Outcomes in Femoropopliteal Disease Stratified by Translesional Pressure Gradient

September 11, 2018 updated by: Subhash Banerjee, North Texas Veterans Healthcare System
  1. To perform an observational analysis to determine if mean translesional gradient measurements (TLG) are associated with differences in clinical outcomes in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease and claudication.
  2. Hypothesis: Patients stratified by a residual translesional gradient </= 11 mmHg after peripheral revascularization or angiography alone will have better clinical outcomes than patients with TLG > 11 mmHg as assessed by six minute walk (6MW), walking impairment questionnaire scores (WIQ), ankle brachial index and need for repeat procedure at 6 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The role of measuring translesional pressure gradients(TLG) in peripheral arterial disease lesions below the iliac artery is unclear. In a previous study the investigators demonstrated that a pressure wire can be effectively used to measure gradients in the femoropopliteal (FP) arterial bed showing good correlation between TLGs recorded with exercise ankle brachial index and walking impairment scores. However there is a no evidence that effectively modifying the gradient or having a high residual gradient after revascularization or just with medical therapy correlates with worse clinical outcomes.

This is a prospective, single center, observational clinical study to evaluate whether measurement of mean residual TLG at the time of angiography and/or immediately after endovascular revascularization are associated with clinically important outcomes in patients with claudication symptoms.

Prior to angiography they will be asked to complete an ankle brachial index evaluation, baseline six minute walk test and walking impairment questionnaire. Arterial access should be obtained in the contralateral common femoral artery to the symptomatic limb if feasible. Angiographic images are to be obtained, interpreted and clinical decisions regarding endovascular treatment are to be made per treating physician's discretion prior to obtaining translesional pressure gradients. In patients whose angiogram does not meet exclusion criteria and do not have a chronic total occlusion (CTO) a baseline TLG will be obtained. A 0.014" pressure wire/catheter to measure pressure will be inserted. After baseline calibration in the superficial femoral artery, the wire will be inserted past the narrowest lesion into the popliteal vessel. Intra-arterial adenosine 100-200 mcg will be given for hyperemia and measurements are to be recorded. If an intervention is planned, repeat measurements are to be obtained at the end of the procedure. If no intervention is planned this will be the residual or final TLG recorded. If baseline measurement are unable to obtained due to a CTO then only a post intervention residual TLG will be obtained and included in analysis. The operator will be blinded to the pre and post TLG measurements by turning the display monitor away from the procedure table and towards the recorder situated in the procedure room when measurements are being obtained.

Patients will follow up within two weeks post angiography for routine scheduled follow up and will obtain repeat ABI, WIQ, and six minute walk if they underwent revascularization. Treating physicians and study coordinators collecting these test measurements will be blinded to TLG measurements but not to angiography and treatment. Patients will again be evaluated at 6 months follow up with repeat ABI, WIQ and six minute walk.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75216
        • VA North Texas Health Care System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with claudication symptoms and femoropopliteal disease referred for peripheral angiography and possible revascularization.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent
  • At least 18 years old
  • Unilateral lower limb claudication Rutherford class 2-4
  • Subjects must be able to complete screening six minute walk, walking impairment questionnaire, and baseline ankle brachial index
  • Estimated survival ≥1 year in the judgment of the primary operator
  • Documented symptomatic femoropopliteal (FP) atherosclerotic disease with at least moderate angiographic stenosis in the symptomatic lower extremity
  • Subjects with multilevel disease can be screened and enrolled after treatment of other non FP PAD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life expectancy less than 12 months or other medical co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the subject's ability to participate in the trial, limit the subject's compliance with the follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific integrity of the trial
  • Severe Bilateral claudication
  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to contrast dye that, in the opinion of the investigator, cannot be adequately pre-medicated
  • Known hypersensitivity to adenosine or moderate to severe asthma
  • Pregnancy
  • Serum Creatinine >2.5
  • Vascular graft, aneurysm or postsurgical stenosis of the target vessel
  • Documented untreated severe iliac or below-the knee stenosis with < 2 vessel run-off in leg with femoropopliteal stenosis or untreated bilateral symptomatic peripheral arterial disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
final TLG </=11 mmHg
includes all patients who have a final mean translesional gradient measurement (TLG) < 11 mmHg regardless if revascularization is done or not.
Patients will be stratified into two groups based on the final mean translesional pressure gradient obtained in the femoropopliteal arterial bed after revascularization or just after angiography if no revascularization is done.
final TLG > 11 mmHg
includes all patients who have a final mean translesional gradient measurement (TLG) > 11 mmHg regardless if revascularization is done or not.
Patients will be stratified into two groups based on the final mean translesional pressure gradient obtained in the femoropopliteal arterial bed after revascularization or just after angiography if no revascularization is done.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in six minute walk distance in meters at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months +/- 15 days after enrollment
Compare change in six minute walk distance at 2 weeks post angiography +/- revascularization to distance walked at 6 months +/- 15 days between patients stratified by a residual mean translesional gradient > 11 mmHg or </= 11 mmHg. The six minute walk test involves walking in a straight 100m hallway back and forth for as far as possible during a six minute time span.
6 months +/- 15 days after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Walking Impairment Questionairre (WIQ)Score at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months +/- 15 days after enrollment
Compare change in WIQ scores from within 2 weeks post angiography +/- revascularization to WIQ score at 6 months +/- 15 days between patients stratified by a residual mean translesional gradient > 11 mmHg or </= 11 mmHg . The walking impairment score used is based on the patient completing short questionnaire about perceived degree of walking impairment at various distances.
6 months +/- 15 days after enrollment
Change in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) at 6 months
Time Frame: 6months +/- 15 days after enrollment
Change in ABI between patients stratified by a residual mean translesional gradient > 11 mmHg or </= 11 mmHg from the index within 2 weeks post TLG measurement to index at 6 months after measurement
6months +/- 15 days after enrollment
Change in six minute walk distance from baseline to within 2 weeks post revascularization
Time Frame: baseline pre revascularization to two weeks post measurement
Change in six minute walk from baseline measurement in those patients that undergo revascularization to six minute walk distance checked within 2 weeks after revascularization.
baseline pre revascularization to two weeks post measurement
Change in WIQ score from baseline to within 2 weeks post revascularization
Time Frame: baseline pre revascularization to two weeks post measurement
Change in WIQ score from baseline measurement in those patients that undergo revascularization to six minute walk distance checked within 2 weeks after revascularization.
baseline pre revascularization to two weeks post measurement
Need for repeat revascularization or amputation as assessed by rates of need in repeat revascularization or amputation
Time Frame: six months
compare rates of need in repeat revascularization or amputation between patients stratified by a residual mean translesional gradient > 11 mmHg or </= 11 mmHg during 6 month period after TLG measurement.
six months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary analysis evaluating correlation between change in 6 minute walk distance at 6 month and residual translesional gradients.
Time Frame: 6 months
evaluate for linear correlation between change in six minute walk from baseline to 6 months to mean translesional gradient
6 months
Secondary analysis evaluating correlation in change in WIQ score at 6 month and residual translesional gradients.
Time Frame: 6 months
evaluate for linear correlation between change in WIQ from baseline to 6 months to mean translesional gradient
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 6, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease

Clinical Trials on translesional gradient measurement

3
Subscribe