Treatment Efficacy of Leg Cycling as Part of Physiotherapy Treatment in Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture

March 19, 2016 updated by: AVITAL HERSHKOVITZ, Rabin Medical Center

A Comparison of Two Physiotherapy Treatment Protocols, With and Without Cycling Training , in Elderly Patients With Hip Fractures at Their Subacute Stage Following Surgery

This study aims to evaluate whether a combination of cycling training as part of physiotherapy treatment will contribute more than conventional physiotherapy treatment for elderly patients after hip fracture surgery in their subacute phase of rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adults who have experienced a fall, followed by proximal hip fracture that required surgery, suffer from specific problems that interrupt the rehabilitation period in their subacute phase.

Various modes of treatment available as part of the physical rehabilitation but there is not enough data in the literature regarding the contribution of cycling training with leg cycle ergometer as part of conventional physiotherapy treatment in elderly patients after hip fracture surgery.

This study evaluates whether the additional cycling to physiotherapy treatment will improve the functional ability, the balance performance while standing, hip muscle strength and pain level in those patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Petach tiqva, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • "Beit- Rivka" geriatric rehabilitation hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 95 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Proximal hip fracture with full or partial weight bearing indication.
  • Surgical fixation ( nailing or total hip replacement or hemiarthroplasty)
  • Pre-morbid function: walking independently or under supervision with or without assistance aid
  • Cognitive function: Mini-mental state examination score above 21

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pathological hip fracture.
  • Unstable heart or pulmonary disease.
  • Presence of other fractures as a result of the current fall.
  • Neurological comorbidities ( CVA, Parkinson, MS ).
  • Entering the rehabilitation center more than three weeks after hip surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Physiotherapy treatment & leg cycling

This group will receive conventional physiotherapy treatments, each session will last 30 minutes. Treatments include muscles strength exercises for upper and lower extremities, static and dynamic balance training in standing ,pain relief techniques and functional training (including transfers, sit to stand, walking and climbing stairs). The treatment program shall be consistent with the patient's problems and the degree of difficulty will rise depending on progress.

In addition this group will have cycling training with leg cycle ergometer for 20 minutes.

This treatment protocol will last for three weeks, five days a week, 50 minutes each session per day.

All patients receive comprehensive care as part of routine rehabilitation program : individual physical therapy treatment, gym's training and balance training in virtual reality, occupational therapy treatment, strengthening and range of motion exercises as a group.

In addition each patient in this group will train with stationary leg cycle ergometer for 20 minutes under physical therapist's supervision . Cycling exercise intensity subjectively determined by the patient using RPE Borg scale . Maximal intensity level determined as 14 in Borg scale.

Active Comparator: Physiotherapy treatment & music listening

This group will receive conventional physiotherapy treatments, each session will last 30 minutes .Treatments include muscles strength exercises for upper and lower extremities, static and dynamic balance training in standing ,pain relief techniques and functional training (including transfers, sit to stand, walking and climbing stairs). The treatment program shall be consistent with the patient's problems and the degree of difficulty will rise depending on progress.

In addition this group will listen to music (while sitting on a chair) for 20 minutes.This treatment protocol will last for three weeks, five days a week, 50 minutes each session per day.

All patients receive comprehensive care as part of routine rehabilitation program : individual physical therapy treatment, gym's training and balance training in virtual reality, occupational therapy treatment, strengthening and range of motion exercises as a group.

In addition each patient in this group will listen to music with earphone for 20 minutes while sitting under physical therapist supervision.

Overall treatment session will last 50 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FIM ( functional independence measure)
Time Frame: baseline-at the first day of intervention
Provides a uniform system of measurement for disability, it measures the level of patient's disability and indicates how much assistance is required for the individual to carry out activities of daily living. It contains 18 items composed of 13 motor tasks and 5 cognitive tasks. Tasks are rated on 7 point ordinal scale that ranges from total assistance to complete independence. Score range from 18 (lowest) to 126 (highest) indicating level of function.
baseline-at the first day of intervention
Static balance test and weight bearing distribution while standing
Time Frame: baseline-at the first day of intervention
The balance and weight bearing distribution parameters will be evaluated by posturographic device . This system assesses pressure fluctuations produced by the heels and toes of a subject standing on four separate platforms two for each foot and their respective halves. The pressure plates emit electronic signals which are digitized and processed by the posturographic device software to yield a set of unique parameters. Calculated results based on these parameters, which are statistically and functionally independent, reflect the interactions of the various neuro-physiological and neuro-anatomic subsystems involved in balance control.
baseline-at the first day of intervention
Muscle strength
Time Frame: baseline-at the first day of intervention
Quadriceps strength and hand grip will be assessed by hand held dynamometer. This is a quantitative and objective method for assessment of muscular strength. Scored using force production in kilograms.
baseline-at the first day of intervention
Pain intensity (measured with VAS)
Time Frame: baseline-at the first day of intervention
Subjective pain intensity will be measured with VAS which is an 11 point scale from 0-10, "0" indicates no pain and "10" indicates the most intense pain imaginable. The patient select the value that is most in line with the intensity of pain that he experienced in the last 24 hours.
baseline-at the first day of intervention
Change from baseline in FIM at 2 weeks
Time Frame: Second week of intervention
Provides a uniform system of measurement for disability, it measures the level of patient's disability and indicates how much assistance is required for the individual to carry out activities of daily living. It contains 18 items composed of 13 motor tasks and 5 cognitive tasks. Tasks are rated on 7 point ordinal scale that ranges from total assistance to complete independence. Score range from 18 (lowest) to 126 (highest) indicating level of function.
Second week of intervention
Change from baseline in FIM at 3 weeks
Time Frame: End of intervention at third week
Provides a uniform system of measurement for disability, it measures the level of patient's disability and indicates how much assistance is required for the individual to carry out activities of daily living. It contains 18 items composed of 13 motor tasks and 5 cognitive tasks. Tasks are rated on 7 point ordinal scale that ranges from total assistance to complete independence. Score range from 18 (lowest) to 126 (highest) indicating level of function.
End of intervention at third week
Change from baseline in static balance test and weight bearing distribution while standing at 2 weeks
Time Frame: Second week of intervention
The balance and weight bearing distribution parameters will be evaluated by posturographic device . This system assesses pressure fluctuations produced by the heels and toes of a subject standing on four separate platforms two for each foot and their respective halves. The pressure plates emit electronic signals which are digitized and processed by the posturographic device software to yield a set of unique parameters. Calculated results based on these parameters, which are statistically and functionally independent, reflect the interactions of the various neuro-physiological and neuro-anatomic subsystems involved in balance control.
Second week of intervention
Change from baseline in static balance test and weight bearing distribution while standing at 3 weeks
Time Frame: End of intervention at third week
The balance and weight bearing distribution parameters will be evaluated by posturographic device . This system assesses pressure fluctuations produced by the heels and toes of a subject standing on four separate platforms two for each foot and their respective halves. The pressure plates emit electronic signals which are digitized and processed by the posturographic device software to yield a set of unique parameters. Calculated results based on these parameters, which are statistically and functionally independent, reflect the interactions of the various neuro-physiological and neuro-anatomic subsystems involved in balance control.
End of intervention at third week
Change from baseline in muscle strength at 2 weeks
Time Frame: Second week of intervention
Quadriceps strength and hand grip will be assessed by hand held dynamometer. This is a quantitative and objective method for assessment of muscular strength. Scored using force production in kilograms.
Second week of intervention
Change from baseline in muscle strength at 3 weeks
Time Frame: End of intervention at third week
Quadriceps strength and hand grip will be assessed by hand held dynamometer. This is a quantitative and objective method for assessment of muscular strength. Scored using force production in kilograms.
End of intervention at third week
Change from baseline in pain intensity at 2 weeks (measured with VAS)
Time Frame: Second week of intervention
Subjective pain intensity will be measured with VAS which is an 11 point scale from 0-10, "0" indicates no pain and "10" indicates the most intense pain imaginable. The patient select the value that is most in line with the intensity of pain that he experienced in the last 24 hours.
Second week of intervention
Change from baseline in pain intensity at 3 weeks (measured with VAS)
Time Frame: End of intervention at third week
Subjective pain intensity will be measured with VAS which is an 11 point scale from 0-10, "0" indicates no pain and "10" indicates the most intense pain imaginable. The patient select the value that is most in line with the intensity of pain that he experienced in the last 24 hours.
End of intervention at third week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Avital Hershkovitz, MD-PhD, Beit-Rivka Geriatric Rehabilitation Hospital
  • Study Chair: Youssef Ma Masharawi, PhD, Tel Aviv University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 22, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fractures

Clinical Trials on Physiotherapy treatment & leg cycling

3
Subscribe