Ulipristal Acetate Versus GnRH Analogue and Myometrial Preservation

November 17, 2016 updated by: Fulvio Zullo, University Magna Graecia

Ulipristal Acetate Versus GnRH Analogue for Myometrial Preservation in Patients With Submucosal Uterine Leiomyoma G2

Submucosal fibroid grow inside the uterine cavity and are associated with menorrhagia, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and infertility. Type II (G2) fibroids often require more surgeries due to their particular position in the myometrium. Surgery, moreover, should always be tailored, particularly in patients wishing to conceive, to preserve the integrity of the myometrium. Preoperative use of GnRH agonist appears to be relevant and beneficial in patients with submucous fibroids, but are associated with several side effects. the eighty percent of patients treated by UPA showed a clinically meaningful reduction of more than 25% in fibroid volume, and 50% of patients a reduction of 50%. fibroid volume reduction appeared to be maintained for 6 months after the end of UPA treatment

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Uterine leiomyoma is the most common benign tumor of the female genital tract. Submucosal fibroid are about 10% of all uterine myoma. They grow inside the uterine cavity and are usually associated with menorrhagia, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and infertility. According to the degree of myometrial penetration, the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) classified submucosal myomas in Type 0 (G0, totally intracavitary fibroids), Type I (G1, <50% myometral penetration), or Type II (G2, >50% myometral penetration).

Hysteroscopic removal of submucosal myomas improves menorrhagia and AUB but can be challenging in women with Type II (G2) fibroids, since they often require more and more surgeries due to their particular position in the context of myometrium. Surgery, moreover, should always be tailored, particularly in patients wishing to conceive, to preserve the integrity of the myometrium. In this particular population, indeed, the possibility of avoiding any kind of uterine surgery should always be exploited. Up to now, hysteroscopic resection of submucosal fibroids is considered the gold standard for symptomatic patients, since no medication has been able to restore uterine cavity in a permanent manner. In this setting, use of a GnRH agonist before surgery is still a matter of debate, but literature reports that preoperative use of GnRH agonist appears to be relevant and beneficial in patients with submucous fibroids. Benefits include a resolution of preoperative anemia, a decrease in fibroid size, a reduction of endometrial thickness and vascularization with subsequently improved visibility and reduced fluid absorption, and the possibility of surgical scheduling.

Conversely, this preoperative treatment is associated with some side effects such as hot flushes and postinjection endometrial bleeding due to the flare-up effect.

Data on SPRM showed that eighty percent of patients treated by UPA showed a clinically meaningful reduction of more than 25% in fibroid volume, and 50% of patients a reduction of 50%. In the subpopulation of patients not undergoing surgery, fibroid volume reduction appeared to be maintained for 6 months after the end of UPA treatment.

This was in contrast to patients receiving a GnRH agonist, in whom fibroids began to regrow 1 to 3 months after the last dose, reaching their baseline size after 6 months.

No sub-analysis have been conducted on submucosal fibroids, but is of interest to underline that, when myomas regress so much that they no longer distort the uterine cavity, surgery may not be required. This could represent a safe way to avoid surgery in patients with G2 fibroids desiring pregnancy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Catanzaro, Italy, 88100
        • Recruiting
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese-Ciaccio

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

G2 submucosal leiomyoma <3 cm, symptoms of menomethrorragia, menstrual disorder, infertility, pelvic pain

Exclusion Criteria:

submucosal leyomyoma other than G2 or greater than 3 cm, intramural or subserosal leiomyomas endometrial hyperplasia with atypia history of uterine surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ulipristal acetate
Women will be treated with an oral dose of ulipristal acetate 5 mg/day for 2 courses of 3 months each
5 mg/day will be administered starting from day 1 of the cycle and up to three months later for two courses, with an interval between the courses of 1 month
Other Names:
  • Esmya
Active Comparator: Leuprolile acetate
Women will be treated with an injection IM on leuprolide acetate 11,25 in the luteal phase repeated 3 months later
One dose of 11.25 GnRH analogue depot will be administered in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (days 21-24) and repeated 3 months later
Other Names:
  • Enantone 11.25

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of restored uterine cavity 1 year after enrollment
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment
To compare the proportion of patients, treated by UPA or by GnRh-a, with uterine cavity no longer distorted by their submucous myoma
1 year after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to pregnancy
Time Frame: from the end of treatment to the obtainance of pregnancy
to compare time to pregnancy in patients treated with Ulipristal Acetate and GnRH-a
from the end of treatment to the obtainance of pregnancy
Live birth rate
Time Frame: A the time of delivery
to compare live birth rate in patients treated with Ulipristal Acetate and GnRH-a
A the time of delivery
Proportion of patients needing surgery after UPA or GnRH-a
Time Frame: 24 weeks after the first dose of drugs
to compare need for surgery in patients treated with Ulipristal Acetate and GnRH-a.
24 weeks after the first dose of drugs

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibroid

Clinical Trials on ulipristal acetate

3
Subscribe