidence-based interventions, but few controlled trials exist to validate this. Particularly lacking are strategies that incorporate mobile technologies in an integrated manner across the health system.

Intervention: We have developed a mobile health care coordination and quality improvement intervention within two rural district healthcare systems in Nepal, where the child mortality rate is an estimated 82 per 1,000, and coordination of child health care is poor. Firstly, the intervention aims to increase the timely engagement in acute care for children under the age of five to receive evidence-based World Health Organization protocols aimed at reducing child mortality-Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth, Integrated Management of Childhood Illness, Integrated Management of Emergency and Essential Surgical Care, and Community-based Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition. Secondly, the intervention aims to implement a Chronic Care Model for pediatric patients under the age of twenty suffering from a chronic disease (congenital and rheumatic heart disease, diabetes, depression, epilepsy, asthma, musculoskeletal and neurodevelopmental disabilities, and pre- and post-surgical conditions).

Analysis: We will conduct a quasi-experimental, stepped-wedge, cluster-controlled trial. The primary outcome of this trial will be under-two mortality. We hypothesize a 25% reduction in under-two mortality rate during the intervention periods, relative to the control period. We hypothesize a 50% improvement in follow-up rates, a 30% improvement in global symptoms score, a 20% reduction in disability score, and a 20% reduction in inpatient days in hospital. We will use both quantitative and qualitative methods to assess the scalability of the intervention in terms of logistics, human resources, costs, and utilization.

Impact: Rigorous evaluations of systems-level child healthcare interventions are needed to drive global healthcare policies and their implementation. The trial proposed here will inform the potential impact and scalability of health systems strengthening interventions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

7000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 49 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Reproductive age, 15-49 years
  • Resides within 14 village clusters that comprise experimental/control arms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • n/a

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
Existing healthcare system
This is the current rural, district-level public sector healthcare infrastructure of rural Nepal that is not strengthened during the study.
Other Names:
  • Control
Experimental: Health System Improvement
Structured Quality Improvement Chronic Care Model Integrated Electronic Medical Record Solar-powered electrical supply Performance-based financing
For structured quality improvement, trained healthcare providers (primarily doctors from referral hospital) will serve as mentors to mid-level providers. The mentors will facilitate on-site trainings of primary care with mid-level providers at the district hospital. Mentors will also travel monthly to the healthcare facilities themselves to provide training both in the direct context of clinical care and to provide feedback based upon surveillance and monitoring data. The focus will be on the techniques from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement, including Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, run charts, and root cause analyses. Finally, they will work with the clinical healthcare staff to identify resource needs from the local government for maintenance, water, electricity, and supplies. These resource needs will be addressed through an integrated supply chain management system across the tiers of the healthcare system.
Other Names:
  • Clincal Mentorship
  • Supply Chain Management
Senior physicians trained in mentorship of non-physician mid-level providers will provide decision support for mid-level providers in the current district healthcare system with specific protocols for target conditions. We will add the following elements: focus on mid-level, non-physician providers as the primary clinicians within the intervention; intensive Community Health Worker (CHW) outreach for detection, screening, follow-up of patients, and encouragement of patient self-care and behavior change; and focused effort on the seamless care coordination of patients across the tiers of the system. Through trainings of CHWs, much of patient self-management comes in the form of home visits that reinforce clinic and hospital counseling, including risk management and prevention. CHWs will be trained in the counseling of each target condition, with counseling largely occurring in the patients' homes, where much of the challenges of chronic disease management and behavior change lie.
Other Names:
  • Task-Shifting
  • Healthcare Systems Strengthening
Clinical information systems. We are developing a system for tracking patients that integrates across each of the tiers using an electronic medical record. This is a key technology in supporting each of the above delivery system design elements.
Other Names:
  • Electronic Medical Record
As a component of our comprehensive healthcare systems strengthening intervention, we are installing solar panels at community-level clinics to ensure continuous electrical supply for medical devices and technology.
Other Names:
  • Solar Panel
As part of our healthcare systems strengthening intervention, we have established a performance-based financing agreement with the Government of Nepal that conditionally funds healthcare delivery based on population-level health outcomes and quality healthcare service delivery. In this arrangement, the Government serves as a regulator of healthcare delivery rather than a primary provider of healthcare services.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Under-two mortality rate
Time Frame: Five years
We expect the intervention will lead to a 25% decrease in under-two mortality in the experimental arm.
Five years
Infant mortality rate
Time Frame: Five years
We expect the intervention will lead to a 25% decrease in the infant mortality rate in the experimental arm.
Five years
Neonatal mortality rate
Time Frame: Five years
We expect the intervention will lead to a 25% decrease in the neonatal mortality rate in the experimental arm.
Five years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Institutional Birth Rate
Time Frame: Five years
We expect the intervention will lead to a 25% increase in Institutional Birth Rate among reproductive-age women in the experimental arm.
Five years
Antenatal Care Completion Percentage
Time Frame: Five years
We expect the intervention will lead to a 25% increase in number of pregnant women completing all 4 antenatal care visits in the experimental arm.
Five years
Postpartum contraceptive prevalence rate
Time Frame: Five years
We expect the intervention will lead to a 20% increase in postpartum contraceptive prevalence rate among reproductive age women who have delivered in the past 2 years in the experimental arm.
Five years
Preterm delivery rate
Time Frame: Five years
We expect the intervention will lead to 25% fewer preterm births in the experimental arm.
Five years
Low birthweight delivery rates
Time Frame: Five years
We expect the intervention will lead to a 25% reduction in babies born with low birthweights in the experimental arm
Five years
Percentage of stillbirths
Time Frame: Five years
We expect the intervention will lead to 25% fewer stillbirths in the experimental arm.
Five years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: David Citrin, PhD, MPH, Possible
  • Study Chair: Biraj Karmacharya, MBBS, Msc, University of Washington

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infant Mortality

Clinical Trials on Existing healthcare system

3
Subscribe