Endoscopic Nasogallbladder Drainage Versus Gallbladder Stenting Before Cholecystecomy

January 4, 2016 updated by: Yoo Byung Moo, Ajou University School of Medicine

Endoscopic Naso-gallbladder Drainage Versus Gallbladder Stenting Before Elective Cholecystectomy in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis and a High Suspicion of Common Bile Duct Stone; A Prospective Randomized Preliminary Study

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current standard therapy for acute cholecystitis, but temporary decompression of the gallbladder (GB) through percutaneous or endoscopic route can be required to alleviate inflammatory process and reach an appropriate time for elective surgery in patients with high operative risk or marked local inflammation or organ dysfunction. Also preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often needed because common bile duct (CBD) stone is accompanied in patients with acute cholecystitis at reported rate from 7-20%.

Two-steps approach of percutaneous transhepatic GB drainage (PTGBD) followed by ERCP or vice versa has been performed for the treatment of acute cholecystitis with concomitant CBD stone who are not suitable for urgent cholecystectomy. However single-step drainage of CBD and GB through ERCP and endoscopic transpapillary GB drainage (ETGD) using nasocystic tube or plastic stent has alternatively been attempted in patients who have contraindications for PTGBD. In clinical practice, many endoscopists have hesitated to perform ETGD because of its relatively low technical success rate and specific concern about post-ERCP adverse event but it minimizes catheter keeping duration, and provides effective clinical improvement via physiologic route.

Currently there are scarce data on if ETGD using nasocystic tube or plastic stent are comparable in terms of clinical efficacy and safety.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gyeonggido
      • Suwon, Gyeonggido, Korea, Republic of, 443-380
        • Ajou University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • grade II or III acute cholecystitis met Tokyo 13 diagnostic criteria
  • a high suspicion of CBD stone based on laboratory and imaging study
  • informed consent given.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bilo-pancreatic malignancy or surgically altered enteric anatomy
  • subsequent elective surgery is expected to be impossible even after GB decompression based on American Society of Anesthesiologist class

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Endoscopic nasogallbladder drainage
If GB cannulation was achieved and the wire was coiled in the GB, 5 to 7-Fr Pigtail type naso-cholecystic drainage tube (Liguory nasal biliary drainage set; Wilson-Cook Medical, Salem, NC, USA) was placed into the GB
Endoscopic
Active Comparator: Endoscopic gallbladder stenting
If GB cannulation was achieved and the wire was coiled in the GB, 7-Fr double pigtail plastic stent (Zimmon; Wilson-Cook Medical, Salem, NC, USA) was placed into the GB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Techncal success rate
Time Frame: From the time of randomization until the time when the endoscopic procedure is ended, assessed up to 24hours
This outcome was defined as successful deep GB cannulation and placement of assigned drainage device by randomization, and determined by the operator based on the fluoroscoic images of the procedures.
From the time of randomization until the time when the endoscopic procedure is ended, assessed up to 24hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical success rate
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the date of clinical improvement (fever, leukocytosis, abdominal pain), assessed up to 72 hours
This outcome was defined as improvement of three clinical parameters of acute cholecystitis (fever, abdominal pain, leukocytosis) within 72 hours following either type of ETGD procedure, and assessed by the review of patient's mediacal records.
From the date of randomization until the date of clinical improvement (fever, leukocytosis, abdominal pain), assessed up to 72 hours
early adverse event
Time Frame: From the date of the randomization until the date of the elective cholecystectomy, assessed up to 2 weeks
This outcome was defined as any procedure related event occurring between the endoscopic procedure and elective cholecystectomy, and assessed by the patient's medical records.
From the date of the randomization until the date of the elective cholecystectomy, assessed up to 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Byung Moo Yoo, MD, Ajou University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cholecystitis, Acute

3
Subscribe